Albalaha found that, the worst
ever recorded in EC, =only 30win
in 100bet,
and we all knew labby could only win
with at leastg 33%+1win.

Thus, apart from the deadly marthy
at the very last unemerging win, and huge br

we could, for academic understanding.
win even only 30w/100bet...
How, by manipulating the virtual labby
betting.

presume every
next 100bet has only 30hit
wait for long string of losses,
eg.
9row of losses,
or
only 1w in 11bet,
or only 2w in say, 13bet,
or only 3w, in 15bet,
then we could trick the virtual
labby, it has 34win to close!!!

how, by assuming the previous four
losses as a win, in the labby progression,
then...there be at least 30hit, as deduce
by Albalaha's 30/100!
then the labby must closed,
when worst ever 30win materialise before
or at the 100th spin or bet!

  I never claimed that 30/100 is the worst recorded hit rate of an Ec but only analysed some 100-200k results of baccarat to find 30/100 as the worst there. Brute force progressions on virtual limits works mostly but it is not unbeatable still and hence I do not advise anybody to try that.

It is almost unseen to find an EC with over 25 successive losses but still, it is not advisable to play a marty after say 15 successive losses.
There are two problems in this approach:
1. A trigger to bet is too rare
2. You can still lose, albeit chances are negligible
            Actually, virtual limits as I defined in a separate topic in my section is only an assumed limit beyond which millions of hands/spins could not cross, hence extremely rare to ever happen but not impossible.

Dear Wong, It will be highly unfortunate for me if anyone reading my posts misconstrue them with fallacious ideas. Actually we need to tone down our progressions in the worst times than dragging it up.