Since the first casino open stall, thousands of systems that people devised can't beat the casino, and the math prof. shrieking their lung out since, that we can't have edge, or win and beatthe casino's holy grail, that namely roulette, they say we can't even win, if the wheel have no green!
Maybe we should leave the betselection and move to other plane, that avoiding extreme variance in the progression itself.
We know that, when extreme in bet selection, hit, the winning hit keep sleeping and our progression keep snowballing till we bust our br,
thus if we wait for the extreme in selection, and virtual bet the progression, till the selection stabilized, then we bet the progression halfway, we already "save", a bundle of our br, and proceed to win.
This way , we already avoid the edge, and avoid the debacle of busting our br.
In oversimplified example,
Labby win when 33%+1,
When we bet from the start virtually with 1u, as the 1st bet, we wait for extreme variance, and when it seem to stabilized, we bet the labby halfway, thus the winning is more than 1u, and if losing extreme keep coming, the cut losses, is not vis a vis, and out of context , or out of sync mathematically. ?...
What your opinion?