Yesterday in the casino I test my new twist to catch strikes spotting bias sequences.
I was using Regression Up & Pull and got a quick 20% return on investment and quit.

Getting away flat betting riding strikes alone, but I want out more when I strike 5,6,8 times in a row.
Not satisfied with the known positive progressions, so if you know a variant that is not listed, plz let me know.

1) Regression Up & Pull
2) Win two flat betting and increase one-half unit - up as you win
3) Paroli
4) 1326
5) Guetting

Now I look at some craps videos on youtube and the Dice Doctor has a nice positive progression with a twist.
First, you bet 1 unit and if you win you increase and bet 2 units.
Assume you win both bets and are up 3, then you staking 1,5 next if a win you bet 3 and that sum up to 4,5.
Then next you bet 2,5 and if you win 5 then you have 7,5 and place 4 next.
Push for more at the same time as you regress, very clever.

Cheers

Striking

Okay, I have stopped the thoughts about planning when the time might come, or how to figure out when it is going to appear, etc.  That is usually the downfall or the path to losing more than you can win, or sets the player onto the path to recoup, instead of smacking the casino a bit. 

I call it striking, not so much riding the bias or taking advantage.  Plain and simple, striking.

What serves me well and avoids me from the, 'I was an unintelligent and simply did not wager' punishment!

Bias, to me is seeing it as it is happening, not wagering for it.  As it happens, just say I was flat betting a few hands.  It started.  I won 3 hands straight and I now see the bias, whatever it might be.  The correction, the abnormality, the curve, the rarity, whatever it is--does not matter one bit.  (That is where so many, most all, players go wrong.  They are trying to define and figure it out.) 

So I won the 3 hands flat betting.  Say I was at $150.00 a hand as an example.  I am up $450.00 for that section.  I will take the $450.00 and split it into 4 units of $110.00 each and use those 4 wagers of $110.00 for my (1 + 4 Side Parlay) wagering for the striking attempts.  One successful (1 + 4 Side Parlay) will get me $3,520.00 if I am not mistaking.  Yes, some of the wagers will have to be sacrificed, some flat bets and possibly one or more of the (1 + 4 Side Parlay) attempts.  Progression and a continuance (1 + 4 Side Parlay) is a lot to ask to come out of.  But when something is hitting, don't be scared, scared to win-scared to wager, IMO is the worst thing a player can subscribe to. 

But as far as a striking, that is something along the lines as to what I would do.  Rather than a planned attack.  Planned attacks to me are extremely difficult and usually do not work out. 

QuoteBias, to me is seeing it as it is happening, not wagering for it.  As it happens, just say I was flat betting a few hands.  It started.  I won 3 hands straight and I now see the bias, whatever it might be.  The correction, the abnormality, the curve, the rarity, whatever it is--does not matter one bit.  (That is where so many, most all, players go wrong.  They are trying to define and figure it out.) 

We are different gamblers, for example, Gizmo talks about his global effect and I talk about my methodology.
You mention sides bets and parlays that is a different approach.

I am referring to Sputnik's March and don't play hide and seek games with anyone.
After proving that two events out of three can strike several times in a row and create a true bias I got 6K views and very little replies.

QuoteSo I won the 3 hands flat betting.  Say I was at $150.00 a hand as an example.  I am up $450.00 for that section.  I will take the $450.00 and split it into 4 units of $110.00 each and use those 4 wagers of $110.00 for my (1 + 4 Side Parlay) wagering for the striking attempts.  One successful (1 + 4 Side Parlay) will get me $3,520.00 if I am not mistaking.  Yes, some of the wagers will have to be sacrificed, some flat bets and possibly one or more of the (1 + 4 Side Parlay) attempts.  Progression and a continuance (1 + 4 Side Parlay) is a lot to ask to come out of.  But when something is hitting, don't be scared, scared to win-scared to wager, IMO is the worst thing a player can subscribe to.

I read this several times and still don't get it.
Why and how does someone make side bets and play both sides at the same time?
If I understand you correctly and not misunderstand your way to play the game.

QuoteBut as far as a striking, that is something along the lines as to what I would do.  Rather than a planned attack.  Planned attacks to me are extremely difficult and usually do not work out.

I consider my way so clever and advance that I considering apply them into Trading and Sportbetting with a combination of trading techniques and value betting.

Out of a table of say 7 players, there might very well be 7 different/varying ways of wagering.

All might win the session, all might lose the session, maybe only 1 or 2 will win and most lose.

The session will determine which players were correct in their application of wagering. 

That is the way I see it after all these years.

I never say you are wrong.  Don't think that. 

I really do see the best profiting players using non-conventional wagering techniques these days for hitting the casino hard and actually winning, if they can control themselves that is. 

Quote from: Sputnik on July 23, 2018, 03:28:24 PM
We are different gamblers, for example, Gizmo talks about his global effect and I talk about my methodology.
You mention sides bets and parlays that is a different approach.



I read this several times and still don't get it.
Why and how does someone make side bets and play both sides at the same time?
If I understand you correctly and not misunderstand your way to play the game.

I mentioned side bets and parlays as an example to my choice/option of striking when I see the bias actually there.  To me there is a huge difference in wagering for it and wagering once it is there.  Either way it is the same risk, continues or cancels out. 

However, if it continues and gets stronger, I win and win huge.   If it cancels, I lost a flat bet or whatever I wagered on it to continue. 

I am a gambler, I am not a writer or a theorist, please understand that!

I attempt to put into words and explain, not easy most times.

Side Bets:  There are the side bets on the bac table such as Panda 8, Fortune 7, 3 card 8/9's, Bad Beat, natural 8 over 7's, etc.  I do wager on some of those as well as parlays or positive progressions on the Banker or Player side, etc.

I also have my (1 + 4 Side Parlay) wager, which I will always allocated the start of it from win money.  To me, that is a huge advantage and if I hit a couple out of say ten attempts, I will be far ahead.  I always reset and refresh, which so few players actually do practice.

The 1 + 4 Side Parlay wager I have, is always in addition to a flat bet or any other wager.  Not against or playing both sides as you might think.  I pay no attention to it and it does not effect my wagering.  It is a psych thing and works for myself.  I do not wager the 1 + 4 on the table side wagers, it is a side wager (but on top of my other wager) on the banker or player side. 

It strictly is a huge boast in winning that I do not have to have prevail to continue wagering, count on or rely on in anyway.  It is included in my striking wagering. 

Am I still unclear?