Quote from: NathanDetroit on March 23, 2013, 12:20:32 PM
Basic  bet    $ 10  x 40  = $400 per session   x 3 sessions . Bankroll required $ 1,  200.

Win goal 15- 20 % LL 25 % or  3 losses in a row.

Attempt to win 2 out of 3 sessions.

Additional  MM forwarded in a separate PM  to you.

N.D.

For recreational purposes only.  Play at your own risk.

This is very interesting and valid point you make ND.

May you disclose the MM suggested here? I am interested. Or PM me?
Thanx

.
The methodology to win two out of three sessions and stay ahead overall ...
.
If you win two sessions in a row you stop for the day and don't play any more, you won two out of three and that is three possibility out of seven ...

WW
WLW
LWW
.
Accept a small loss and that is two possibility's ....

LLW
LWLL
.
And one possibility to break even if they come as zig zag ...

LWLW
.
And finally three loses in a row ...

LLL
.
As you can see ND mention that the win goal is very close to your loss limit ...
So if you win two you are home free and if you win two and lose one you still ahead ...
If you win once and lose two you accept a small loss ...
And if you are really unlucky you lose three in a row ...
.
As we can see this set cruel and strict guide lines towards balancing on the blending edge.
Small and realistic win goals make us win more often and much easy to achieve.
But that does in return not allow us to use a big spread of units to have a big loss limit as it is in relation towards our win goal, as mention above ...
.
It also define that if you are going to play even money bets and have 1,5K then you don't get much room for error.
As you would divide 1200 mention above into four 400 400 400 400 ...
If you play and time pass by and you succeed doubled one small bank into 800, then your overall bankroll will grow.
Then we would have 2000 and divided into four 500 500 500 500 ...
.
But if we lose 400 we would have 800 and divide it into four 200 200 200 200 ...
.

Cheers

thank you very much 

I got better results using the six lines.
Trending for domination.

I think this is due that i bet what is current and present against sleepers that has no show.
it's a even money bet hybrid using even money and dozen position to win and break even.

This might work as trending for domination with regression or just flat betting.
This might pass and gain 100 with 1000 placed bets.

2013 04 11

WWL
WL
WL
WWL
LW
LW
WL
LW
WWWL
WL
WL
LW
WWWWL
WWWWL
LW
WL
WWL
LW
WL
LW
LW
LL
LW

+13 Entering points
-3 Exit points
+9 Break even points

2013 04 12

WL
WWL
WWL
WWWWWWWWL
LW
WWL
LW
WWWWWWWL
WL
WL
WL
WL
LW
LW
WL
WL

+12 Entering points
-0 Exit points
+4 Break even points

You can not outguess 50/50 distribution.
My opinion is that if you are looking for a high strike distribution, then you might want to use a algorithm/march where you can break even if you don't jump on board domination at the very first attempt.

That way you keep a tight variance with short losing strings, a tight game plan.
Where you have 50% to hit strikes trending for domination and 80% to 85% to break even and restart your attack.
This is what i regard as optimal bet selection.