hg doesn't mean
you bet straight away
when you sit at the table.

1)waiting for extreme variance to pass.

you wait out, for advantage,
in oversimplified eg.
streak of losses is often recurring event.
you often see 4,5,6,7..
even 10 losses in row.
why take the obvious
losing risk?
thus only fools won't wait.

2) understand the logic of rtm.

in simple logic, after extreme,
win lose ratio will move toward, "math expectation", in long term.
thus become a  more 'stable' ratio.

3)random virtual limit.
understand something won't
happened ...
in your lifetime...

four zeros won't hit when you bet green.
40black in row won't happen,
in EC, only 30hit/100 and  68hit/200spins won't happen when you bet,(69/200 record still hold).
simply mean an extra extreme variance,
you won't see when you bet in your lifetime!

4) progression that withstand the extreme virtual limit , if the 'unexpected' expected virtual limit variance hit, your progression can withstand it.

5)bet selection that
always selective to ,
wait to bet and stop bet, when extreme and virtual limit hit.

oversimplified eg.
we know 30/100 or 69/200 the known limit in EC.
now i wanna bet, say, 'player', baccarat.
i wait for ,say, 7,8,9, or even 10 banker.
if i wait for, say,  after 10 banker hit,
(then v-limit 30/100, simply mean
there "would be " at least ,
30player in next 90hand, that's 33%.)

and applying Albalaha's variance avoidance strategy, stop betting after say, 4losses in row, thus outwait potential, streaks of losses...and resume when a win hit.

Extreme Variance Management as I illustrated in a topic of mine is only way to get rid of the worst but yet one may face bad and unbeatable moments so I shifted my focus from any trigger based strategy with pauses to an all over strategy without any pause. I can handle even the worst that one might not have seen ever, so I am not worried of any extremities.