Lately I was thinking about probability in general and I'd like to share these thoughts with you, perhaps we could reach an understanding, a consensus if we really try.
So here is my first question:
1) If we would record 100 results per time, wouldn't be more probable to witness an unequal distribution (at any degree above even) among equal chance options?
I don't have to test it, I know it is true and not not only is true but also is valid every time for everything.
2) Realizing the answer regarding the first question then the next reasonable question is; how such fact could be exploited, how can we make use of such information?
Thus we are certain for something, anything will be ahead, will lead but we don't know which and when.
When some options are under-performing it is because their counterparts are over-performing, you cannot have one without the other, period.
3) How could we know which and when?
I'm going to reply this by the following wise quote: "A journey of 1,000 miles begins with a single step..."
Recall in retrospective a snapshot of 37 results, we could say: "Oh, number 35 came 4 times, if I was betting that number..."
How could we knew, what criteria would make us select the specific bet option?
Any bet selection before it grows exponentially begins with 1 single appearance.
Can you argue with these facts
Regardless of what that selection may be, there are always leaders and followers, the real question is: "Do we want to be with the leader?"
Starting by the ECs all the way down to numbers is a long way for something, anything to take the lead.
Each and every bet option has its own betting cycle, when a leader cannot lead any more we are replacing it with another, but no matter which there is always a leader.
We have to extend our event's horizon in order to be able to accommodate minor fluctuations during our march towards the goal.
We need a total of results which could be easily divided in cycles for each and every bet option, for example 72, it's:
36 cycles for ECs
24 cycles for dozens and columns
12 cycles for lines
8 cycles for quads
6 cycles for streets
4 cycles for splits
2 cycles for numbers
All of them are happening simultaneously and are using the universal currency of time, we only adjust our position when we have to and only as much as needed.
A leader could extend its lead or let its followers to catch up, even when numbers proceed hand by hand some other bet options are not progressing so harmoniously, what is happening for 1 number is not the same for more numbers as a group...