Since engaging in this forum I have encountered a number of different personalities. This for me is a good thing because I am learning from such people. It's fantastic honest knowledge I couldn't have ordinarily obtained. It's informing me and broadening my understanding on what gamblers and those who write about gambling really think. I mean I already knew a certain amount via verbal communications over the years but when you read what people think it opens up wider topics that will come in useful for me in trying to understand the issues members present. Some are critical of me because I create systems. Some do not believe in systems, others hate me because I write about systems and on and on. This forum is about gambling and betting etc. Those that don't believe in systems enjoy attacking me. All characters are different yet united in doubt and in a sense of loss and hopelessness. They express this by lashing out. This I can understand. They try to control a clique that says that there can be no set of rules, modes of play, systems, strategies that can combat the game of Baccarat. For a game to be won or at least attempted to be won, a player must have a plan, a mode of play. They seem to have their own ways of playing but don't like others promoting theirs. Their ways of playing are mostly based on feelings. I understand this too and they are entitled to their feelings that instruct them when and what to bet on. The point is though the clique tries to maintain the stance that system creators such as me are not welcome to advertise on this forum, their sheer attempts to rid of me informs me much about them that as I wrote will come in handy. I'm analyzing each type of member's posts and building up profiles that for me form topics. I'll reveal my findings in my forthcoming book. I think this will assist readers in working through the noise as I have encountered and therefore readers of my books will be better able to concentrate on the card game that is Baccarat. So I would request that members continue to engage in all the manners you have already been doing, each in your own way so that I can continue to examine the personality types in relation to my study. I enjoy your interactions be they on mathematics, on real or fake shoes, on posting neg shoes, on hating system creators, system believers, on sponsors, on sheer hate, on conspiracies, colluding, on the mob real or fictitious, on lime-lights, and insecurities, on BS, and boosting, on malice, on the $1,000 + workshops, on enjoying the buzz of running others down and many other instances. Whatever it is it's all very valuable to me and for my readers, now and in the future. It really adds to creating better information that forms the nature of the gambler that for the most part seems to be on the side of the house, the casinos. It informs me that such types are player hating types that hate it when players win and hope they lose. It's all very much welcomed. Including creating secondary and more member accounts to support points of their own posts and many other instances. So I say this, please continue just as you are because I really need to understand further what gamblers and those that write about them and the game are all about. And who knows, I might end up writing a PhD on it all. Thanking you all in advance for your further participation. Readers will be delighted to know more about the game of Baccarat and the personalities that seem to side with the house and the reasons why. 

I wonder who might respond first. One of the eight members beginning with the following first two letters perhaps: Ad / Al / Ba / Ba / Ji / Mi / Sc / Sp
8-1 odds on, or maybe I've put them off from doing so  damn I might even lose this bet now. I've put them off.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eyjrUAimzZg

I'll respond.

Try to learn what a paragraph is.

AD

He is excluded AD.  The same as those from Belle Glade would be.