Quote from: Gizmotron on September 04, 2016, 11:28:10 PM

So what are you going to do when you move out of your Mom's and Dad's house when you are 40?

I'm going to charge 200 for teaching how to read randomness.

Might have to cut him a little bit of slack, he's getting a really rough ride at the gamblingforums web site

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 05, 2016, 12:03:55 AM
I'm going to charge 200 for teaching how to read randomness.

It's too late, that horse has left the barn. Why don't you teach tolerance to math Nazis instead. There is the world before my revelations are known and the world after that, where you can let everyone in on your secret recipe for Crow à la Mode.

QuoteReply:
What prompted you  to ask if I am native American?

ND

There are plenty native American casino owners at USA thanks to US compensation plan.
You could be one of them, just a wildguess.

Quote from: Mike on September 04, 2016, 11:17:40 AM
@ Blue_Angel,

No I'm not the Wizard of Odds. Different Mike.

Thanks for the system, I'll get back to you later with the results of my tests.

I agree with this. If Gizmo's strategy attempts to take advantage of 'coincidences' then results should be no better than expectation. Only if it identifies and exploits consistent patterns can it claim to get results BETTER than expectation.

By the way, this system is from TurboGenius.
Don't underestimate it because of its simplicity.

Quoteeverything Steve says in his explanation is correct.you guys need to read his post carefully as it must be kept in mind that we only focused on one particular diamond and we are getting a 1 in 5 hit rate and it was not only the fifteen spins that has been mentioned, this pattern repeated over the 100 spins and was consistent.

everyone, Steve is no scammer and has contributed a lot on RR a few years back and helped me a lot.

Ronjo

@ Steve

1) In roulette you don't get paid by finding which diamond the ball will hit.
2) Don't you think 115 spins are just a tiny sample?
How do you expect 1,000,000 spins evidence for a winning method when your proof is just 115 spins?!
3) I don't Ronjo but he admits that you ''helped'' him...
4) You said that the ''free'' version runs through a web server, what if there is a blackout?
What if the server get hacked?
What if the video feedback delayed latency and is choppy?
What if casino staff get you video-streaming the wheel, what excuse your clients should tell, doing it for having casino's memorabilia?
5) What if the dealer spins the ball and the rotor softer and harder for each spin?
6) What if they apply a new rule that no bets allowed after the release of the ball?
7) Regardless of a device's effectiveness, I don't use any, it's just a matter of principle.
By the way, I consider Jafko's ''Pred7'' the best in roulette computers.

I could mention many more issues for you, but these are the basics.

Quote from: Blue_Angel on September 05, 2016, 11:16:29 PM
By the way, this system is from TurboGenius.
Don't underestimate it because of its simplicity.

Actually it's not that simple, at least coding it isn't. Since you're betting a variable number of outcomes at different times, I suggest using the same triggers but then betting on two random numbers instead of the numbers in the street. Then if this alternative system generates the same results as Turbo's system it will show there is no advantage in it.

Generally speaking, this is what systems players don't do. They just ASSUME that their strategy has merit, but don't check whether the opposite or random bets work just as well. If betting some random selection after a trigger (whether it's a 'trend' or 'clumping' or whatever) gives the same results as betting on the selections which the system requires, then you have shown that the strategy is worthless. Basic logic.