Now I follow you and can see that you talk about two different things.
Ecart Play I will answer later.

Now you mention my great discovery using only three events with the odds 1 in 3 where you get tiny, medium and large bias among only two events.

Singles is one event
Series of two is one event
Series of three and higher is one event

I observe several baccarat shoes and regular random bits and the bias is the real thing.

For does who is familiar with Ellis work:
My discovery is much better then NOR that has a similar approach.
Someone could say my method is closer to some kind of SAP count.

Using my methodology you can play only one strong side, for example, banker or player side by itself.
Sometimes you can encounter singles and series of three and higher strike for 5 10 15 20 25 30 times in a row.
That is equal a direct win and a break-even decision W or LW.
No other solution offers such tight strike ratio.

Have done many great discoveries looking at the bias where two states out of three can be connected.
For example when singles and series of two overlaps to series of three and higher with singles.
If someone has the singles as the main dominant bet you can overlap between both for a whole shoe and even sometimes several shoes after each other.

So is interesting to see how three state also has the odds being 1 in 3.
Where two states can follow each other for several hours of real play.

The map is in front of you and is up to you to make up the decision making when and where to place bets.
Is easy to make a simple observation to see the bias where two events strike several times in a row.

This discovery has such great potential so you can develop and use it for trading Bitcoin or any other market and also sports betting.
It can be played using both sides of the coin or only one side.

You have:

Singles and series of two - one state
Singles and series of three and higher - one state
Series of two and series of three and higher - one state


Cheers

 Here is one example where two states last almost for eight hours using 300 trails from random org.
We bet singles and series of two and singles and series of three and higher.
If we encounter series of two and series of three and higher we lose four bets and that happens in the end.

Just want to illustrate that singles connect two states with each other and they can be hovering around the whole time during your visit to the casino.
That is a true and real bias, but there is other solutions and complex ideas how to continue when you reach the third state.

With this example, I use one strong side of the random bits.


2
2
2
1
2
1
1 L 1 -1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 -2
2 W 1 -1
1
2 W 1 +0
1
2 W 1 +1
2
1
1 L 1 +0
1 L 1 -1
2
1
2 W 1 +0
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 -1
1 W 1 +0
2
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +1
2
1
1 L 1 +0
1 W 1 +1
2
1
2 W 1 +2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +3
2
1
2 W 1 +4
1
1 L 1 +3
1 W 1 +4
2
1
2 W 1 +5
2
2
1
1 L 1 +4
1 W 1 +5
1
1
1
2
1
2 W 1 +6
2
1
1 L 1 +5
1 W 1 +6
1
2
1
2 W 1 +7
2
1
1 L 1 +6
2 L 1 +5
2
1
2 W 1 +6
2
1
1 L 1 +5
2 W 1 +6
1
2 W 1 +7
2
2
1
2 W 1 +8
2
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 +7
2 W 1 +8
1
1 L 1 +7
1 L 1 +6
2
2
1
1 L 1 +5
1 W 1 +6
1
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +7
1
2 W 1 +8
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +9
2
2
1
1 L 1 +8
1 W 1 +9
1
2
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 +8
2 L 1 +7
1
1 L 1 +6
2 W 1 +7
1
1 L 1 +6
2 W 1 +7
1
2 W 1 +8
1
2 W 1 +9
1
1 L 1 +8
2 W 1 +9
2
1
2 W 1 +10
1
2 W 1 +11
1
2 W 1 +12
2
2
1
2 W 1 +13
1
2 W 1 +14
2
1
1 L 1 +13
2 W 1 +14
1
2 W 1 +15
2
1
1 L 1 +14
1 L 1 +13
1
2
2
1
2 W 1 +14
1
2 W 1 +15
1
1 L 1 +14
1 W 1 +15
2
1
1 L 1 +14
2 L 1 +13
1
1 L 1 +12
2 W 1 +13
2
1
2 W 1 +14
1
1 L 1 +13
2 W 1 +14
2
1
2 W 1 +15
1
1 L 1 +14
2 W 1 +15
2
2
1
2 W 1 +16
1
2 W 1 +17
2
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +18
2
1
1 L 1 +17
2 W 1 +18
1
2 W 1 +19
1
2 W 1 +20
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +21
2
1
2 W 1 +22
1
2 W 1 +23
2
2
2
2
2
1
2 W 1 +24
1
2 W 1 +25
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 +24
1 L 1 +23
1
1
2
2
2
1
1 L 1 +22
2 L 1 +21
2
1
2
2
2
1
1 L
2
2
1
2 W
1
1 L
2 W
2
2
1
2 W
2
1
1 L
2 W
1
2 W
2
1
1 L
2 W
1
1 L
2 W
1
1
1
1
1
2
2

 THANK YOU  so much..need time to digest.. thanks again.

I can see how you got one bet which was   2  1    then bet 2

But how did you get the other bet...such as the 3rd bet from the top where you won the bet and the net result was a -1 and you had a 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 and you won the last 2 bet which I do not understand,

I agree with the poster above me. Not sure how he got them bets or why...