I think the win goal also can work reverse, lets say you win goal is three units - then you start from 0 to hit +3 then if you are down three units in the hole you aim to break even and are down -3 toward +0 (like having the same win goal twice) and if you fail then you go all they way hitting loss limit.
.
That is a pretty solid methodology ... or you could put it like this ... we have 2 chances out of 3 to succeed ...

QuoteOh. Really? I forget that you can fly too.   

We can all fly, they call them airlines

Quote
P.S.: You should always stick to your play, if it can win in all probabilities.

You don't need guidance you already have stated you have many HG's but you're still knocking everyone, probably because they won't pay for your methods

I don't play to make a living, I don't need to, this is my last reply to you

Quote from: Superman on March 28, 2013, 01:15:12 PM
there's that word again, method, I doubt there will ever be one that works on an a-b-c system, sad but true.

Perhaps in the combination of several methods may we see something better. Or is it your experience that to have multiple methods is the same?

wait for this
then do method a
if lose - do method b
if win - do method c

Or is there something in the multitude of methods in your opinion.

Thank you.

QuoteOr is it your experience that to have multiple methods is the same?

Yes, because we could only jump to another method after one has failed, when we jump would probably be the wrong time too. We only know after the fact what would have worked prior.

The easiest way to play random is follow what's happening, this will either tell you to follow the last or opposite to last, we know we get series and singles, the length of them is all that's different, this is what I base my play on although I prefer to follow the last most of the time, during a chop or RRBBRRBB 2's I would usually drop to 1 unit until I 'think' its ending, I never try to recover all in one bet either if I am behind.

Superman  (My letter between D and G does not work.)

I take it you don't like the word "method".  I'm sure you don't like system.  What about "way o* playing"?  What do you call your play?

This is my_____________________.

I* you can win every session, you are good.  No, you are exceptional. 

Sam

So Sams keyboard is a bit F'd 

QuoteThis is my_____________________.

way of Playing

Quote from: VLS on March 27, 2013, 10:05:27 PM
1) Powered by a Flat betting advantage.

I would change point one in this topic where regression is superior then flat betting ...
With regression you always hold a profit after each win and you capitalize more on hot strikes then flat betting.
You also capitalize on zig zag distribution where flat betting break even.
Regression put you more into the positive side of things when flat betting even out ...

Yes, Superman, my eph does not work.  Hope(eph)ully it will dry out more and start working.  Kauphgy and computers don't' mix!

Like Ol' Blue Eyes, you do it your way!

Sam

Quote[size=78%]I would change point one in this topic where regression is superior then flat betting ...[/size]


With regression you always hold a profit after each win and you capitalize more on hot strikes then flat betting.
You also capitalize on zig zag distribution where flat betting break even.
Regression put you more into the positive side of things when flat betting even out ...

Nothing is inferior or superior and none has proven advantage over all others. Every betselection and progressions/MMs are proportional and work better than other in different conditions.

QuoteNothing is inferior or superior and none has proven advantage over all others. Every betselection and progressions/MMs are proportional and work better than other in different conditions.

-
You are welcome to show me in what situation flat betting is better then regression, feel welcome doing so ...

Really? I can put a few real smartlive sessions here where I will play an EC flat bet and you with regression. Ok?

-
I ask you to show me how flat betting can be better in some situations then regression ...
I don't play online casinos and are not interested comparing my methods with your methods, but i still would like you to show me how flat betting can be better then regression.
I can just not see how it can be so, feel free to open my mind and eyes so i can see the light ...

I am playing Red and you are playing black. I am doing flat betting and you go by regression. Hopefully, it will sprinkle some water on you.

[attachimg=1]

I am with Victor here.  Compounding is a very powerful concept.

One big bank, turned into a dozen little banks all working independently towards a common goal of each being "friggin huge" (it's a trade term) banks on their own.  Plus, like has been said...we don't have to wait a year for each to compound...each one can move every day you play.  Start with small units and increase unit size as each of your "mini" banks grow.  Not getting too big too fast keeps you in the game in case of a really bad run and there's nothing wrong with winning a little less versus losing alot more. 

Compounding is the building block on top of a foundation of good bet selection.  Get rich slow (slow meaning not overnight) instead of getting broke fast...it's just common sense and good business planning.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 29, 2013, 10:04:18 AM
I am playing Red and you are playing black. I am doing flat betting and you go by regression. Hopefully, it will sprinkle some water on you.

[attachimg=1]

Lets assume you play each time red show ...
Why don't you just tell us that it takes 3 reds to win 1 unit if you follow red ...
4 reds to win 2 units and 5 reds to win 3 units ...
-
Lets assume you just play red as it is ...
Then it takes 2 reds to win 1 unit and it takes 3 reds to win 2 units and so on ...
-
I can't still see how regression and up and pull would lose if you where flat betting and we play red.