Spike, you only have your name calling. You have your little EC bet and your blowhard attitude. And your biggest thrill of them all. You are a self appointed savior. And you are stuck on me. Now how intelligent is that.

It's time for you to contribute. It's time to prove your more than an internets stalker. It's either that or I'll post in threads where everything you say will be removed.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 03, 2013, 06:16:35 AM

It's time for you to contribute.

Exposing you is my contribution. Small as it is..

Quote from: spike on February 03, 2013, 02:29:31 PM

Exposing you is my contribution. Small as it is..

You have only exposed yourself. That was my goal. I got you to admit to your agenda. How do you like being manipulated?

Nobody that has considered using my list of characteristics of randomness, my charting system as a concept or guide to any tracked groupings, or my revolutionary idea of playing against the effectiveness track has expressed a sense of danger or warning regarding me sharing it.

If I have done a poor job of communicating my methods then I'm sure it's because I didn't listen much in school. Still, it seems that most people have either forgiven or ignored that process. It seems that you Spike are all alone in your quest to rid the world of your demon. I've shared what I call reading randomness. You shared flat betting, HAR, and making an educated guess where you play to win $100 and then leave. Your vast contribution in the past six years has been, to say the most, underwhelming.

Consider yourself as ignore status.

Spike just had a comment. He said that 90% can't understand my concepts and methods. If that's true then ask questions. Unlike Spike, I'll try to answer them.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 03, 2013, 09:00:24 PM
Spike just had a comment. He said that 90% can't understand my concepts and methods. If that's true then ask questions. Unlike Spike, I'll try to answer them.

well, i have a question for both of you
why don't you get alone? you are very smart, surely you can invent many very good systems together so why not work together?

also how do you both play roulette? what systems do you use or what kind of aproach?
gizmo you use random, patterns and trends if I am right?
what about you spike?

well, you said to ask so...

The only system that I have is to look at what the last spin results were. They confirm the continuation of the trend or pattern. They confirm the possible end to a trend or pattern. From that single bit of information what to do next is configured. I've explained that extensively.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 03, 2013, 09:22:13 PM
The only system that I have is to look at what the last spin results were. They confirm the continuation of the trend or pattern. They confirm the possible end to a trend or pattern. From that single bit of information what to do next is configured. I've explained that extensively.

yes, I know Gizmo, but ie I can't find anything from spike
I don't know if he plays the same as you but I really think you two should team up
even if you don't agree on certain things you can make that a good thing

Quote from: soggett on February 04, 2013, 08:43:10 AM

yes, I know Gizmo, but ie I can't find anything from spike
I don't know if he plays the same as you but I really think you two should team up
even if you don't agree on certain things you can make that a good thing

I don't need to carry him. He rides the casino bus & plays for $100 a visit. He's is clueless when it comes to taking advantage of spectacular opportunities. He says he doesn't need to. But it's clear to me that it's mostly ignorance on his part. He can learn from the real expert on randomness any time he wants to. But he enjoys surrounding himself with the masses of uninformed gamblers. As long as he can fool them he gets his jolly's off. Just listen to why he is here. I angered him for sharing what I have. He became very bitter on the very day that I started sharing. All he is is a very angry boy. That is the simple truth here. He can join up with the has been marvels of the scrap heep. He's nothing but an internet troll.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 04, 2013, 02:38:31 PM
He's is clueless when it comes to taking advantage of spectacular opportunities.

What do those look like, exactly, I've never
seen one. All betting opportunities have
exactly the same chance of being right. Odd
that you think differently about that, what
with being a roulette expert and all. Maybe
you can enlighten us as to what bet in roulette
has a better chance of winning. You usually
hear this kind of thing from a newbie..

I'll bet there are people here that know what I mean by spectacular opportunities. I would really like to know if people really don't know what to do with a sleeping dozen that sleeps for thirty spins in a row. How about a sequence of singles in the dozens that lasts more than 20 spins in a row? Do people here ignore 20 reds in a row? Perhaps Spike is correct here. Maybe very few here play the very best opportunities. Maybe they are as clueless as Spike. Let's  see about that.

Quote from: spike on February 04, 2013, 02:54:04 PM

What do those look like, exactly, I've never
seen one. All betting opportunities have
exactly the same chance of being right. Odd
that you think differently about that, what
with being a roulette expert and all. Maybe
you can enlighten us as to what bet in roulette
has a better chance of winning. You usually
hear this kind of thing from a newbie..

Since I usually play a few repeating numbers I think my opportunity on a dozen sleeping for 30 spins or for 20 reds in a row is...get the hell outta the casino...because I likely just made a ton of money. 

On the off chance that it was 20 reds in a row AND a dozen sleeping for 30 in a row at the same time...well then I stick around...because I then own some stock in that casino. Hey where's the little smiley guy rolling around on the ground laughing his &ss off?

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 04, 2013, 03:15:16 PM
I'll bet there are people here that know what I mean by spectacular opportunities. I would really like to know if people really don't know what to do with a sleeping dozen that sleeps for thirty spins in a row. How about a sequence of singles in the dozens that lasts more than 20 spins in a row? Do people here ignore 20 reds in a row? Perhaps Spike is correct here. Maybe very few here play the very best opportunities. Maybe they are as clueless as Spike. Let's  see about that.

I don't care if you delete this Giz, this is the first time I've got what you are going on about regarding spectacular opportunities. And of course you oil up the machine and get ready to take full advantage of these gems.

And Spike is clueless if he thinks 5 reds in a row offers an equal opportunity to 20 reds in a row. THE LONGER THE WAIT, THE SOONER THE CHANGE.

So at least we get a solid insight into what you are thinking Giz. Unlike Spike.

THE LONGER THE WAIT, THE SOONER THE CHANGE.

Jl

The above is an undeniable truth.  Question is, when will the change come?  Ah, if we only knew.

By the way, who wants to wait around for 20 reds in a row?  I'm 66. 

Sam

Quote from: TwoCatSam on February 04, 2013, 06:03:00 PM
THE LONGER THE WAIT, THE SOONER THE CHANGE.

Jl

The above is an undeniable truth.  Question is, when will the change come?  Ah, if we only knew.

By the way, who wants to wait around for 20 reds in a row?  I'm 66. 

Sam

that's the problem Sam lol! Yeah I think its just an opportunist bet. You have several possibilities. But that's what I basically do. Find something as rare as 20 reds. But more playable.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 04, 2013, 03:15:16 PM
with a sleeping dozen that sleeps for thirty spins in a row.

Gamblers Fallacy sequences? You mean you think after
a bunch of events in a row, you are willing to bet your
whole BR on the next spin?

Of course you won't, because of GF. What you mean is,
the end of the sequence is near. DUH! But you can't
know exactly when it will end, nobody can. Like I said,
newbie stuff..