Quote from: alrelax on May 27, 2018, 11:52:29 PM
ASYM,  strong or weak, Streakinv or Antistreak, whatever you want to call it, either way is a strategy either way is playing to match what the presentments are, it doesn't matter it just depends on your vision, frame of mind,  that's what I've been trying to express in my numerous detailed threads. Some people call it streaks and some people call it anti streaks, it's a description but either way is very viable and either way is very winnable as well it's very losable.

But do one thing all the time and nothing is more guaranteed to lose than just that.

Naturally you are right, and that's why is so important to select at most our betting opportunities.
We could be right or wrong at the same level as betting every hand, yet with our very selected plan we are paying an inferior tax and trying to get advantage of RTM or statistical long term findings.

It's quite more likely to get a RRRRRBBBBB at roulette than a BBBBBPPPPP sequence at baccarat.

Imo such baccarat sequence is just one possible sequence over 1024 possibilities for 10 consecutive decisions. At roulette itlr the average probability to get AAAAABBBBB will be very close to 1:1024, at baccarat it isn't.

as.   

Favorable opportunities, the key in all business and gambling endeavors, IMO and I believe that of all expereinced players, no matter if they admit it or not.  If not, why risk the capital?? 

Variance acts in short term seem rare--might be--yes, but they will be there in one form--fashion--or another.  They have to.  It is just not the prespective of most gamblers I believe.  Sure, a 45 hand or so first half of a shoe without ties and F-7's and P-8's seems great, will 4 or 5 F-7's and 4 P-8's and 10 ties come within the next 20 hands??  We all know how most shoes finish.  The problem is being within those shoes and comparing all losses and wins to previous events and experiences and then you convince yourself, it is just not going to happen.  Then when you do stop attempting---then they come out.  Then it is too late and you are ultra frustrated and emotionally off balance. 

Once you are 'off-balance' it is not easy to play the right way with clear vision and complete neutrality. 

And also, resetting and refreshing has a lot more to do than just charting, when I say resetting and refreshing, it is meant to mean an entire neutral and clear vision, nothing to do with charting and starting over, etc., or anythign along those lines.  Clearly a huge game changer as I proved, but misunderstood by most all.  Re-charting has no control or balance in your play except for controlling a possible loss.

And also those that really think M.M.S. are flat betting with a pull here and there, etc., are not really into M.M.S. at all.  I say risk the buy-in and get some win.  Then your M.M.S. has to govern your play and if you can win, your M.M.S. will allow you to continue and when you lose it will run you out of money after (and only after) you already got your buy-in back and a win.  There is a huge difference about what someone is saying here with a simple MMS.  When I properly employ my MMS I am able to have the power and the funds to risk, but the best part of it is that I already recouped my buy-in and have a 2 or 3 time buy-in capital risk profit.  I guess I just go for the bigger and the clusters rather than the few units here and there.  Why?  because  of the fact of being 'grinded down'.  Once I found the proper buy-in risk amount and had a mind set that, that was pure risk with no stop loss or win stop and then employed the MMS, it was like day and night. 

The whole key to it is the multiples of what I win, when I win and the ability to continually reset and refresh without preference or consious, etc. 

Quote from: Blue_Angel on May 28, 2018, 01:13:56 AM

"For a certain event..."
For example first 30 or so hands had a 5+ streak so he doesn't bet the anti-streak but instead let it ride for 5 times in a row in the 2nd half.
If 5 streak didn't occur during first half then goes for the  anti-streak beats.


Right?

Actually, more the opposite of what you outline, hey hey.