Hey Carlitos . . .

No need for RX as I have a Tracker that shows the Dozen, Column, and EC for the last number spun.

Hope this helps . . .

Nick

Thanks, Nick.......

Trere is also this one.

Thanks, Normy........

that's sounds great Nick and Normy 






Carlitos 

Hi!
I found this on Gamler`s glen.
agesta
Yes it is quite a joke.

Here it is [Drum Roll]

The basic bet is bet penultimate on all  even chances.
So that is the spin before the last one
eg. RB  Next bet is red, LH bet Low, OE bet odd.

Place that bet for minimum table amount, that is the no win no lose bet.
That just helps to keep you at the table.

The real bet is this.
This is the bet that you play for the big bucks.
After 2 or more of the same and then a change eg. RRB or BBBBBBR
then bet for another change, ie. opposite to the last outcome.
If you win the bet, bet again same as last decision, so RRRBR >>>NOW BET R.
Again this is played on all  even chances.

********That is it*****
Feel free to try it, it is fairly safe but has just as much chance of losing as it does of winning.
It is a big steaming pile of dog stuff just like Charles Edward Hampshire or whatever his real name is.
ACETF my behind. 3 million a year my behind. Charles you behind.
*********
"Charles" does sell this bet, contrary to what he would have you believe, to get hold of it, besides paying him 3 grand you also have to pledge a minimum of £104,000 per year to the ACETF? What a great man!

The Link!
http://www.gamblersglen.com/cgi-bin/teemz/teemz.cgi?board=_master&action=opentopic&forum=Roulette_Message_Board&topic=8193
agesta

Thanks Agesta












Carlitos 

that is not a consistent winning bet as i see it

This the Boffins bet. And no it's not a CWB!

QuoteMeaning that has tested 30 sessions of 100 spins and almost all passed the test.(letting 1-2 sessions to end up with just a loss of less than 10 chips). 

" Almost passed the test ", thus, it did not pass the test as it lost. Not by much but CEH clearly said, it must passed the test and it will come out as an winner....




Then again, not bad performance i must admit. I do not think you have the CWB bet but if this one only loosses 1 or 2 perhaps the winning ones can make up for these 2 small losses.








Carlitos 

Fun topic ---easy fun read....  : one of shikamors statements is if a zero comes you only lose half your bet... could be a lead in this whodunnit......and I love his comments on health I m doing his cider vinegar thing!!!

Make a little room gents, i'm boarding this madman's train without shame. I spent lots of time on this puzzle bet never achieved the 29/30. I'm ready to spend a little more before i throw the towel and board the short bus. First question : Where is the puzzle? I was reading it in realtime, so many changes, deleted pages, offtopics, badmouthing and raving. Lot of stuff i forgot and what i saved died with the hard drive of my old PC. There is wayback machine but many holes in there.


Is this what we are looking for:


[size=78%]http://betselection.cc/6th-sense/roulette-gears-and-cogs-the-world-of-roulette/msg20247/#msg20247[/size]


I would be very grateful if 6th-sense could share this book with forum and join the discussion.


My thoughts on the bet later.
[/size]

ok my new guess is that there is some correlation to betting a dozen or a column depending on what the 3 ec's are doing?---time for a cup of coffee!!! off to casino in the morning, work work, work--im getting sick of those casinos . I need a vacation on an island with no casinos on shore!

Problems:


1) Bet construction
2) Movements
3) Formula
4) Reason




1) Bet construction - 4 chips, engineered bet, very interesting part where it mentions "opposite bet", "bet has 2 parts"


Does every bet has it's opposite bet? You play 1 EC. What is opposite bet? EC again... same bet so to speak... opposite trigger is another thing, right? But - you play 1 dozen - opposite bet is different bet - 2 dozens


My wild guess would be 2 different bets, switching according to triggers:

Something like 1 DOZ + 1 COL + 2 EC vs 2 DOZ + 2 COL +