Quote from: spike on March 28, 2013, 01:12:11 AM
I don't remember in what thread you posted your HG
and I wanted a heads up, that's all. How about it?

I can be wrong but I do not think it is a single post but a summary of several given over time.

Like everything in life we have to put some effort. Reading it does not cost money. Effort is made ​​by the interested person as it is usual.

Quote from: Albalaha on March 28, 2013, 02:08:45 AM
having sessions like one with 3 million, two 1 million data and various hundreds of thousands of data

Unfortunately I do not think there is much interest in a system that spends up to 3 million draws to end a session.

I suppose it is as you say and is only usable by bots. The greater the session length the greater the chance for the casino to detect it nonetheless. Sessions with millions of sets surely attract much more attention in casino audits.

Please receive many omens as I hope the casino will not detect your system and you can make lots of money then show the forum all the screenshots of wealth.

Greetings and abundance. Walter

I am busy into improving the bot further with adding more stuffs as I am not satisfied with the existing average winning per spin. It is not true that it can be played only upon very big sessions. Ophis, as said, is already using it, for weeks, in continuity.

Off course not, only an fool will do that 
Might give some hints here and there.....










Carlitos 

Just what are the distinguishing characteristics of a HG?

Until that's clarified posters will all have different concepts of what we're supposed to be publishing! (Or not publishing.)


Victor has offered some suggestions and a robust debate has ensued.

I suggest you take a look if you haven't already:  http://betselection.cc/general-discussion/the-%27holy-grail%27-should-be-realistic/

... well something that wins and makes you an profit.....those who have enough experience will notice the Holy Grail when they see it.... 








Carlitos 

What i we *ind the "Holy Grail" is a lot o* work?

Superman has it and he can't bot it.  Maybe he makes enough to make it worthwhile.

I get bored.  *all asleep.

Sam

(I'll get my eph back soon.)

QuoteWhat i we *ind the "Holy Grail" is a lot o* work?

I agree, a lot of work it is.

QuoteSuperman has it and he can't bot it.  Maybe he makes enough to make it worthwhile

I wouldn't call what I have a HG, it's too much effort in concentration and when it's struggling to recover it works on your mind very heavily. In my opinion a HG should have a higher win rate than the odds dictate, which would allow flat betting to avoid the hard grinding that is emotionally draining.

 
A grail will never be ABC

Its adapting to the current conditions you are faced with whilst at the same time watching for change

but I can't get it right lol

Quote from: D1 on March 29, 2013, 06:19:15 PM

A grail will never be ABC

Yes it will. It will be the compilation of experts, taking my writings from this forum, and the source code written in xTalk, the only speech oriented syntactic language, and taking all of it to explain in common terms how it works and why it works. None of that will happen until the proof is delivered.

Quote from: Gizmotron on March 29, 2013, 06:36:29 PM
Yes it will. It will be the compilation of experts, taking my writings from this forum, and the source code written in xTalk, the only speech oriented syntactic language, and taking all of it to explain in common terms how it works and why it works. None of that will happen until the proof is delivered.

EXACTLY !!!

that's why it will never be ABC

Quote from: Gizmotron on March 29, 2013, 06:36:29 PM
Yes it will. It will be the compilation of experts,

[mod] A deliberately provocative post. He's been warned before about deliberately baiting Gizmotron. So now he has to wear the consequences. [/mod]

......nobody says that the HG would be easy....... you may need to work for it....








Carlitos 

Quote from: D1 on March 29, 2013, 06:52:59 PM

EXACTLY !!!

that's why it will never be ABC

To me, what I said, is as simple as ABC. Reading source code is no more complex as simple arithmetic is. If you know the language and the compilation of very simple processes then it can be done easily. What I meant to say is that so called intelligent people will explain it to those uneducated folks who have not educated themselves.

 
Well I agree with you there Giz

that's me one of the uneducated

Quote from: D1 on March 29, 2013, 10:01:37 PM

Well I agree with you there Giz

that's me one of the uneducated

Well some really smart person will explain to all of us. Turning mathematics on its ear will be fun to watch.