You can not win with flat bet? Gentlemen, of course you can: http://youtu.be/eshMueFWCtI

Tapalov, I am not getting it. Are you able to explain a little more?

I only scoring with the calculator according to the position I play, such as playing a dozen, most to the calculator 12 are the numbers covered , we cover that position if I play three times for 36 dozen one hand that would bring the coverage , counting numbers bear that expense and on the other hand when I divide those numbers from 36 is to bring an indicator on the successes that are supposed to approximate only the universes that I have arrears or in advance in relation to the successes, 36 numbers I spent one success and keeping track on the rx down the screen leaving the hits makes me wear
If you look closely at the moves I do, you'll notice that if I go past successes, down a chance to ( fail) or at least try , because in while spending more numbers ( 18 ) than any other position of roulette , and you'll ask and if you fail? For nothing we keep winning which is not bad, but doing so with one value chip because I had few options to lower - value but the idea was conceptual and foremost on rate and coverage, but good because you try to explain how to balance the rate of successes, and the other question of whether going with lack of hits ( all this supposedly) as roulette then does what he wants , but hey, perdere if I happen to lose , just enough but no more , also if you realize the video fractionation using block ( using blocks of 36 so it would look better with less mess ) example : I start in a dozen and if I hit the 24 numbers fractionated two dozen quedarian me to play to meet the block of 36 numbers instead to follow two dozen shots ( 24 numbers) do four shots to seisena ( 24 numbers too) then another course : success in seisena (possible positive peak ) on the first shot because I quedarian to play 18 numbers , then those three shots fractionated kedan me to fractionating seisena still more , 6 shots on a street ( 18 numbers) that is looking levels , valid to take advantage of the peaks that give us less coverage and higher rate of pay

---

[reveal=Original in spanish]solo voy anotando con la calculadora segun la postura que juego , ejemplo juego una docena sumo a la calculadora 12 que son los numeros que abarca , vamos cobertura de esa postura si juego tres veces seguidas la docena pues 36  eso por un lado  seria llevar la cobertura, llevar el conteo de numeros que gasto y por otro lado cuando divido  esos numeros entre 36  es por llevar un indicador sobre los aciertos que se supone , solo orientativo  los universos que llevo de atrasos o  de adelanto  en relacion con los aciertos, 36 numeros gastados 1 acierto  y voy llevando un control , en el rx la pantalla que sale abajo me pone los aciertos que llevo
Si te fijas bien en las jugadas que hago , te daras cuenta que si voy pasado de aciertos , baje a chance  para( fallar ) o al menos intentarlo  , ya que  en chance gasto mas numeros (18) que en cualquier otra postura de la ruleta, y te preguntaras  y si no fallas? , pues nada  seguimos ganando que tampoco es malo, pero al hacerlo con ficha de valor 1  pues tenia pocas opciones de bajar el valor- pero la idea conceptual y primordial era sobre tasa y cobertura, pero bueno ya te explique como intento equilibrar la tasa de aciertos , y a la otra pregunta de si voy con falta de aciertos (todo esto supuestamente ) ya que la ruleta  despues hace lo que quiere , pero bueno, perdere si me toca perder, lo justo pero no mas, tambien  si te das cuentas del video uso fraccionamiento del bloque (uso bloques de 36 para que se viera mejor y con menos lio)  ejemplo: empiezo en docena y si acierto fracciono los 24 numeros de las dos docenas que me quedarian  por jugar para cumplir el bloque de 36 numeros, en vez de seguir dos tiros en docena (24 numeros) hago cuatro tiros a seisena (24 numeros tambien) luego otro supuesto: acierto en seisena (posible pico positivo)  en el primer tiro pues me quedarian que jugar 18 numeros , pues fracciono esos tres tiros que me kedan en seisena fraccionando todavia mas , 6 tiros a una calle (18 numeros) eso es buscar niveles , validos  para sacar aprovechamiento de  los picos que se nos den  con menos cobertura y mayor tasa de pago [/reveal]

Hi Tapalov


Welcome to the forum.


I am very curious of your way of playing and appreciate that you posted your method.


Although I get the jist of what you're doing.


You are Spanish and I am English and the Spanish-English translator sites do as good a job as they can to tanslate.


But much of the meanings are lost when translated.




I would greatly appreciate someone with a Spanish-Natural English ability take the time and translate this text in a more Natural English.




Thanks in advance to whoever takes on the task.




B

which has many echos studies on the subject of roulette, I never machined anything just playing as I see, watching my hit rate, coverage numbers, levels etc, many concepts are to be taken into account when playing a session of roulette and only guided me, success or failure if I never see the numbers as such, in this model there are the numbers game, roulette veil with only two options, success or failure
can not predict what will come out but if that I can hit or miss and consequently that game so

Sure one can....playing 2 comp.on tables 1 and 2  DB manually last few weeks...ALL  FLAT BET...
20-22 numb.each bet 18x 1 euro.....getting adv.over the house as if topp. even money bet....HOW COME ?
Do some close observe,maybe you get it.

funny....someone using a language translator reads like you are conversing with someone from England from the 16th Century....around the time of Henry VIII

Quote from: Turner on November 13, 2013, 11:28:13 PM
funny....someone using a language translator reads like you are conversing with someone from England from the 16th Century....around the time of Henry VIII

well my ancestry is from 16th century England...somewhere across the last few centuries it didn't translate too well for me...maybe I need a new de-coder ring