Gizmo, it doesn't have to be hackable if you make it hardcopy only. In that case it won't be easily distributable because it won't be an electronic document, although if someone's determined enough they can always scan it. There's no foolproof way to protect it, really. If the method is explained on a forum then it can easily be copied and pasted into a word doc.

Anyway it's your choice of course. I assume you'll only be accepting a limited number of people on the forum on a first come, first served basis. I know testimonials don't really prove anything but I'd like to hear from any members who have learned your method.

If you write a manual and email it to someone, it will be copied and emailed to Macau, Vegas, Singapore, Australia etc etc in 24 hours so you are limited to only very few manuals you can sell.

To make money selling a method, you have to keep making "improvements" ( the Gold version or the Platinum version etc etc etc ) to the original method and sell them as a new updated better version of the original system and charge for live seminars to explain the new and improved method.......or start a school and charge  a fee for the school.

Personally I feel if someone has the money to spend on this stuff, that's their right............just don't expect to become a millionaire.

Copy protection is impossible these days. Just look at Hillary's email for an example.


I'm not really in this for the money. I expect this method to get out there someday. Just not before those that learn it become experts at taking down the casinos. I want them to have their chance. It could take a few years. This time they will be drilled in examples so that it is totally clear that they know what they are doing. I've taken a complicated method and deliberately simplified it. How long can that remain a secret? The casinos will adjust to it. You watch. It's not magic. There is no secret weakness to make the casinos fear it. It's just pure logic. But having it explained to the masses will in fact scare them.


I hope there is time for those that are joining in on this. Even if it were published it still takes experience to execute it. I'm trying to pass on that experience as fast as I can.

So it's going good. The students are asking questions and the answers are filling in the gaps. I fixed the Parlay thanks to Rick that noticed I published it wrong. I even fixed it here in case some of you noticed it. It's still a powerful tool if you can find a good time to use it.


So, should I try to get more people in the school? How do you do that? I already cut the price to less than half of the original price and I also added a specific tactic that actually works. It's all simplified into a simple to execute method. I'm discovering that each individual has a way of tweaking it to their own personal taste. I find that very interesting. It's going to morph slightly. That alone is very cool. I have not mentioned this outside of betselection.cc anywhere. Should I?


Mark

QuoteSo, should I try to get more people in the school?

Good question Gizmo.

On the one hand, you did promise to only accept 10 students........"you gave your word".........

On the other hand, you haven't kept your word up until now............so might was well.

Looking forward to hearing more about your fantasy school where you teach students how to win at Roulette!!!

Cheers!

Quote from: TheLaw on August 22, 2016, 10:50:29 PM
Good question Gizmo.

On the one hand, you did promise to only accept 10 students........"you gave your word".........

On the other hand, you haven't kept your word up until now............so might was well.

Looking forward to hearing more about your fantasy school where you teach students how to win at Roulette!!!

Cheers!

So this whole thing started because Mike ticked me off. You at least openly discuss it as if it's pure excrement.


So here is the deal with the first ten. I taught them and then waited two years. Then I published almost all the secrets here for the next three years. Then I got ticked off. Screw those that think I owe the world my silence and that includes anyone trying to lay a guilt trip on me. Know anyone?


In that time I discovered something Spike tried to suggest to me. He can get thrown under the bus too. I'm acting on what his suggestions meant to me, even if they were not what he meant in the first place. No matter what, I discovered two very new things that are very important to my method. So here we are. I told the first ten that they had two years for sure. I kept my word. If that isn't good enough for you then you can eat the sentiments of the implication of my school's impression on you. The Law, are you a narcissistic effigy of a symptom gone wild? That's right, you dish it out, but can you take it.

QuoteThat's right, you dish it out, but can you take it.

Well......when I make a promise.......I keep it.

All of this drama you've created around your "method" looks like more smoke and mirrors. If you do have a working method, you sure have a strange way of describing it.

Bottom line : In well over a decade on Roulette forums + the 200+ years the game has been in play, we have yet to see a method that wins long-term.

Now.......you claim that you have taught this method to 10 "students", who are strangely absent, and now you are teaching more..........for a price.

With all due respect Gizmotron.........you might be the emperor..............but as everyone can see....you are wearing no clothes.

Perhaps Lawman, but has everything really all been said? You are just a protagonist insinuating that your are most likely correct.


I have fought the good fight for ten years with educated guessing, reading randomness, elegant patterns, global effect, effectiveness states, and a full list of the characteristics of randomness. I even told everyone to look at the short duration trends.


All you have done is chant "independent spins can't predict the future." Like we don't know that. jeez

QuoteAll you have done is chant "independent spins can't predict the future." Like we don't know that. jeez

Never said or wrote that.

Great claims require great evidence..........you have shown none........and now you want respect.

Respect is earned........not from "hints" or "riddles" , but actual detailed explanation of a method.

When you have a method to show........without all of the song-and-dance victim mentality.......I'm all ears.......and I'll be the first to applaud you.

You act like talking about Roulette.......is like dancing about architecture.

Quote from: TheLaw on August 23, 2016, 12:38:58 AM
You act like talking about Roulette.......is like dancing about architecture.

I assure you that chewing up architects for a living was the national pastime for me. But that is another story. Here's the dirty little secret. County inspectors or rejects from architect's school who think they are qualified engineers. And architects themselves are lazy intellectuals that think they can bluff their way through their own mistakes. Here's the professional secret. When they charge you to fix their F-Ups, you charge them right back for the same amount, for pointing them out in the first place. It doesn't completely suck to be the builder in charge.


Better try a new metaphor bub.

Quote from: Gizmotron on August 23, 2016, 12:54:24 AM

I assure you that chewing up architects for a living was the national pastime for me. But that is another story. Here's the dirty little secret. County inspectors or rejects from architect's school who think they are qualified engineers. And architects themselves are lazy intellectuals that think they can bluff their way through their own mistakes. Here's the professional secret. When they charge you to fix their F-Ups, you charge them right back for the same amount, for pointing them out in the first place. It doesn't completely suck to be the builder in charge.


Better try a new metaphor bub.

Actually.........it's a quote from Martin Mull about art that I used here as a metaphor to describe your evasiveness regarding the discussion of Roulette.

Hint:........it has nothing to do with architecture.

It's my fault for talking over your head............please accept my apologies.

Cheers! 

Quote from: TheLaw on August 23, 2016, 01:18:11 AM
Actually.........it's a quote from Martin Mull about art that I used here as a metaphor to describe your evasiveness regarding the discussion of Roulette.

Hint:........it has nothing to do with architecture.

It's my fault for talking over your head............please accept my apologies.

Cheers! 

I'm not inept when it comes to communication and metaphorical references. I just tried to pull your chain. As far as that declaration of superiority regarding the same I do appreciate that narcissism indication once again. I will never be your narcissistic supply. ...There is no reason to yell. I have students that have been shown how to beat this game. It's so gratifying to see that. Too bad it's beyond your reach. Why don't you open a school for architects?

Quote from: Gizmotron on August 23, 2016, 12:54:24 AM

I assure you that chewing up architects for a living was the national pastime for me. But that is another story. Here's the dirty little secret. County inspectors or rejects from architect's school who think they are qualified engineers. And architects themselves are lazy intellectuals that think they can bluff their way through their own mistakes. Here's the professional secret. When they charge you to fix their F-Ups, you charge them right back for the same amount, for pointing them out in the first place. It doesn't completely suck to be the builder in charge.


Better try a new metaphor bub.

Oh dear. Did I hear the word 'Architect' ?

In litigious USA would you care to be more specific as to the specific professional you cite?

This Architect ( xxvv) is not a 'lazy intellectual', and throughout my 43 years of professional practice ( domestic to commercial) in NZ, Australia, and overseas in pacific islands, as well as 12 years with a busy commercial practice in an emerging buoyant booming Port Moresby PNG, no one has ever accused me of that, but I have certainly heard and seen many viewpoints from Builders, sometimes very critical of course, but also sometimes offering congratulations.

Building is a team effort and everyone, I mean everyone, is important to bring their collective skills to the table, where literally the end result is more than the sum of the parts, at best. At worst there are complications and as with any profession there are majors, mediums, and also minors. Like much in society our reputation is precious and yes we are only as good as our last work. Doctors can bury their mistakes but Architects have to grow vines to hide theirs (FLW).

In New Zealand, the tradition has been, until recently with increasing BIM documentation and some specialisation, that Architects were exceptional good all-rounders. We were able to do a lot of things really well, and adapted well to change or challenge because of relative isolation. The NZ farmer is also famous for the #8 wire solution, a tradition of improvisation and entrepreneurial flexibilty developed by necessity - the mother of invention.

So it is surprising Gizmo to hear you generalise so fundamentally in the land where my hero Frank Lloyd Wright ( he had his enemies also) and the ageless Frank Gehry ( some people hate his work also but refer to the Lou Ruvo Centre Hospital for Brain Health he designed in Las Vegas - seek the Founder's views on the role of the Architect there) produce wonders with very colourful very full lives - both did and will work into their nineties.

Never wise to generalise Gizmo because you lose credibility as there are always exceptions.

The gripes of Builders on house sites may be common but, as in all areas of life we do better when we realize we are all inter-dependent, and the trick ( which I try with students/ builders/clients) is to see the essential uniqueness in every individual and bring that, the best, out in everyone. Even a 10% strike rate makes a big difference in your life experience, and thus results.

Now we know that 'Mr' Law is quite challenging, to the point of cynicism, however view this as an opportunity ( thank 'Mr' Law) to dig deep and explain yourself with new found crystal clarity. Avoid generalisations as they are always flawed.

Kind regards
R.  XXVV

Quote from: Gizmotron on August 23, 2016, 01:34:46 AM

I'm not inept when it comes to communication and metaphorical references. I just tried to pull your chain. As far as that declaration of superiority regarding the same I do appreciate that narcissism indication once again. I will never be your narcissistic supply. ...There is no reason to yell. I have students that have been shown how to beat this game. It's so gratifying to see that. Too bad it's beyond your reach. Why don't you open a school for architects?

That's a great idea..........as it appears that I apparently know about as much about architecture.........as you do about Roulette..........or do I?

Hell.......why not.......I'm the world's greatest architect!!!

Man.......this is easier than I thought.........thanks Gizmotron!

So what Lawman. You are hooked on your own petard.