Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Play Roulette like a stock trading professional

Started by Gizmotron, October 21, 2018, 06:40:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Gizmotron

So, I've had just about all I can take from these math wizards. It's time to teach everyone and to let the chips fall where they may in the world.


This is the home of all my secrets. It's always been at the betselection.cc forum. So this is where I will tell all. If a person wants to ridicule and insult anyone in this thread I will delete their posts. No apologizes. Keep it civil or I will remove the comment. You can be as PC incorrect as you can get away with. I don't care. But personal attacks with exceptions to posturing ones own intelligence versus any others will be squashed.


Everyone knows that I changed tactics 4 months ago or so. I have suggested many variations on the same theme. I opened my school to explore these things. I spent a lot of time watching others perfect a skill. That skill is trend and pattern recognition and MM tactics that fit it. Two weeks ago I discovered, at the suggestion of another, this video that explains an MM tactic based on ranges formed by moving trends in the stock market:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bRCtBRsLPmk&feature=youtu.be  ; 17 minutes


From that I formed a method to flip the concept and play Roulette like a professional stock player. The video caused me to step back and see an even bigger picture. I'm going to spell out that picture in detail. No hints anymore. This is how anyone can beat all the table games at the casino if they are based on chance.


I suggest to you that you watch the video so that you can know what I'm talking about. He explains why 90% of stock traders lose money. And that also explains why 99% of gamblers lose as well. The so called house advantage applies to any single bet but does not explain the earnings from gamblers in their corporate bottom line's. This video perpetuates that lie and just accepts it as fact. It is one of the greatest lies in history. All it is is an excuse to lose for those without a plan. People expect to lose so they go ahead and lose. They walk in the door expecting to lose. It's a wonderful scam.


The author of the video explains that the house expects to make 5.4% off of Roulette. But the corporate earnings yearly reports shows that most casinos make a whopping 14% or more each year from Roulette. Why the discrepancy? Haven't they heard of the absolute probability of the mathematics community? They don't care that people pay them more than they should I guess. Funny that...


I will teach everyone how to see favorable conditions. It's the same thing as the professional stock trader.


Let me know if you have seen the video and have questions.


"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

esoito

He's an excellent communicator, and I enjoyed his enthusiasm.

No questions from me. Yet.

Gizmotron

Wasn't that great. The guy just opened my eyes. I was almost there but he took me the rest of the way.


So, as I said, I took this trading method of seeking ranges that are historically working at the time and doing what traders do, if they are smart like this guy that is.


So just about everyone here knows that I used three net wins and out to make a single session worth while for me. I even tried some of John Patrick's "2, 1, 2" positive progressions to make it more interesting. This guy uses flat betting and beating the ranges by entering a trade early as it recovers and before it goes into resistance. He stays inside the already performing waves that are spelled out as ranges. He knows that there is no prediction. He expects to lose as much as 50% of the time. But he also gives himself an edge that comes form the performance of the moving averages. They are trends. The trends that he seeks tend to repeat in a pattern for him. Roulette does that too if you are trained to see characteristics and their moving averages also. You will lose 50% of the time too. But you will also have an edge because you will have win streaks that pay off at least twice as much as each lost attempt. When you do have some of the losses it will be at times when it costs you nothing.


This is possible because on a Roulette table you can use no-valued virtual bets that keep you in the bet selection process but have no impact as a cause for a declining bankroll. You must ride out the temporary downward trends by selling stocks in time. But you can keep charting the waves without succumbing to the results of continuous flat betting in Roulette. Getting out early in the stock market is the same as switching to a virtual bet. You wait for the next trend in both cases.


So the skill is having a playing plan and also having a knowledgeable skill at exploiting trends and patterns.



"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron

So, moving on. In the video you will learn the secrets to a winning strategy with key points made starting at minute 5:50 thru 7:00 and on to 8:20.

Fear. He says that most uninformed traders, the great 90% of the unwashed that is, are making investments with scared money. Now this topic has been discussed on gambling forums for decades. But nobody has put together all the little things that make up a kind of rules to win by if you bet on trends. A set of method recommendations can be programmed and simulated for testing if someone wants to put that much work into it. They do that much work in the stock market. And they charge up the wing-wang to gain access to it too.

He states that most people sell lower than they should when they are winning and hang on to a losing stock well past a logical point while it keeps descending. Gamblers do the same things because they don't have a plan.

Anyone can create telemetry on spin results that shows trends. I do it on index cards while playing live at a casino. I can see the ranges. I cans see the swarms of single characteristics. I can see "domination" where at least one next continuation is producing one win after a grouping changes sets. A grouping would be the 18 black combined with the 18 red. Each 18 numbers are sets of the main grouping. By watching these sets I can see patterns that tend to repeat. Sometimes it is that the trend is that when black hits, it only hits once before going back to more reds. And when reds hit they always hit as two or more hits. That kind of a bigger picture trend is good enough to win one time. There is no guarantee that it will win. There is no prediction that it will win. It only takes one bet to see if it will win, thus confirming that the trend is still continuing or not.

To some that simple method or logic is not valid. All it is is guessing. You might as well just place a guess without tracking past results. But if you just select bets (investments) randomly you won't have a bet selection process that can target 10 reds in a row. We all know that they occur. The random selection process will miss that opportunity. Now a random selection method will produce 10 wins in a row. It must. But you  won't have an identifier that a swarm of the same characteristic is occurring. That is why it is a good idea to have a bet selection method that identifies conditions. It won't change the odds and it won't guarantee that the big investment will win on the next spin. But it will provide you with a consistent method for bet selections. With that in mind you can use the data gathered by a simulation. And from that you can see the actual effectiveness of the conditions. That effectiveness is real. It is not a figure formation in a chart. It could be a figure formation like a trading chart in the stock market.


Example:



"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

alrelax

 Mark,

I hope you will stick around! 

Thanks for coming back, Glen. :thumbsup:
My Blog within BetSelection Board: https://betselection.cc/index.php?board=250.0

Played well over 36,311 shoes of baccarat since I started playing at B&M USA casinos.

THE PURPOSE OF GAMING IS TO WIN!

"Don't say it's a winning hand until you are getting paid for it".

Played numerous properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Southern California, Atlantic City, Connecticut, South Florida, The South/Southeast as well as most areas of The Midwest.

Baccarat, actually a mixture of Watergate, attacking the Gotti Family and the famous ear biting Tyson fight leading to disqualification and a near riot.  Bac has all that & more.
 
Administrator & Forum Board Owner  of  BetSelection.cc
EMAIL: Betselectionboard@Gmail.Com

Gizmotron

Thanks, I will stay around long enough to explain everything. Then those that know this will carry the water for it. You know a lot of it already. Your experience is monumental. Our Asian friend was right. You need to place bets that are at least 20 times larger than the base bet at times that make the most sense. I just can't figure out why he would struggle with that. All I have is using a strategy that reveals opportunities. It reveals all downward spirals before they can do extensive damage. And it's simple. That alone would protect the attacking bets.


Mark
"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron

So what skills are needed to read randomness?


The first skill is to get over the absurdity of the phrase itself. It is argued and believed that because randomness is random it can't be read. And people are debating causes for trends and patterns with arguments reaching into the fantasy that you can't see trends or patterns because they don't exist. I will demonstrate how to make a chart and read it for Roulette. When I see 35 spins of the same dozen go to sleep and not hit all in a row, and then I go on to name the sequence of spins an "Elegant Pattern," then I get the crazies coming out of the woodwork. It infuriates those that can't see what is clearly in front of their faces. It makes them mean spirited, condescending, and judgmental. Those are self inflicted wounds. I like to egg them on just to keep them fueling their hatred. Nothing is too good for our math snobs.


Now I have just begun using these methods in Craps. You have one data set from two sets of a single grouping. You can bet for it to pass or not pass. You can load up on placed bets while at the same time riding the waves of the Field bets. Your only adversaries or allies being the seven on the come out roll and the following stretch before a seven appears again. It's a soft form of only tracking the Reds/ Blacks in Roulette.


So here is a chart of spins using a blind bet of red only bets. It breaks even while still hitting the greens five times. Everything you can see in this chart that is useful will fit on lined index cards. These cards can be used to play or practice using real live spins.



"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron


-----------------------------------------
W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  01  --  11 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  02  --  13 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  03  --  14 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  04  --  28 ( $ -36 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  05  --  15 ( $ -54 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  06  --  33 ( $ -72 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  07  --  34 ( $ -54 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  08  --  12 ( $ -36 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  09  --  08 ( $ -54 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  10  --  02 ( $ -72 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  11  --  18 ( $ -54 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  12  --  11 ( $ -72 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  13  --  15 ( $ -90 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  14  --  36 ( $ -72 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  15  --  25 ( $ -54 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  16  --  30 ( $ -36 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  17  --  06 ( $ -54 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  18  --  21 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  19  --  03 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  20  --  10 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  21  --  18 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  22  --  30 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  23  --  36 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X | X |  --  24  --  23 ( $ 36 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  25  --  22 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  26  --  12 ( $ 36 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  27  --  33 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  28  --  26 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  29  --  02 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  30  --  33 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  31  --  27 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  32  --  09 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  33  --  10 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  34  --  27 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  35  --  03 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  36  --  16 ( $ 36 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  37  --  28 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  38  --  14 ( $ 36 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  39  --  02 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  40  --  35 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  41  --  06 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  42  --  05 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  43  --  07 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  44  --  02 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  45  --  25 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  46  --  20 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  47  --  30 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  48  --  15 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  49  --  17 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  50  --  29 ( $ -36 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  51  --  17 ( $ -54 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  52  --  10 ( $ -72 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  53  --  34 ( $ -54 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  54  --  21 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  55  --  30 ( $ -18 ) Red
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  56  --  37 ( $ -36 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  57  --  13 ( $ -54 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  58  --  12 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  59  --  18 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  60  --  18 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  61  --  29 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   | X |  --  62  --  30 ( $ 0 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  63  --  13 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  64  --  22 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  65  --  01 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  66  --  08 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  67  --  19 ( $ -18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  68  --  24 ( $ -36 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  69  --  36 ( $ -18 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  70  --  07 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  71  --  16 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  72  --  21 ( $ 36 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  73  --  03 ( $ 54 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  74  --  01 ( $ 72 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  75  --  04 ( $ 54 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  76  --  29 ( $ 36 ) Red
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  77  --  37 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  78  --  32 ( $ 36 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  79  --  03 ( $ 54 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  80  --  14 ( $ 72 ) Red
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  81  --  37 ( $ 54 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  82  --  12 ( $ 72 ) Red
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  83  --  36 ( $ 90 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   | X |  --  84  --  08 ( $ 72 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  85  --  12 ( $ 90 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  86  --  05 ( $ 108 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  87  --  28 ( $ 90 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  88  --  28 ( $ 72 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  89  --  02 ( $ 54 ) Red
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  90  --  37 ( $ 36 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  91  --  12 ( $ 54 ) Red
   | X    | X    | X    |    X |   | X |  --  92  --  15 ( $ 36 ) Red
   | X    | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  93  --  35 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  94  --  28 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  95  --  21 ( $ 18 ) Red
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  96  --  20 ( $ 0 ) Red
X |    X | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  97  --  07 ( $ 18 ) Red
X |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  98  --  16 ( $ 36 ) Red
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  99  --  04 ( $ 18 ) Red
   |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  100  --  37 ( $ 0 ) Red
"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron

So let's take a look at one characteristic in the red/black grouping. That's the first group from the left.


First black dominates over red.


Then red takes over.


There are micro phases that switch back and forth all the way down the 100 spins. They are small mini domination stretches. You can see them and the quality of them.


I notice a lot of times that when one side dominates the other side of the group hits as a single or as a swarm of doubles. Those are signals to try to duplicate the rhythm of the sequence.  If there is a swarm of singles on the resistant side then you can go right back to hammering the dominate side. Now this is very common. With so many data streams, 6 groups in all with this chart, you can just hunt domination where singles or doubles are either prevalent or interspersed equally. The total absence of triples on the weak side is a major opportunity.  You have varying lengths of dominance on the strong side. If you are just seeing singles on the weak side then you can go right back to a win on the next bet. It's a matter of seeing the pattern and betting it to win.


The trick is to have a policy to stop once the pattern breaks. You must stop placing bets once the first triple shows up. You then look to see if the sets flop sides in the grouping. You look for another condition that is repeating. You have 6 groups, 12 sets, to find at least four or five common trends and patterns from at any time. You know "chop." Those are swarms of singles. Sometimes a trait will return right away and continue. You need to watch for that too. You must become a skillful viewer. The more characteristics and common patterns you know the more opportunities you will see occurring. You use virtual bets when you are not placing real bets. You must keep a record of your effectiveness had you flat bet every spin. You only strike when a trend works.


If you only had betting on four in a row tactics, "Quads," then hitting triples each time you place a bet would produce a sequence of losses. You will hit sequences of first bets always losing. It's part of the mathematics of randomness. It's that perfect sequence of death acting up again. It tells you the effectiveness of your session. But you will also hit streaks of winners too. When betting on even chance bets you balance one lost bet with one winning bet. So it's real easy to see effectiveness in bet selections. If you are at least hitting 50/50 on your first bet losses then your winners that contain more wins than losses puts you ahead like the video suggests. You aggregate a 1 win or more for every lost bet. That is what you are looking to accomplish. You know that you will lose 50% of all first bets. But you also know that you will hit the dominant side of the groups for far more. So the challenge here is to learn to see the characteristics of randomness. The skill is to stop feeding a swarm of first bet losses. The chaos and the streaks of dominance and patterns will return if you wait for it to surface.


You can't expect to see your pet numbers go hyperactive just because you have arrived at the casino. You must see what the spins are serving up for today's meal. If you have a plan then you can exploit it. If you don't, then you can't. This would be true of a noticed bias wheel too. Only the casinos change out the parts in order to discourage that.


Do you see this yet? Can you see the method to get more wins than losses from each first try bet? Each first try of a trend or a pattern is like a single stock purchase in the video. In the stocks you hang on for sell points. In this method you go with the pattern until it breaks. You lose a first bet that is a sell loss like in the video. You get more than one win before a loss and that is like a sell at up momentum on the range expected. You are just playing the unknown randomness with speculation that a strong pattern will continue to dominate. It doesn't actually need to be perfect also. It can be slightly imperfect and still have a very strong side to it.
"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron

Time for more BS, and I don't mean bet selection. That's for those that have no idea that I'm back here explaining it all. funny, it's crickets here and I'm not telling anyone that it's here.


Moving on.


I just ran 100 more spins to see what I will see. And it's a huge lesson in reading the effectiveness state. Gotta come up with a better title for that. How about an acronym from " your behind is grass," or some other 50's catch phrase. Somebody coin a phrase. Jokes are permitted from the cricket squads. We all want to laugh.


So this is amazing. It's up and down. And it shows what I want to say if a person where to use good logic to deal with it.


First the graph and then the chart, like before.



"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron

OK, the chart to back it up:


-----------------------------------------
W | B  R | O  E | L  H | 0  6 | P | S |  --  SN  --  SP
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  01  --  01 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  02  --  22 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  03  --  02 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  04  --  31 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  05  --  23 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  06  --  32 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  07  --  32 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  08  --  38 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  09  --  26 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  10  --  16 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  11  --  33 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  12  --  01 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  13  --  31 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  14  --  38 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  15  --  06 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  16  --  19 ( $ -36 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  17  --  23 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  18  --  10 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    | X |   |  --  19  --  02 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  20  --  34 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  21  --  07 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  22  --  17 ( $ -36 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  23  --  23 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  24  --  31 ( $ -36 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  25  --  26 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  26  --  24 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
X | X    | X    | X    | X    |   | X |  --  27  --  13 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  28  --  34 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  29  --  27 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  30  --  25 ( $ 36 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  31  --  26 ( $ 54 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  32  --  26 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  33  --  18 ( $ 54 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  34  --  10 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  35  --  11 ( $ 54 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  36  --  28 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    |   | X |  --  37  --  25 ( $ 90 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  38  --  24 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  39  --  20 ( $ 90 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  40  --  38 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
X | X    | X    |    X | X    |   |   |  --  41  --  29 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  42  --  09 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  43  --  16 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  44  --  38 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  45  --  03 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  46  --  01 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  47  --  34 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  48  --  08 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  49  --  10 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X |    X | X    | X |   |  --  50  --  28 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  51  --  09 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  52  --  10 ( $ 180 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  53  --  11 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  54  --  14 ( $ 180 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X |    X |    X |   | X |  --  55  --  20 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  56  --  17 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  57  --  36 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  58  --  37 ( $ 180 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  59  --  38 ( $ 198 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  60  --  21 ( $ 180 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  61  --  18 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  62  --  38 ( $ 180 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  63  --  16 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  64  --  33 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
X |    X |    X |    X | X    |   |   |  --  65  --  36 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  66  --  08 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  67  --  27 ( $ 162 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  68  --  32 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X | X | X |  --  69  --  31 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    |    X | X    | X |   |  --  70  --  27 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  71  --  11 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  72  --  33 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
X | X    |    X | X    | X    |   | X |  --  73  --  10 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  74  --  17 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X | X | X |  --  75  --  32 ( $ 90 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X |   |  --  76  --  17 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  77  --  08 ( $ 54 ) Zeros
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  78  --  14 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  79  --  06 ( $ 54 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  80  --  38 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    | X    | X    |   |   |  --  81  --  09 ( $ 90 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  82  --  37 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  83  --  38 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
X |    X | X    | X    | X    | X |   |  --  84  --  01 ( $ 144 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  85  --  19 ( $ 126 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X |    X |    X |   |   |  --  86  --  34 ( $ 108 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  87  --  19 ( $ 90 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  88  --  07 ( $ 72 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  89  --  33 ( $ 54 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X | X |   |  --  90  --  06 ( $ 36 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  91  --  08 ( $ 18 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    | X    |    X |   |   |  --  92  --  07 ( $ 0 ) Zeros
   | X    | X    | X    |    X | X | X |  --  93  --  11 ( $ -18 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   |   |  --  94  --  19 ( $ -36 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  95  --  21 ( $ -54 ) Zeros
   |    X |    X | X    |    X | X | X |  --  96  --  12 ( $ -72 ) Zeros
   |    X | X    |    X |    X |   | X |  --  97  --  21 ( $ -90 ) Zeros
   | X    |    X | X    |    X |   |   |  --  98  --  08 ( $ -108 ) Zeros
X |--------------------| X    | X | X |  --  99  --  38 ( $ -90 ) Zeros
X |    X |    X | X    | X    |   |   |  --  100  --  14 ( $ -72 ) Zeros
"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

Gizmotron

Want to blow away a casino? It's all here. All you need is virtual bets and knowing when to step back and when to attack.


You want to learn that? You should if you want to keep up.


You might want to fight for blind absolutism if you don't. I hope you do. We need to see the death throws of the loyal opposition. This is the moment that I always hoped would make the mathBoyz cringe.  They will be destroyed by me. And so far nobody knows I'm doing this. This place is like crickets central. Funny.  Let's keep it a secret.
"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES." 

esoito

"funny, it's crickets here and I'm not telling anyone that it's here."
and
"This place is like crickets central. "

You seem to have broken up your interesting narrative with some sort of insider-crickets-joke that flew right over my head -- and possibly the other reader as well.

Care to explain -- briefly?



XXVV

Sincere thanks for your work and timing Gizmo.

I am very fortunate to be tuned in here at this time and place, and to access your insights, terminology, parallels and cross over strategies from the market traders.

The ridiculous and absurd exclusion of roulette from RQ or risk intelligence analysis will be shown to be flawed, and that to our considerable advantage under the radar.

Perfect timing.  Much exciting work and application ahead.

Thank you. R.

Gizmotron

Quote from: esoito on October 23, 2018, 04:15:17 AM
"funny, it's crickets here and I'm not telling anyone that it's here."
and
"This place is like crickets central. "

You seem to have broken up your interesting narrative with some sort of insider-crickets-joke that flew right over my head -- and possibly the other reader as well.

Care to explain -- briefly?


"Crickets" is a "campy" reference to when in the silence all you can hear are the crickets. It's like saying "really out there" too. It's a common reference in American Movies and  some political talking-heads that just discovered the metaphor.  Funny that too. It's as old as the hills among teenagers. Some talking heads are total nerds. It's a way of seeing if you can get it too. It's a right of passage in slang. I'm sure there must be many other ways to say it among the teenagers of the world. I'd love to hear about that. Teenagers always find a way to be cool.
"...IT'S AGAINST THE LAW TO BREAK THE LAW OF AVERAGES."