Thanks XXVV. You are an analytical researcher. You will probably find a way of your own to modify what I suggest and make it yours. And that is good too.

Hello Gizmotron,

I am happy for you. But, I have some news for you. You are way behind on the discovery ladder. There is a group that has been exploiting this concept for years, sophisticated and fine tuned. Anyway, good for you.

The Crow

Regarding the Crickets if I may.

In my opinion they are all out there, they read,  they watch,  they don't say anything, they look, they Wonder, they go do their thing, it fails,  they come back, they still see the Crickets but they don't see anything else.

The mathBoyz have the furthest to go. They are stuck on prediction and nothing else. I get it. They predict what a bias wheel will produce, a spin computer will calculate, or a dealer signature will occur. Without tangible advantages beyond probability they can't consider being mistaken. So, we carry on. As for the inexperienced players they are mostly stuck on systems. It's a right of passage to find out that the Martingale won't work. Then they spend years tweaking that.

Quote from: The Crow on October 23, 2018, 07:45:03 AM
Hello Gizmotron,

I am happy for you. But, I have some news for you. You are way behind on the discovery ladder. There is a group that has been exploiting this concept for years, sophisticated and fine tuned. Anyway, good for you.

The Crow

I see by an early post that you are illuding to something in an early post:

Quote from: The Crow on March 08, 2013, 10:48:25 AM
There is another approach which does not entail linear thinking, which drives the math guys crazy, synchronistic events.

"Synchronicity refers to those random yet seemingly meaningful coincidences that enrich our lives, sometimes to our amazement, sometimes to our distress, and sometimes to our delight," a foreword by Alan Combs to Dr. Kirby Surprise's book called Synchronicity.

There are many roulette players who experience these events as they are deciding what numbers to choose. It's almost like they know what numbers are coming in. I'm sure at one point or another many have experienced such an event. You say to yourself, number seven is coming in and the dealer says no more bets. The number seven come in.

I believe lateral thinking combined with synchronistic events offers the roulette player an advantage over randomness.

TC

Crow, this is one that is more than five years old:

Quote
Hi Gizmotron,

I am curious how you would choose bet selection while at a live table without all of your sorting tools and filtering. You need some kind of reference. If not by grid, then how?

I use random against random, stream of consciousness if you will. Do you do the same? or are you changing your groups as you play?

TC

I change my groupings constantly based on the best looking continuation. My ESP is fragmentary and only works in short bursts. I have learned to "fly the plane" on instruments. It's a mistake to feed a losing hunch, for me that is.

Crow:

Quote
Roulette is the same thing. The numbers paint a wonderful picture. It's never the same. Random bets are never the same as well. When the two are combined, something magically happens, you win.

I know everything about roulette. More importantly, I know nothing about roulette, which makes me either delusional or real.
Now that's random.

So you make random bet selections. Do you consider that sometimes those bets work badly or do you always bet randomly with a winning accuracy? Do you see where the combinations intersect before you place bets?

Back to the latest chart:


Look at the "| 0 6 |" column from spin 60 and down. The 0's hit as singles for a while and then the repeats start to swarm. All that is needed is a strategy to get way more wins than losses. All you have to do is bet that conditions will continue and to protect when sides change.

Giz,

I don't understand your reasoning for posting old post of mine and requesting responses from them. With regard to your topic, your examples do not show how to capitalize on the trends provided, nor does it show what 0 6, P, S represents. You may have explained it in other posts, but it would appreciated if you post them here for other people who are not familiar with your groupings.

Quote from: The Crow on October 23, 2018, 05:14:55 PM
Giz,

I don't understand your reasoning for posting old post of mine and requesting responses from them. With regard to your topic, your examples do not show how to capitalize on the trends provided, nor does it show what 0 6, P, S represents. You may have explained it in other posts, but it would appreciated if you post them here for other people who are not familiar with your groupings.

I was just trying to confirm that you claim to know what I have just arrived at, something you have been doing for years. I've been banging away at the trends and patterns for more than a decade. I have just been doing it badly.


Before you can capitalize on trends and patterns you must learn to see them. I use the charts, live, while at a casino in order to see the best occurring continuation of any trend or pattern. It is the cart before the horse at this point to explain how to strategically use them. But I did that all in my first example anyway. You are going to get a little observation in the charts and you are going to get suggested strategy for the examples as I continue forward.


I'm puzzled now. You suggest that you already know this stuff. So your question is a rhetorical one for the benefit of other readers or are you in some kind of confusion as to what I'm showing?


Those sets " 0 6 " are sets of 18 or 20 numbers made from the American wheel and are based on locations on the wheel with regards to proximity. There are four sectors. It is meaningless. You can make up any sets that you want. The "P's" and "S's" are pet groups as well with two sets making each grouping also. I don't need to share them. People can make up their own. Use Kimo Li groups that are 18 to 20 numbers if you want.


The point is to place even chance bets that you can then place "X's" in a chart while playing live at a casino. From those charts you can read randomness.


Once you are skilled at all the best characteristics you can learn about the strategy that best mimics what the stock trader suggests in the video. A person must walk before they can run. If you only have one characteristic and one grouping with two sets then your options are very limited. That's sort of all you get with Craps and Baccarat.


Here are the best characteristics to look for.


Repeaters, including any patterns associated with the size of reoccurring stretches.


Chop -- better known on gambling forums as singles in series.


Swarms of doubles, triples, quadruples, etc...


Singles or Doubles in series on one side during an other side's domination.


The allusive global effect and the perfect reoccurring pattern.


This is the first time that I have shown exactly what to look for and at what spin numbers & grouping to find the examples in the charts. It will take a while. You suggest that you already have the skill. I'm actually concerned that you have the power of sight and don't rely on the skill. But this is a question too so I'm willing to answer you.

While there are thousands of characteristics to choose from, there is only one that matters. Having the skills and knowledge of recognizing occurrences comes with experience. What good are these skills when it is not properly applied to playing roulette? I can teach a layman, who has never played roulette, one skill; and they will win every single time.

Recently, I taught two individuals that one skill. One person was not concerned with how much he made, but the consistency the strategy provided, as he played .25 cents betting, buy in 8.00 to 20.00. He won 5 sessions in a row, 100.00 in two hours. That was not his main concern. He was super happy about the consistency.

The other player is currently playing everyday for one hour and makes 100.00 to 170.00 each session. He plays only one session per visit. He started a week ago.

These two players now belong to the exclusive group and talk among themselves. So you see, all this talk about randomness, strategies, patterns, is just that, talk, people searching for answers. You have found a glimpse of recognition. All you have to do is know how to apply it skillfully.

The Crow

Quote from: The Crow on October 23, 2018, 09:38:13 PM
While there are thousands of characteristics to choose from, there is only one that matters. Having the skills and knowledge of recognizing occurrences comes with experience. What good are these skills when it is not properly applied to playing roulette? I can teach a layman, who has never played roulette, one skill; and they will win every single time.

Recently, I taught two individuals that one skill. One person was not concerned with how much he made, but the consistency the strategy provided, as he played .25 cents betting, buy in 8.00 to 20.00. He won 5 sessions in a row, 100.00 in two hours. That was not his main concern. He was super happy about the consistency.

The other player is currently playing everyday for one hour and makes 100.00 to 170.00 each session. He plays only one session per visit. He started a week ago.

These two players now belong to the exclusive group and talk among themselves. So you see, all this talk about randomness, strategies, patterns, is just that, talk, people searching for answers. You have found a glimpse of recognition. All you have to do is know how to apply it skillfully.

The Crow

What a condescending pile of Zen master BS. You are still clueless to what I have to say yet you suggest that you already know where I'm headed. And this crud about an exclusive group of neophytes that have shared in the crumbs that have fallen from your table is almost just short of comical.


We will carry on here with my sharing the real and you doing a Bozo act. All you have done is to pose as a professional gambler that teaches newbies your so called secret "always win" tactics. I'm not buying it anymore. Start your own thread. Seeing what is currently occurring and matching the sequences so as to reveal the effectiveness is as old as the hills. I told everyone back in the Gambler's Glen days. The time of hidden secrets is over. The mathBoyz are about to get a lesson they will never forget. Welcome to the side in the light of day.

Settle down Gz.  Right at this point you have an important decision to make.

EITHER:  choose to be wound up and annoyed by what others write and respond in a way that going to lead to a protracted, dysfunctional argument

OR:  choose NOT to be wound up and annoyed by what others write. Just ignore it and simply continue the thread.

Your choice.  (I sincerely hope you choose the second option...)

I already have gone with the second option. I can remove any more disruptions. I thought he had something to say. He can pose his positions in his own area.

Sorry Giz, you are the one who posted all of my old posts to get a reaction from me. It's not what you wanted to hear.

I simply told you the truth, just stating the facts. I can back up all of my claims, 100%.

In fact, I can contact Victor and provide proof so he can acknowledge to you that I do have what I say.

The Crow