mBB, as you might have read in another thread somewhere, you must find a way to make it your own. I like looking at the conditions and using a built in regression style after each attacking win, if the conditions allow for it. Your vision of attacking the triples would have also been profitable.

As far as knowing when to jump in goes. I look back from eight, to sixteen, to thirty spins back. I use a charting method that allows me to see the effect of any patterns forming or existing in rapid order. It's possible to pick up on characteristics with a quick glance.

Most of the time my way of doing this is to play the existing short term trends while also letting any global effect also influence my guesses.  I've learned that it's great to catch a long term GE early. There is no rule. Experience tells me to give it a try. Please take note of this: I always look at each session from the point of its difficulty. That lets me know if things are changing or if they are continuing to be difficult.  It's all covered in my checklist of things to scan for on each spin.

So now I can simplify all this. While typical randomness characteristics are occurring, they also sometimes simultaneously exist in a bigger, over all, characteristic that runs through everything. You would be wise to become aware of patterns and other characteristics, so that you become accustomed to seeing the trend, having never seen them before.

Now is that difficult to understand by any of you? I'd be very happy to answer any questions.

If you can find a way to make that your own then you can find out for all of us. I never leave a positive opportunity in the middle of it. The reason that I discovered a global effect occurring on four different tables is because I was betting against the opportunities. I learned about trends the hard way. But that was way back in the beginning. I hope to help many of you from making huge mistakes.

I do my best when I'm in simple to process sessions. Nice easy trends to read. Perfect effectiveness that rewards you with patterns and trends that run long and cooperate. If it were easy like that all the time the casinos would have shut down centuries ago.

Although it doesn't matter, Spike is accusing me of abandoning this thread. The concept is here. What I shared about it makes sense to me. Do I need to repeat myself or to give more examples? I just want people to know that small trend characteristics sometimes combine together to show a kind of larger continuing characteristic. That larger characteristic can be significant enough to be highly profitable. Ignoring their existence is certainly a waste of an opportunity.

Great stuff Gizmotron!


You have to feel this approach, I think I do.

I'm not sure what you might mean about feeling it. I can't see the effect without the use of my charts. Then, it's just a matter of seeing them. It's true that going for it, high betting trends, it takes guts. Perhaps there is an element of gut instinct involved. There is nothing that can tell you what the next spin will do. You can't win a huge win streak if you never take the first step.

You have to feel the consistency of this bet selection during "random".

rrrr BBB rr BBBB rBrrr BB rrr BBBBB rBrBrB rrrr BBB rr BB rrrr BBB rrrrrrr ...

This is how it looks like in my matrix of 6 steps, horizontal and vertical reading:

1 2 3 4 5 6


4 3 2 4 1 1
3 2 3 5 1 1
1 1 1 1 4 3
2 2 4 3 7

Where 1, 3, 5 are reds and 2 4 6 blacks.
You'll see interesting patterns while looking at vertical reading also.

I've been on this for a long time. Gizmotron is right. One can take profit of these events if you understand how series, intermitences are flowing. It's all about sincronizing with randomness. Clusters of series, series isolated in a row, how many intermitences between series. Those are things one must observe.
Practice and a training eye do the rest.

There are great opportunites there.

From this disposition of the series I assume it is just an example from Gizmotron. They were not taken from a real session. Usually they are not so caotic. I mean so many ups and downs of series components.

Quote from: Gizmotron on February 26, 2013, 05:27:33 AM
I'm accustomed to looking how the singles are flowing. There is one pure thing going on. When it changes from red or from black, there is at least one repeat from the new color. When it changes to a stretch of singles it comes back to the same characteristic. Once again it starts with at least one repeat before shifting.

I would bet big for every next bet after a change. Then I would bet at 25% of each big bet until it loses. The loss being a shift to the next color. After two losses in a row I would see that the perfect condition had changed. So that ends exploiting it. BUT -- it comes back to doing it again. That's one of the characteristics of the global effect. The strange configurations become a kind of type that returns for 30 minutes to several hours. Before me , I doubt that there were any players that tried to exploit these kind of big picture characteristics and conditions.

Once you start seeing these conditions you will never be able to go back to not seeing them ever again. They are great opportunities waiting to be exploited.
I'm so sure ths discussion will be fruitful that

And what happens when it chops s for 20 in a row?

I have studied singles and series from a probability point of view and they follow the same unpredictable varience that ec follows. Infact...they are the same.
As pointed out....20 chop is perfectly acceptable in a small sample but single hits will be close to series hits with much larger samples.
I don't see any reason for patterns forming mathematically....just in the mind.
No intentional putdown on the topic owner....just IMO

Quote from: Dr. Mabuse on June 13, 2014, 02:18:16 PM
It is NOT what one sees but what one THINKS one sees.

Couldnt agree more. I am not me, I am not who I think I am, I am not who you think I am, I am what I think who you think I am. Crazy world of roulette, couldnt get any crazier than this.

There is some rationale in this though. Thinking loud, Gizmo, if you are winning, it is not the selection that is making you win, it is your approach to game and the way you spend your money is what is making you win. That is my humble opinion. And as always I don't expect you to believe me or agree with me. You will get that trot you are talking about even by just following the last even chance.

Quote from: warrior on June 13, 2014, 01:07:24 PM

And what happens when it chops s for 20 in a row?

I don't attempt to specialize in choppy stretches. I just try to find characteristics that are continuing. I realize that for the moment that chop is currently continuing. I just don't have a good betting method for it. I know chop will end. Everything has an ending. Everything has a beginning, a middle, and an end.

Quote from: Turner on June 13, 2014, 02:43:02 PM
I have studied singles and series from a probability point of view and they follow the same unpredictable varience that ec follows. Infact...they are the same.
As pointed out....20 chop is perfectly acceptable in a small sample but single hits will be close to series hits with much larger samples.
I don't see any reason for patterns forming mathematically....just in the mind.
No intentional putdown on the topic owner....just IMO

The point of the global effect is to see if it conforms to an existing context that relates to the most resent set of spins. When it happens, it adds to the possibility of having a strong win streak. Once you start to recognize the phenomenon, you will never be able to go back to not seeing them.

Carpanta, interesting use of the matrix as a charting method. It proves that charts can reveal characteristics.