QuoteLet me point this out.
YOU DO NOT NEED TO HAVE REFERRALS..
As for the Matrix.
The upgrade just puts you into the matrix.
It really is there for the food run for the kids.
You can make money in WWS with out SPONSORING a single soul.
All you have to do. Is purchase Life Jackets.
Make 5% gratitude tokens a week.
5% on your money.
Is better than any bank out there.
WWSz is a REAL business.
With Real products.
Up to you if you wish to do it or not.

You can read about it in the MMG forum.
http://www.moneymakergroup.com/Worldwidesolutionz-Worl-t437266.html&st=3120 -Thomas Grant's gypsy scam

Thomas Grant,

I recently helped bail out a Nigerian prince.  I'm expecting his wire transfer for several million to come in any day now.  So, I'll be buying those life jackets real soon!   



-Xander

QuoteIts reminds me of those hey days of prohibition.
Make something illegal.
And whatever it is.
Finds its way underground.
Onto the black market.
Fortunately most European countries are far more intelligent that what the US is.
They just tax the frak out of Alcohol and other drugs.-Thomas Grant

Thomas Grant,

Here's a little history for you on prohibition:

Czech Republic[edit]

On 14 September 2012, the government of the Czech Republic banned all sales of liquor with more than 20% alcohol. From this date on it was illegal to sell (and/or offer for sale) such alcoholic beverages in shops, supermarkets, bars, restaurants, gas stations, e-shops etc. This measure was taken in response to the wave of methanol poisoning cases resulting in the deaths of 18 people in the Czech Republic.[10] Since the beginning of the "methanol affair" the total number of deaths has increased to 25. The ban was to be valid until further notice,[11] though restrictions were eased towards the end of September.[12] The last bans on Czech alcohol with regard to the poisoning cases were lifted on 10 October 2012, when neighbouring Slovakia and Poland allowed its import once again.[13]

Nordic countries[edit]

The Nordic countries, with the exception of Denmark, have had a strong temperance movement since the late 1800s, closely linked to the Christian revival movement of the late 19th century, but also to several worker organisations. As an example, in 1910 the temperance organisations in Sweden had some 330,000 members,[14] which was 6% of a population of 5.5 million.[15] Naturally, this heavily influenced the decisions of Nordic politicians in the early 20th century.

Already in 1907, the Faroe Islands passed a law prohibiting all sale of alcohol, which was in force until 1992. However, very restricted private importation from Denmark was allowed from 1928.

In 1914, Sweden put in place a rationing system, the Bratt System, in force until 1955. However a referendum in 1922 rejected an attempt to enforce total prohibition.

In 1915, Iceland instituted total prohibition. The ban for wine and spirits was lifted in 1935, but beer remained prohibited until 1989.

In 1916, Norway prohibited distilled beverages, and in 1917 the prohibition was extended to also include fortified wine and beer. The wine and beer ban was lifted in 1923, and in 1927 the ban of distilled beverages was also lifted.

In 1919, Finland enacted prohibition, as one of the first acts after independence from the Russian Empire. Four previous attempts to institute prohibition in the early 20th century had failed due to opposition from the tsar. After a development similar to the one in the United States during its prohibition, with large-scale smuggling and increasing violence and crime rates, public opinion turned against the prohibition, and after a national referendum where 70% voted for a repeal of the law, prohibition was ended in early 1932.[16][17]

Today, all Nordic countries (with the exception of Denmark) continue to have strict controls on the sale of alcohol which is highly taxed (dutied) to the public. There are government monopolies in place for selling spirits, wine and stronger beers in Norway (Vinmonopolet), Sweden (Systembolaget), Iceland (Vínbúðin), the Faroe Islands (Rúsdrekkasøla landsins) and Finland (Alko). Bars and restaurants may, however, import alcoholic beverages directly or through other companies.

See also: Alcoholic beverages in Sweden and Algoth Niska

Greenland, which is part of the kingdom of Denmark does not share its easier controls on the sale of alcohol.[18]

Soviet Union[edit]

Main article: Prohibition in Russian Empire and Soviet Union

In the Russian Empire, a limited version of a Dry Law was introduced in 1914.[19] It continued through the turmoil of the Russian Revolution of 1917 and the Russian Civil War into the period of Soviet Russia and the Soviet Union until 1925.

United Kingdom[edit]

Although the sale or consumption of commercial alcohol has never been prohibited by law, historically various groups in the UK have campaigned for the prohibition of alcohol, including the Society of Friends (Quakers), The Methodist Church and other non-conformist Christians, as well as temperance movements such as Band of Hope and temperance Chartist movements of the 19th century.

In 1853, inspired by the Maine law in the USA, the United Kingdom Alliance led by John Bartholomew Gough was formed aimed at promoting a similar law prohibiting the sale of alcohol in the UK. This hard-line group of prohibitionists was opposed by other temperance organisations who preferred moral persuasion to a legal ban. This division in the ranks limited the effectiveness of the temperance movement as a whole. The impotence of legislation in this field was demonstrated when the Sale of Beer Act 1854 which restricted Sunday opening hours had to be repealed, following widespread rioting. In 1859 a prototype prohibition bill was overwhelmingly defeated in the House of Commons.[20]


-------------------

In the US, we've been slow on the online gambling because there's so much corruption abroad within the online gambling community.  Dr. Elliot Jacobson, and others have documented several incidents. 

"Crooks in the Online Casino Industry"

Posted on January 2, 2014 | 8 Comments -Written by Dr. Elliot Jacobson.


"In January, 2012, I was hired by an online casino to audit the online casino software company that provided their software. This casino wanted to get a Certified Fair Gambling seal. I began the audit in late March, 2012. The software company had previously obtained a TST certification for their RNG, which was sent to me together with other documentation, log files and code slices. TST wrote, in part:

"TST has verified, through mathematical and statistical analysis, within a 95.0% confidence interval, that the RNG outcomes exhibit sufficient non-predictability, fair distribution and lack of bias to particular outcomes.

TST's evaluation was limited to outcome-based testing in the laboratory environment, and was performed using a test version of the RNG. TST's evaluation was based on specific information and materials to be outlined within the forthcoming Final Report (including, but not necessarily limited to, source code, software, hardware, configurations, documentation and general correspondence), as submitted to TST throughout the duration of the evaluation."

What does TST certification really mean?

As I audited the log files from the casino, everything came back normal for Keno and Blackjack. I noted that this company's shuffle was non-standard and needed some repair. I also indicated to them that their data format was substandard. When it came to auditing craps, that's when things started to go wrong. The following are my notes as I audited craps:

Craps (log files received 03/24/2012)
◾RTP = 97.62%. Not clear if I computed it correctly.
◾Audit dice #1 (5 DOF, p-Value 0.10373)
◾Audit dice #2 (5 DOF, p-Value 0.32725)
◾Audit dice total (11 DOF, p-Value 0.33259)
◾Dice total correlation tests (11 DOF, p-Values inconsistent).  7 values under 0.05.
◾Dice total correlation tests other direction (11 DOF, p-Values also inconsistent) 6 values under 0.05.
◾Dice correlation for single dice (dice 1 test) for dice value 4 gives (5 DOF, p-value = 0.000035993). That's 35-in-100000. Other values are ok. (5 DOF, p-Values are inconsistent).
◾Dice correlation for single dice (dice 2 test) for dice value 2 gives (5 DOF, p-value = 0.0056).
◾REQUESTED – code that shows how dice values are being generated.

As you see, I was not happy with the results from the correlation tests. One type of correlation test considers the value of one dice if the value of the other dice is fixed. Another form of correlation test considers consecutive rolls. I wanted more details.

I contacted the software company and was sent a code slice that showed how the RNG was used to produce dice rolls. It was clear that the code was incomplete. As I was making additional requests, I received an e-mail from the lead programmer for the company asking if I had a few minutes to talk by phone. What happened next was truly remarkable. I spoke with the coder who confessed everything to me. Here are the notes I took during that call:

CFG_Audit_Rogue_01

Hopefully you get the general idea. The next day, I spoke with the owner of the software company on the phone. Here are my notes from this call:

CFG_Audit_Rogue_03

Later, I got this email, denying the confession:

CFG_Audit_Rogue_02

The owner had culled data from customers who played the version when it was not in "rogue-mode" and wanted me to look at that data and give craps a "pass." The owner wanted me to ignore the phone call from the software developer. The owner apologized for the bad data that had accidentally been sent to me. The owner expected me to go back, look at new clean logs, and continue as if nothing bad had happened.

I spoke with the programmer and owner several more times by phone. The programmer told me that he had asked the owner to stop lying to me. The programmer told me that the owner indicated that the lies would continue in order to protect the company in question.

I spoke with the owner of the software company again on April 13, 2012. The owner indicated that the software company still wanted CFG certification. The owner said that they had paid 50% in advance for it and expected to be certified. I told them no. No certification. No money back.

Later, I got a letter from someone involved who wanted the audit to continue in the face of everything that had come to pass:

"In case you're wondering why I am still going after this so hard, I really don't want this cheat and liar to get away with it.  XXX is a horrible human being and doesn't deserve to be rewarded for their dishonesty. "

In the end I concluded that the casino was totally surprised and caught off guard. They did not know the software was rogue or had a cheat mode. In my opinion, the software company accidentally left a cheat option in place on a  piece of craps code that was deployed to the online casino.  The casino wanted the CFG seal and expected to get it. Needless to say, they no longer use this casino software.

It is simply not the case that every casino software company produces software that is capable of cheating. I know many companies with integrity. I know many companies that are not crooked. There are good guys out there. Hopefully this account shows just how tough it can get as a game fairness auditor. Protecting the good guys means dealing with the bad guys.

This software company continues to have its product in dozens of online casinos worldwide. I am not sure how many of those casinos use its "cheat mode" or are even aware such a mode exists. I am not free to disclose the name of this casino or software company; both were clients and are protected by confidentiality.

I stand by the CFG seal and the casinos and software companies it represents. I'm also relieved to be done with the industry as a game fairness auditor.

[added 1.10.2014]

There has been quite a bit of discussion on some gambling message boards about why I am not willing to disclose this software provider. I was hired by a casino to audit their software provider so that the casino could post the CFG seal. This relationship was not a public audit and was never intended to be public.

I was not hired by a government agency to conduct a public audit. I was not hired by some third-party to publicly investigate a suspected rogue software product.  I was hired as a private business by a private business to audit another private business.  CFG is not affiliated with any jurisdiction or regulatory agency and has no public disclosure obligation. This relationship and all findings were and are confidential. The only public information would have been permission to use the CFG seal, if it was awarded.  It wasn't. My recourse under the terms of the contract did not provide for a public remedy.

As far as the number of casinos that run this software, I did a quick Google search and found 14 casinos. I am not sure of the exact number of casinos that currently use this software.

One of the greatest sources of security and safety are the players themselves. Every instance I know of a casino software company having their products exposed as rogue in the last few years has been initiated from a player complaint. Complaints by players may be taken lightly by the gaming community without significant evidence to back up their claims. Players who suspect rogue behavior need to keep careful records and be prepared to take proactive steps to back up their case. It is important that players continue to bring their issues forward through established portals, like Casinomeister, thePogg and Wizardofvegas.

No audit is perfect. No audit can be guaranteed to catch malfeasance. But, a rigorous fairness audit is better than no audit at all. It is important that players only choose eCogra, TST and CFG certified casinos. CFG certification, in particular, focuses purely on game fairness. These certifications may not be perfect, but a casino software product that fails to have any of these should be played with caution."  -Dr. Elliot Jacobson

It continues at http://apheat.net/2014/01/02/crooks-in-the-online-casino-industry/


-------------------------------


In short, some online casinos have some cheating code within various gaming software RNG that's designed to cheat you in order to ensure that the casino shows a profit each month.

If you don't believe me, then please take the time to read and research the link that I've provided above.   

-Xander

Thanks for bringing this to our attention!

Caesar's and Harrah's goons!  This should not surprise anyone considering the casino's debt load and the poor management on the part of the surveillance crews.

But why an RNG?

I believe that you'd have the best chance of winning if you were to play on a live game. 

I wouldn't trust the software being used to run an RNG -and for some very good reasons as documented by Dr. Elliot Jacobson.

Why not play the live games at Fairway casino or any of the William Hill casinos?

-Xander

Gordonline,

You need to post your problems on the Wizardofvegas.com


The Wizard's forum has some weight in the gaming world and is referenced by some in the industry.


-Xander

I don't like it when drunks attempt to blame others for their actions.

However, I hate the predatory action of many casinos even more!  Especially when they thumb their noses at the law.  Gaming law is clear, the casinos aren't supposed to take your action if you're that drunk and impaired!

Relax Ken. 

Let's pick up some of the stones and hold off on throwing new ones.

Quote(Advantage-play is for suckers) Gambler's Fallacy is a term coined by unsuccessful gamblers to validate their reasons for losing. Why would I take advice from a person who has dedicated no more than 9 hours to roulette?
He/she is a quitter in my book and I have no use for quitters!! No person has yet convinced me that their way of playing roulette is better than my way.....STILL WAITING -Mr. J.

Mr. J.,

Do you know the secret AP handshake?

Quote'Xander' - your claim is feeble and spurious. And this is your first line - you can't even get that right.

XXVV,

You're obviously not looking at the correct file.  Please check again.  The data is quite corrupt.  The dupes for the first 3030 spins are shown below. And they matter!  The actual file is once again attached to this post as well.

QuoteOne of my colleagues, a scientist, is refreshing in the objective view he has of many of his colleagues who happily and knowingly 'paper over the cracks' in terms of orthodoxies and refusal to answer difficult questions. It is wise to not be too certain about anything or to trade using others assumptions. These can be false. -XXVV

Why are all of these repeating sequences in this data?  Why didn't your "scientist" that you work with notice the duplicated spins??? 

Now, let's examine my "spurious" claim.


8 Lines 484 to 490  They mysteriously show up again 687 spins later!
28 seven spins that are the same as lines 1171 to 1177 
9 
3 
19 
29 
30 
------------------------

29 Lines 519 to 554 They mysteriously show up 765 spins later!
32 36 spins that are the same as lines 1284 to 1319. 
22 
8 
17 
25 
4 
17 
7 
17 
3 
29 
27 
20 
32 
3 
22 
5 
29 
4 
12 
28 
10 
21 
14 
28 
4 
14 
35 
35 
11 
14 
36 
13 
21 
33
--------------------
36 Lines 623 to 643 They mysteriously show up 453 spins later!
12 21 spins that are the same as lines 1076 to 1096. 
18 
32 
29 
36 
36 
8 
28 
6 
6 
25 
12 
35 
18 
29 
11 
26 
3 
8 
24
------------------

36   Line 1076 to 1096
12   21 spins that are the same as lines 623 to 643  They've already hit 453 spins ago!
18   
32   
29   
36   
36   
8   
28   
6   
6   
25   
12   
35   
18   
29   
11   
26   
3   
8   
24   
---------------

22   Lines 1101 to 1111.  They mysteriously show up 123 spins later!
19   11 spins that are the same as lines 1224 to 1234. 
26   
29   
5   
9   
7   
9   
10   
9   
36
--------
8   Line 1116 to 1156.  They mysteriously show up 122 spins later!
10   41 spins that are the same as Line 1238 to 1278
9   
5   
0   
22   
35   
0   
22   
9   
24   
34   
25   
25   
11   
23   
19   
32   
27   
7   
35   
36   
11   
25   
25   
11   
15   
10   
10   
4   
22   
10   
21   
18   
13   
26   
11   
34   
20   
12   
35
-------

8   Lines 1171 to 1177.  They've already hit 687 spins ago!
28   7 spins that are the same as  lines 484 to 490
9   
3   
19   
29   
30
--------

22   Lines 1224 to 1234.  They've already hit 123 spins ago!
19   11 spins that are the same as lines 1101 to 1111
26   
29   
5   
9   
7   
9   
10   
9   
36   
---------------

8   Lines 1238 to 1278.  They've already hit 122 spins ago!
10   41 spins that are the same as Lines 1116 to 1156
9   
5   
0   
22   
35   
0   
22   
9   
24   
34   
25   
25   
11   
23   
19   
32   
27   
7   
35   
36   
11   
25   
25   
11   
15   
10   
10   
4   
22   
10   
21   
18   
13   
26   
11   
34   
20   
12   
35   
------------

29   Lines 1284 to 1319.  They've already hit 765 spins ago!
32   36 spins that are the same as lines 519 to 554
22   
8   
17   
25   
4   
17   
7   
17   
3   
29   
27   
20   
32   
3   
22   
5   
29   
4   
12   
28   
10   
21   
14   
28   
4   
14   
35   
35   
11   
14   
36   
13   
21   
33
-----------

33   Lines 1792 to 1804.  They mysteriously show up again 131 spins later!
36   13 spins that are the same as lines 1923 to 1935
11   
11   
20   
23   
33   
11   
8   
25   
18   
16   
12

------------

2   Lines 1808 to 1825                                                                                                                                                   
21   23 spins that are the same as lines 2515 to 2537 with other spins added in between.  Weird!             
13   13
9   9
6   6
2   2
18   21
26   13
14   9
21   6
0   2
11   18
3   26
21   14
33   21
25   0
19   11
26   3
-------------

18   Lines 1827 to 1853.  They mysteriously show up again 712 spins later!
15   27 spins that are the same as lines 2539 to 2565
17   19
18   26
29   
35   
15   
23   
3   
7   
34   
25   
35   
11   
22   
4   
16   
14   
17   
5   
22   
3   
24   
6   
19   
11   
19   
-------------

30   Lines 1855 to 1863.  They mysteriously show up again 712 spins later
23   9 spins that are the same as lines 2567 to 2575
2   
27   
7   
29   
1   
5   
16   
-----------

33   Lines 1923 to 1935.  They've already hit 131 spins ago!
36   13 Spins that are the same as lines 1792 to 1804
11   
11   
20   
23   
33   
11   
8   
25   
18   
16   
12   

-----------------

2   Lines 2515 to 2537.  Wait a minute, we've seen these number before!  Someone's trying to fool us?
21   23 spins that are the same as lines 1808 to 1825 with other spins added in between
13   
9   
6   
2   
21   
13   
9   
6   
2   
18   
26   
14   ?? Data that has been inserted in between a repeating string of numbers
21   ??
0   
11   
3   
21   
33   
25   
19   
26   

-------------

18   Lines 2539 to 2565.  We've seen these spins before.  They hit 712 spins ago!
15   27 spins that are the same as lines 1827 to 1853
17   
18   
29   
35   
15   
23   
3   
7   
34   
25   
35   
11   
22   
4   
16   
14   
17   
5   
22   
3   
24   
6   
19   
11   
19
--------

30   Lines 2567 to 2575.  We've seen these spin before.  They hit 712 spins ago!
23   9 spins that are the same as lines 1855 to 1863
2   
27   
7   
29   
1   
5   
16   

--------

Well, what do you think now?  Do you still feel that my claim is spurious?  Unlike your supposed experts and scientists, I really know how to examine the data.  If I chose to, I could run a battery of additional tests on it that would make your brain bleed out your ears.     (For example, there's an unusual tendency for a number to show up roughly halfway across the wheel 17 spins later, which could mean digit flips  This means the person simply is turning a 1 into a 2, a 3 into a 4, a 21 into a 22, a 22 into a 23,... etc....  It looks suspicious) I suspect that some of the data is likely fake.


I'm not blaming you for the bad data.  I just don't appreciate you taking unwarranted jabs at me for pointing out the data was corrupt. 

Rather than throwing anymore rocks, what do you say we pick up some of the stones that have been thrown and start over?  

Sincerely,

-Xander


Note regarding the number flip investigation attachment:  The graphs shown are standard deviation value graphs. 


   




   
   




   
   

   

QuoteThis data is important to note because O'Neil'Dunne had an extraordinary and full life. His business career was at the top levels of management and commerce. A wonderful life.  I get really annoyed when someone hiding behind anonymity like Xander comes up with detail that would attempt to discredit this man's reputation in some way.XXVV

XXVV,

There was no attempt to discredit O'Neil.  Again, I think that you're being a bit melodramatic.  I simply noticed that his data looked skewed.  After having run a few tests, I was able to prove that the data was indeed corrupt.

Now if he's not the one responsible for the corrupt data, then who is?  The publisher?  The person that keyed the data?  You?   For the record, I don't believe that it was you and I've said this repeatedly. 

QuoteThe first specific example that Xander cites of 'very corrupt' inaccuracy of data is itself very corrupt. His example just is not accurate as there is an example of 21 doubling and 29 followed by 10 but the intervening numbers are different. -XXVV

Are you saying that you believe that the data is not corrupt, and that it's just caused by randomness? 

or

  Are you implying that I'm making this all up?

  The duplicated sequences will have a big effect on the system testing.  You should be happy that the duplicated strings have been highlighted, so that they can be removed.

You do want the testing to be more scientific and accurate don't you? 


For the record, I'm replying to the XXVV "Statement Thread" that he's locked.  http://betselection.cc/xxvv-studio/a-statement/   Since he's locked his thread, nobody is able to post.  Some people that have attempted to post there have had their posts deleted.  He likes to post on a public forum and likes to get in his jabs, but will not stand for a dissenting view. People in glass houses should not throw rocks. 


-Xander

By the way, love the unicorn Marshall . Too funny!   

Maybe I should have added another unicorn? 

QuoteXander...so what would good data look like....I mean...do you expect some repeat of data...or is there none...or is there a limit...say 5 numbers may repeat 1% in a certain sample....6 may repeat 0.1% etc...or am I trying to penetrate your inner sanctum
Oooh matron !!!!!-Turner

Using some basic probability, you can calculate the odds of a specific string repeating.  For example, the probability of seeing a specific seven number sequence repeating is the same as seeing a specific number repeating seven times in a row 1/37 ^7

Strings of three numbers in length are more common than you might think.  An occasional string of four numbers in a row is very unusual, but not out of the question.  A string of five numbers repeating is quite unusual, but I've actually seen it twice, possibly three times in my life in the form of a number that his five times in a row.  (Two of the times I witnessed it as it happened.  The third time I only saw three of them hit and the other two hits were already on the board.)  I've seen more four repeating sequences than fives.  And I see a three string sequence regularly.  Keep in mind that I have access to massive quantities of spins.

If there are more than a few sequences of five numbers repeating in sequence - in a large file, then they should be removed.

On the XXVV file I simply removed the sequences of seven spins or longer because it was faster than a full scrub.

QuoteYeah I heard about you AP guys...secret handshakes...decoder rings...the works -Roulette Key.  I just like the "closely guarded secret" thing going on in a public forum regarding a game few people give anyone a chance at winning at.

Yes, there really is a TOP SECRET AP HANDSHAKE.  Here's the link to it.  (But please! Be discrete! Do NOT share!)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g_IJCpZfrPA

I probably should have explained what I meant by a closely guarded secret.  Sorting data in that way and the programming code used wouldn't be of use to anyone on this board.  It wouldn't help anyone here win.  Don't read anything into it.  It's more of a programming thing.  I didn't mean for that to come across in the way that it did.

-Xander

QuoteXXVV Studio / Re: THREAD FIFTEEN - live play 28 Feb 2014 and updated comments
« on: March 01, 2014, 11:27:39 pm »

Regarding Macao,


Recall the tests were done in 1970 and the data published in POND book was methodically analysed by the Author's team and all charts are published in this excellent book -XXVV

QuoteApparently, according to Xander it is unlikely I was aware of the degree of 'corruption' in this spin data.-XXVV

I don't believe that you knew that it was corrupt data.  Finding repeating strings over so many spins is way beyond the expertise of a new player or layman.  I don't see how you could have known. I think it was probably the result of one or some of the following: The person that keyed the data,  because the original authors wanted to increase the number of spins that they had, or because their data collection proceedure was very amateurish.

QuoteHowever, what of the reputation of the Irish born, Canadian/US businessman Mr O'Neil-Dunne, a wartime RAF fighter pilot who flew with distinction night fighter mosquito aircraft equipped with radar, and an outspoken advocate for health warnings to be provided by Rothmans where he was a senior partner.-XXVV

What of it?  Aren't you being a bit dramatic here? Or are you implying that the repeating sequences of numbers are random and that I'm exaggerating all of this?  So he's a great pilot.  Big deal!  But that doesn't mean that he's good at collecting and recording data.  Tracking and organizing data is more difficult than most people realize.  Try tracking a few thousand spins sometime.  Then you'll understand how it can happen.

QuoteWhat of the reputation of Mr Stanley Ho and his management team who daily certified numbers, and Mr Ho frequently accompanied the Author in his sessions.

What of it?  I believe that you may be over estimating the efficiency and accuracy of casino staff.  My experience is that they are about as efficient as your local parks and rec division or water department.  In other words, not that great.

QuoteThe implications of this are fascinating, and true to form, the trouble maker strikes again.

I'm sorry, I guess I should have let everyone falsely believe that the WF3 could produce big wins based on the Macau testing?

Look, the system isn't that bad.  Your WF3 system and the numerous clones of it invented since the inception of the game, really will slightly reduce the house edge on live wheels.  It really is a step in the right direction.  Betting the hot numbers is far better than chasing the cold ones. 

Quote'Give me a Sign' to have nothing further to do with divisive and pointless posting by individuals who have little understanding yet distort interpretation and consider themselves authorities.-XXVV

Sorry XXVV.  But don't you're being just a bit melodramatic?   I'm simply posting the facts.  I'm sorry if the facts are divisive, and If the methods that I've laid out so that you can improve the system seem pointless to you.


-------------

Below is the list of the duplicated sequences of numbers within the first 3030 spins of the corrupt Macau spin file.  The file is also attached:

Please note that there are likely several more repeating sequences that are less than seven spins in length.  I've only highlighted the repeating sequences that are seven spins or longer in length.

Lines 484 to 490
7 spins that are the same as lines 1171 to 1177
Lines 519 to 554
36 spins that are the same as lines 1284 to 1319
Line 623 to 643
21 spins that are the same as lines 1076 to 1096
Line 1076 to 1096
21 spins that are the same as lines 623 to 643
Lines 1101 to 1111
11 spins that are the same as lines 1224 to 1234
Line 1116 to 1156
41 spins that are the same as Line 1238 to 1278
Lines 1171 to 1177
7 spins that are the same as  lines 484 to 490
Lines 1224 to 1234
11 spins that are the same as lines 1101 to 1111
Lines 1238 to 1278
41 spins that are the same as Lines 1116 to 1156
Lines 1284 to 1319
36 spins that are the same as lines 519 to 554
Lines 1792 to 1804
13 spins that are the same as lines 1923 to 1935
Lines 1808 to 1825                                                                                                                                                   2
23 spins that are the same as lines 2515 to 2537 with other spins added in between             21
Lines 1827 to 1853
27 spins that are the same as lines 2539 to 2565
Lines 1855 to 1863
9 spins that are the same as lines 2567 to 2575
Lines 1923 to 1935
13 Spins that are the same as lines 1792 to 1804
Lines 2515 to 2537
23 spins that are the same as lines 1808 to 1825 with other spins added in between
?? Data that has been inserted in between a repeating string of numbers
??


Lines 2539 to 2565
27 spins that are the same as lines 1827 to 1853
Lines 2567 to 2575
9 spins that are the same as lines 1855 to 1863


-Xander

After investigating the Macau data further, I've found why the XXVV system appeared to perform so well on this specific sample.   The sample was the one that produced the largest win for the WF3/WF4 system.

It's because there are several repeating strings of data.  The repeating strings of data are highlighted in different colors.  Only the repeating strings seven spins or longer are highlighted. Attached are only the first 3030 spins.  There are likely several shorter strings of repeating numbers.

In short, the original data was very corrupt.  Please note that I do NOT believe that XXVV is responsible for the bad data, and I doubt that he knew it was bad.  The average player would likely not know how to examine the data in order to find the repeating strings and would not know how to measure it's quality.  Such techniques are closely guarded secrets among APs.

  The responsible party was probably the original source of the data or the person that keyed it.

-Caleb