+ Register

[BetJack]

What about this ?
Is this real work?
I ask myself many times
betselection.cc/albalaha's-exclusive/holy-grail-randomness-can-be-beaten-even-in-the-longest-run/
betselection.cc/albalaha's-exclusive/holy-grail-randomness-can-be-beaten-even-in-the-longest-run/ 

[Blue_Angel]

We need to bet each decision and not trying to be smart here " I would have not played this" or "such harshness isn't possible in my bet" etc.
         These sessions are extracted from a long excel tracker having nearly 23 kinds of EC bets.

The name of this forum is "bet selection", by making those kind of statements you disregard and disrespect the very essence of this forum.

Can a progression wins disregarding completely the betting selection??

That has yet to be seen and verified, in my opinion, a progression supports a selection and the selection the progression.

You cannot have one without the other, simple as that.

[ozon]

Everyone just criticizes, but no one really knows whether the Albalaha system works.
No one here who criticizes,  did not see on his eyes  the strategy.
And all they call it a scam, and no one in fact did not check whether work.

[MarkTeruya]

Everyone just criticizes, but no one really knows whether the Albalaha system works.
No one here who criticizes,  did not see on his eyes  the strategy.
And all they call it a scam, and no one in fact did not check whether work.

They could work, but so do other betting methods, which he deletes. What does that tell you?

[ozon]

The situation is such that, with me as a player who has a lot of time on the game, but does not have a long term winning strategy. It is easier to try and buy such strategies than wasting my time and money on a multi-year experience. I've tried with some reportedly with the success  players ,2 times  pay for strategy, in other cases offered% from winnings.All their strategies have failed.
After hearing assumptions Albalaha strategy, I think it might be a good  system.

It is better to pay for something that can work, than to lose it without a system in casino.

[ADulay]

I really don't wish to argue with anyone about what Albalaha has posted.   I have seen the messages he is claiming to be harsh towards him and they are close but nowhere near being removed but Albalaha removes so many messages in his own threads that a few that carry over in others won't kill him.

I've been casino gambling since the early 1970's and have NEVER had a losing streak of 17 in a row in any game I was playing and I used to be a big roulette phreak in my Bahamas days.

The reason I added to the requests for actual numbers/spins/hands is because I want to play against that evidently bad run and see where I would be bailing out, waiting or just taking the losses and playing on.

Evidently Albalaha is asking if you can survive the 17-20 losses in a row during play.   I want to play it and see if my style can AVOID it.

A Win/Loss registry only shows, well, wins and losses.   Bet a Martingale and you'll lose, obviously.  Flat bet it and you're "only" down 17 at that point in time.  We're all concerned with the middle ground mostly.

How did you get there is the important part to me and evidently a few others.

AD

[MarkTeruya]

The situation is such that, with me as a player who has a lot of time on the game, but does not have a long term winning strategy. It is easier to try and buy such strategies than wasting my time and money on a multi-year experience. I've tried with some reportedly with the success  players ,2 times  pay for strategy, in other cases offered% from winnings.All their strategies have failed.
After hearing assumptions Albalaha strategy, I think it might be a good  system.

It is better to pay for something that can work, than to lose it without a system in casino.

Well you better contact him then pronto, send him your money, but it won't make you a winning player according to the feedback, alternatively give up gambling.  Of course he could simply post his solution here and share for others to evaluate, but he won't.

[Albalaha]

Captain,
             This compilation of harsh sessions came from trackers as I said earlier. IF you did not see 17 losses in a row ever, either you did not play enough or have never tested any method on simulators/excel sheets. I have personally faced streak of 20+ losses many times playing online and in real casinos too I witnessed that. I have done over 100 million simulations on various methods with trackers from over a  dozen programmers. Such streaks are nothing extraordinary. You can see the extremes here: http://albalaha.lefora.com/topic/13069557/Virtual-limits-of-dispersionvariance#.V5b9b_l97IU

In my experience, people lose to casino due to two main reasons:
1. they are not prepared for unfavorable sessions
2. They lose huge in such cases blaming their luck.

I am not asking anyone to do these sessions and showcase. One can use these sessions as acid test for any method.
Those who are not interested can move to other topics. If someone tries to mock me, I will delete the worthless replies from my topic to keep it streamlined. It is within my authority. My topics are not meant for meaningless chit chats.

[MarkTeruya]

In my experience, people lose to casino due to two main reasons:
1. they are not prepared for unfavorable sessions
2. They lose huge in such cases blaming their luck.

You omitted "skilled croupiers" (house burners).

If you haven't come across them or don't believe they exist, then you haven't gambled in B&M casinos enough, or play at a level that they just don't care.   

[Albalaha]

You omitted "skilled croupiers" (house burners).

If you haven't come across them or don't believe they exist, then you haven't gambled in B&M casinos enough, or play at a level that they just don't care.   

             I do not go for voodoo type ideas and look only for mechanical ways to play roulette/baccarat that can be played online too.

[MarkTeruya]

             I do not go for voodoo type ideas and look only for mechanical ways to play roulette/baccarat that can be played online too.

Yeah you're right, you need to bet at least $25 units, before you'll be noticed.

[Blue_Angel]

One can use these sessions as acid test for any method.

Thanks

[Albalaha]

14TH HARSH SESSION:

                126 LOSSES VS 103 WINS.
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W

[Blue_Angel]

@ Albalaha

I've 2 questions regarding your money management:

Is it only for EC bets?

How many units on average a player could expect to win per session?

Thanks in advance

[Albalaha]

Yes the MM is primary meant for EC bets and I consider that as the best bet too. However, one can modify the same for any other bet too.
I recommend playing the same at bv no zero roulette from betvoyager for obvious best expectations.

           Expectation to win depends upon the level of harshness one may need to face. If things are closer to break even, one can expect to win 10 units per 100 spins of betting.