Why can't people just express a though?

That's what this place is for. Not riddles.

Quote from: NathanDetroit on July 23, 2016, 03:46:21 PM
Never attempt to outsmart  the table.

My  method is always predetermined.



For the single 0 wheel  I`ll stick to the First and Third Dozen. Look at the wheel and you`ll  see why .



For the 0/00 wheel  I follow the WASHOO2  2 dozen method.



For recreational purposes nly. Play at your own risk .

Ahh here we go again. 2nd time in 5 min I see you throwing out suggestions about
why this or that is "better". Why not just SAY why. SEPECIFICALLY.

Obviously you can read and type.  Just put it down.

This isn't a game show.


If I had a $1 for every time I see you throw out the SAME vague things,
I could make my living just reading your posts.

"Ah another Nathan post. More carrots on a stick".

Nathan.

Is all you can do is beat the same drum and insult people?

Simple point. We've already established communications in the forum.
Why do we need to jump through other hoops to "find out more"?

I've tested this thing, and overall it requires intuition. Which you are not
willing to say.

Observation.

It looks like whenever you  have a single with a double or
triple, you are "betting against 2 or 3". What that means is
that you play for a chop.

Second, there are a couple places where you bet for the chop and STOP.
And others where you keep playing the chop.

What is the difference?

Atlantis,

How are you playing it?

D'alenbert?

Thanks

What do you think of this response, and methodology.

Is this a "moving target"?

http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16426.new#new

Reply # 45 by Ego. (that's sputnik)

Quote from: Atlantis on February 16, 2016, 04:06:52 PM
Hi Gambler,

Sorry to hear that.
Which way did you try? Sputnik's March 1,2 or 3?
Or did you try BEAT-THE-WHEEL'S way?

I am not sure of how to play the third march;  am waiting to hear from BEAT-THE-WHEEL/PA. to tell me about his idea with  my example I showed a few posts back... I am playing cautiously and winning with the second march!

A.

I like this Atlantis.

Can you remind me about the 2nd march?  I get them
confused.

Thanks

Quote from: BetJack on February 16, 2016, 12:04:11 PM
?? is there  Someone .... who  understood that part ??

Yes.

I have resurrected this topic on the other forum.
http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=16426.new#new

Trying to figure out exactly how it works still.

Reply #210 here seems direct. But it seems like it's one
of many ways to skin the cat, if I read back to the beginning.

(Way # 28.  Crazy glue and a tooth brush)

You mean having 2 as both choices?
I understand.

I THINK you would just bet 2.

But it doesn't address the question of actual money bet.

Quote from: mogul397 on August 31, 2016, 12:35:47 PM
In his original description I think he says to bet both. And I was
hoping that he would clarify that and also show an example of
math for betting. The amounts, and so forth.

Below is his description.
First you get 2 and 3.  You bet vertically and bet "2".
You get the 4.  So for the bottom right spot, you are betting
4 (horizontal) and 3 (vertical).  9 numbers each, as he said.

It almost looks like you would have one vertical choice, followed by
a DOUBLE choice, followed by a vertical.  But I'd like to see how the
betting works out.



Then , going horizontally, left to right you bet for a repeat, or double, or twin.

2 3

No win, carry on - noting that you bet again for 2, because you are going for a vertical twin.

2 3
4

Still no joy, now bet numbers 3 and 4 = 18 numbers in total

2 3
4 4

Quote from: ludo8400 on August 31, 2016, 12:02:49 PM
@Mogul397

We cannot see in the first item from Buffalowizzard what to do, if the vertical and horizontal are the same?

ex.
1 2
2
What to bet after the 2 misses horizontal and vertical?

or we bet 1 and 2.?

What is your opinion?

kindly regards

ludo8400

In his original description I think he says to bet both. And I was
hoping that he would clarify that and also show an example of
math for betting. The amounts, and so forth.

Can you show an example of betting amounts and
profit/loss?

I notice some of your example the 4th is a win, presumably
meaning you bet both horizontal and vertical.

Show how the math would work Please?

Quote from: NathanDetroit on August 27, 2016, 07:42:08 PM
Players have been brainwashed with the HE.If you wanna dance you got to pay the fiddler.


The casino need and want the DROP ( losses from the players ) . They love players trying to win back their losses  and in this process lose even more. The bankroll has been weakened and the casinos  know it.

I understand what you're saying. But to take it a step further, I'm not sure I would
give so much credit to the mentality of the casino.  From where I see it they're all
just a bunch of grunts running around watching and enforcing rules to keep people
in line.  Showing up for work.

For them, it's an ultimate win. They have the time and the pockets. How they feel
can't effect that.

The larger thing that matters for them is getting the business.  Lately that is becoming
more of a problem as they are building casinos like corner drug stores and the competition
for that "drop" is getting harder and harder.

I don't know if the figures are right but someone told me that planrigde (opened June last  year)
had it's revenue drop to 60% or something. They need money ground through the machines.
And the slots are the most reliable.

Quote from: NathanDetroit on August 27, 2016, 07:26:06 PM
Mogul,


As much as I would  love to answer your question my solid money management  includes leaving a session after 3 losses in a row or when I have reached  reached  the loss limit of 25 % of the session bankroll.

Those spread sheets tell  me the  whole story. Therefore take the time and calculate  for yourself.

Here on this forum as well asmn Steve`s RFcc I feel muzzled to speak the truth as  I see it .More and more Orwellian.

MM info for recreational  purposes only. Play at your own risk.

Well talking in riddles doesn't help.  It gets old.  People will only view you as
a "sage" so long. Until the realize you aren't saying anything.

The only fact I can glean from your response is the 25% drawdown. Yes, those
graphs do exibit more than that, it might seem.  Each time. So I suppose a method
where that does or can happen is not for you. Even if it works.