Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - Teorulte

#1
General Discussion / Re: New forum starting - sort of
December 29, 2014, 08:04:44 PM
Can't be too great if I did not get an invite!

;)
#2
Dice Games Forum / Want Live Craps Results
December 24, 2014, 06:13:54 PM
Hi folks,

Does anybody have the 72 hours at the Craps table, Craps System Tester by St. Germain, Ellison's 15 000 rolls at the back of his book, Gamble to Win Advanced Craps, and/or Midgley's 7500 rolls in excel format?  I will trade for them, or even pay for them.  You can PM me.

Thanks.
#3
Quote from: Superman on December 16, 2014, 08:13:51 AM
I've had 1 number sleep for 647 spins when I did the same type of test you have done, and that was probably 5 years ago now. Since then I have deduced, speaking for RNG play at NoZero BetVoyager, the best bet odds you can get is 50/50 could be 18 numbers or red/black, every bets a guess at the end of the day, even on live wheels. Why is 50/50 the best, well, compare it with playing 24 numbers on double dozens, more wins bigger losses, 50/50 medium wins and easier to recover/chase. All my tests lately are purely MM betting 1 colour.

Imspirit ran extensive tests on a perfectly fair 50/50 game and basically just reaffirmed what we believed, and what you post here.  The best I can do (now at least) is just play a non zero wheel.  I remember he had an even chance that stayed ahead of the other for billions or maybe even trillions of spins. 
#4
Bayes,

Thanks for your most helpful post, and attachment!  You really are an asset to the forum, and really know your stuff!  It is a great thing you are a mod here. 

:thumbsup:
#5
Thank you Superman and Dane for the helpful posts!
#6
Hi folks,

I just analyzed 5 million spins but focused on when one of the last two sleepers hit.

There were 42 175 sessions.

Minimum amount of spins before 36/37 numbers hit was 52. 

Maximum amount of spins before 36 out of 37 numbers hit was 314 spins.

Average session length when one of the last 2 sleepers to hit was 118.5 spins.

Median was 115.

Again I have attached a file with the stats in detail.

#7
Quote from: iggiv on December 16, 2014, 01:51:19 AM
525 is an amazing number. Hard to believe but i am sure it's true.
Good lesson for those chasing sleepers. Thank you for interesting info.

You're welcome and thanks for the comment.  :)
#8
Hi folks,

I analyzed 5 million RNG single zero spins to gather some stats about how many spins go by before all 37 numbers have hit.

There were 32 209 sessions. 

Least amount of spins where all 37 numbers hit was 60.  This happened once.  37 numbers hitting in less than 66 spins occurred only 4 times. 

Most amount of spins before all numbers hit was 525.

Average number of spins before all numbers hit was 155.
Median was 147 spins. 

I have attached a file that shows the stats. 

The left is the session length, and the right number is how many times a session ended in the test. 

So:

60   1
61   0
62   0
63   1

Only once a session ended at spin 60 and spin 63 (the last "sleeper" hit on that spin) and never did a session end on spin 61 or 62.
#9
Roulette Forum / Stats for betting 2 dozens
December 14, 2014, 09:45:25 AM
Hi folks,

I analyzed approximately 500 000 cycles and came up with the following when betting on two dozens (I always bet 2 and 3, but it really doesn't matter)


SPINS...37........   50.....75....100....150......200....500....1000
MIN......10   ........18.....31.....43.....68.......95......280.....587
MAX......36.........   46.....64.....84.....122......158....375.....710

So 10 is the minimum number of wins I got in 37 spins, and 36 was the maximum number of wins I got in 37 spins etc.

#10
Roulette Forum / Re: Law of the third stats
December 14, 2014, 08:46:40 AM
Good work Nickmsi.
#11
Roulette Forum / Re: Law of the third stats
December 14, 2014, 08:44:32 AM
Quote from: Turner on December 13, 2014, 10:22:11 PM
Teo

You have saved me doing what I have been meaning to do for ages.

Great stats. Just what I wanted.

don't worry about Albalaha.

Its all about posters like Bayes and Sqeez....and many others.

Thanks for the kind and helpful words.
#12
Roulette Forum / Re: Law of the third stats
December 13, 2014, 07:11:21 PM
Quote from: Bayes on December 13, 2014, 07:09:56 PM
Teo,

You do know that thread starters can remove other member's posts, right?  :thumbsup:

LOL.  I do know that now!  Thanks!   :thumbsup:
#13
Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on December 13, 2014, 08:35:16 AM
Gentlemen,

Thou I not expert,
I think Albalaha is right,
when he says that...

1]Virtual Limit, is a LIMIT,
that an EXTREME can ever happen.

The prove, is 69red/200spins,
is still a RECORD.
We could fully have faith, that the next 200spins of EC will have at LEAST 69 hit.

Albalaha had stressed that u will never see 30red EC in your entire lifetime.

He had always point that if we could take advantages of this phenomena, then we could have an edge over the casino, but of course U need to think out of box.

2]RTM,

Every expert has agreed that the RTM,
will finally 'balanced' itself over the long run, but, no one see that the RTM theory and Virtual Limit, TOGETHER with simple "loss avoiding" strategy, will produce an edge over the run run.

3]Progression.
Many posting have try to search, for a progression as a HG.
But Albalaha, had always emphasized, that no progression ever, can win, in the EXTREME of random, that could happen anytime. That's why they lose.

BUT does anyone listen???


ALAS, every expert can't see those very simple facts...

Actually he is wrong.  He just has not analyzed enough spins.  You could see 30 reds or more.  It is possible. 
#14
Roulette Forum / Re: Law of the third stats
December 13, 2014, 02:09:05 AM
Quote from: esoito on December 12, 2014, 10:35:22 PM
Interesting analysis, as is the almost-symmetry in the figures.

Was that live or RNG?

Thanks for the comment.  I used RNG numbers!
#15
Quote from: BEAT-THE-WHEEL on December 13, 2014, 12:01:29 AM
Thanks Gentlemen,
for yr replies,

The 69/200 is here, from spin 34th.
it an official record, yet to be surpassed. BUT u may win with, SURPRISE...marthy!!!

http://www.laroulette.it/risorse/permanenzimetro/hamburg-1999-1/hamburg-25-10-1999-1/permanence-table

RNG is computer generated, and u will see even 0/200.

I think we need to think out of box to fight random.
Just like farmers plant when the season is right, and fishermen  sail the sea when the weather is right, stay at home when the sea is rough...

Just as likely to see 0/200 in RNG as Real spins, assuming you are testing the same amount for both.