*******7 on 1*******

topcat888 · January 13, 2013, 08:24:30 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 04:54:57 AM
... but you may lead many to commit suicide, believing you.

Really..!?! Are we all that gullible here..?? Whilst this may be a Harebrain idea with an Insane Progression, surely people are not stupid enough to try it if they don't want to lose it..??

Why not just let John carry on proving his systems in peace..?

Albalaha · January 13, 2013, 08:34:09 AM

He has provided his "out of world" stuff already. Would you like to try this?

topcat888 · January 13, 2013, 08:37:51 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 08:34:09 AM
He has provided his "out of world" stuff already. Would you like to try this?

Then just let him do that..? You don't have to try it and neither do I...!

Albalaha · January 13, 2013, 08:47:33 AM

Please read this : http://albalaha.lefora.com/2011/12/04/open-internet-scam-by-casino-affiliates/

7 on 1 is taking/leading towards a hole so deep, nobody would ever be able to recover. If u r interested in playing martingale type things u don't need to be in a discussion forum.
Such"out of world" winning claims upon such a dangerous way to play is nothing else but insanity. I request Bayes, Gizmo, Spike or any other sensible person to test this method and bring forth its reality.

JohnLegend · January 13, 2013, 08:51:46 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 08:34:09 AM
He has provided his "out of world" stuff already. Would you like to try this?

Albalaha, did you bother to read what I wrote at the start of this thread? I said I don't advise ANYONE to play this method unless they have a strong BR and believe in the methods strength.

Funny how you missed that. I simply showed the method to the forum. No one needs to use it. Its just there so you will know one of the methods that won for me.

topcat888 · January 13, 2013, 08:57:13 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 08:47:33 AM
I request Bayes, Gizmo, Spike or any other sensible person to test this method and bring forth its reality.

Can you not manage that yourself..?

Albalaha · January 13, 2013, 09:01:11 AM

John,
I don't have anything personal against you but willingly or unwillingly you are pushing newbies towards a "suicide point". You have said that u have won 900+ sessions without losing even once. If you get even just two-three losses in next 100 sessions, it would take you a month to recover.
Are you claiming to win the world by July, with this?

QuoteCan you not manage that yourself..?

I don't create trackers

JohnLegend · January 13, 2013, 09:02:27 AM

Quote from: esoito on January 13, 2013, 12:58:49 AM

Spike: I've made a note of the date.

And made a copy of posts thus far.

So on that date I'll be looking for some response/feedback on progress at that particular milestone.

Accountability, and all that...

Esoito you will have it. SUPERMAN is my verifier. The problem with Spike is he doesn't look around he reads and believes what he wants to. He says I don't play for real. I put no money where my thoughts/beliefs are.

Who financed Speramus? Who will turn 200 units into tens of thousands? Who will donate 10% of all winnings to this forum? It won't be him will it.?

JohnLegend · January 13, 2013, 09:07:58 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 09:01:11 AM
John,
I don't have anything personal against you but willingly or unwillingly you are pushing newbies towards a "suicide point". You have said that u have won 250+ sessions without losing even once. If you get even just two losses in next 100 sessions, it would take you a month to recover.
Are you claiming to win the world by July, with this?

I don't create trackers

Albalaha im surprised at you. Your total overeaction it unwarranted. Very few play PB at only 7 units buy in. Do you really think anyone will play 7 ON 1 at 242 units buy in???. I simply published the method with Victor's consent to show one of the prime methods I will use to prove I am for real.

And where do you get 250 from. I am 930/0 for 7 ON 1.

Nobody else has to touch it. And I say to everyone else don't. Okay does that get through to you?

Juiced91 · January 13, 2013, 09:15:19 AM

He posted his system YOU don't HAVE to play it. Now get off his back.

[Edited by Moderator]

Albalaha · January 13, 2013, 09:20:04 AM

John,
You claim to win 925 sessions, without a loss, with this. It is indigestible in itself and an exaggeration. Your this method has impractical and out of world triggers as well as progressions. Even someobody starts playing with 10,000 chips, this way, he won't be able to double that, even in an year. He may, rather lose all.
"Pattern Breaker" is far more sensible and worth trying than this.

esoito · January 13, 2013, 09:21:05 AM

JL clearly issued this WARNING in his first post:

"I don't recommend this method for beginners. It requires a large BR. It's an advanced method. "

Can't be much clearer than that!!

Presumably adults on the forum are capable of reading that and then making their own decision.

Some of the posts are way too heated and losing perspective.

I suggest everyone takes a cold shower and waits until 19 July.

Then let's see what's what.

JohnLegend · January 13, 2013, 09:29:11 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 09:01:11 AM
John,
I don't have anything personal against you but willingly or unwillingly you are pushing newbies towards a "suicide point". You have said that u have won 900+ sessions without losing even once. If you get even just two-three losses in next 100 sessions, it would take you a month to recover.
Are you claiming to win the world by July, with this?

I don't create trackers

Albalaha that is my risk. Why are you so concerned? The method hasnt even been challenged yet ON A LIVE WHEEL. Make sure you understand that.

I am showing one of the methods I use to win. The point isn't how much I win. But that I win consistently as I claim. To silence the doubters. Who have called me a liar and charleton. And you know ONE OF THEM very well.

Albalaha · January 13, 2013, 09:42:01 AM

QuoteAlbalaha that is my risk. Why are you so concerned?

I believe that this forum is not your private place so misleading things would affect all and not just me.

Quote"I don't recommend this method for beginners. It requires a large BR. It's an advanced method. "

I can see that very advanced players can play this and would like to know any one of them.
JL,
You have every right to publish your methods here but please do not say that u have won 925 sessions with it, without a single loss. You remind me of Donny Millionaire whose all methods are nothing else but different style to play martingale or even dangerous progressions. Martingale takes time to lose but it loses so badly, recovery isn't possible.
Casinos may call you to felicitate for this marvel of yours.

JohnLegend · January 13, 2013, 09:54:12 AM

Quote from: albalaha on January 13, 2013, 09:42:01 AM

I believe that this forum is not your private place so misleading things would affect all and not just me.

I can see that very advanced players can play this and would like to know any one of them.
JL,
You have every right to publish your methods here but please do not say that u have won 925 sessions with it, without a single loss. You remind me of Donny Millionaire whose all methods are nothing else but different style to play martingale or even dangerous progressions. Martingale takes time to lose but it loses so badly, recovery isn't possible.
Casinos may call you to felicitate for this marvel of yours.

Albalaha, the exact reason I am doing the challenge. Is your doubting thomas attitude. Twister won 500 odd games on an RNG with this. You don't have to believe in it or use it. Step back and relax. I will show what this can do over the coming months and years.