+ Register

[Atlantis]

Just sharing something found this on LTW forum:

The method is simple to play and uses a 1-2 bet , In the description it is like this, if you see a Player then you bet 1 unit player if win keep betting 1 unit player. If you lose to a Banker then you look at PB and now bet 2 units on Banker if this wins you stop bets and wait for another player So you will win on a PP and if you lose then win it will be PBB using a 1-2 bet. Now if it goes  PBP then you lose the 1-2 bet and return to 1 unit on next to be Player if it wins you continue with 1 unit for player, and if win then another 1 unit on player until banker causes the player bet to lose. The win goal is 4 units and buy in is 10 units. This seems like a simple strategy and after playing a shoe I recorded last weekend won my 4 units.  It also says this can be played on the colors of roulette, It seem like such a low bet structure and low buy in, I was wondering if anyone took time to test the method out? If so what was the % shoes won with 4 units verses the loss of 10 units.

A.

[ADulay]

Well, it sees simple enough but the play description can be interpreted a few ways.

Would you like to play this recent (Aug 6th) shoe from DublinBet to confirm the play style?

AD

PBBBB PPPPB PBPPP PPBPP  (1st 20 hands)
BPBPB BBPBB BBPBB PPBBB  (2nd 20 hands)
PPPPB PBPBB BPPPP B   (final 16 hands)

[Atlantis]

PBBBB PPPPB PBPPP PPBPP  (1st 20 hands)                 = +1
BPBPB BBPBB BBPBB PPBBB  (2nd 20 hands)              = +1
PPPPB PBPBB BPPPP B   (final 16 hands)                        = +3
Played as 3 separate individual sessions.

If played as continuous session:
PBBBB PPPPB PBPPP PPBPP  BPBPB BBPBB BBPBB PPBBB PPPPB PBPBB BPPPP B  = +5

A.

[ADulay]

OK, my second interpretation of your description is evidently the one you are talking about and use.

Thanks.

AD

[Tomla]

Fun little system--I tested two shoes and got ahead  4 in both of them

[Rolex-Watch]

Anybody work out the Achilles heel for this?

[Tomla]

what's the achilles---PBPBPBPB...... ?

[Rolex-Watch]

what's the achilles---PBPBPBPB...... ?

That is what I thought, you don't want to be losing against chops they are too prevalent.

[AsymBacGuy]

Practically the system dictates to bet toward the streaks' formation on both sides. Specifically, the 2+ streak Banker formation and the x streak P formation.

According to long statistical findings, this is one of the worst bet selection a player can make since the most common outcome, as already stated above and elsewhere, is the chopping mood, even on the Banker side.

Nevertheless, imo the idea is somewhat interesting about other features.

as.   

 



     

[Tomla]

I bet towards chopping Asym ---And the way I read this its not betting on Banker streaks , just Player streaks.....To me it's a cool play if playing with a partner.. (I love partner play but it's like marriage difficult to do ))...both guys should win but if my style is in a temporary lull this would cover a bit of hurt

[AsymBacGuy]

I bet towards chopping Asym ---And the way I read this its not betting on Banker streaks , just Player streaks.....To me it's a cool play if playing with a partner.. (I love partner play but it's like marriage difficult to do ))...both guys should win but if my style is in a temporary lull this would cover a bit of hurt

Hi Tomla!

I took your interesting point about  "partners" play... 

as.         

[Leapyfrog]

My first and only casino I have been.  Hippodrome in London. It says partnership betting is not allowed.  Do you know why they would say so?

[Atlantis]

The method is simple to play and uses a 1-2 bet , In the description it is like this, if you see a Player then you bet 1 unit player if win keep betting 1 unit player. If you lose to a Banker then you look at PB and now bet 2 units on Banker.
If this wins you stop bets and wait for another player.

So you will win on a PP and if you lose then win it will be PBB using a 1-2 bet.

Now if it goes PBP then you lose the 1-2 bet and return to 1 unit on P next time Player occurs.

If it wins you continue with 1 unit for player, and if win then another 1 unit on player until banker causes the player bet to lose.

The win goal is 4 units and buy in is 10 units.

This seems like a simple strategy and after playing a shoe I recorded last weekend won my 4 units.

It also says this can be played on the colors of roulette; It seem like such a low bet structure and low buy in. I was wondering if anyone took time to test the method out? If so what was the % shoes won with 4 units verses the loss of 10 units.

Example of  this strategy applied on single zero roulette:
Example 50 random results played on roulette. Same r/b results used for both outcomes (triggers in bold)
Betting stopped if a 0 occurs during betting until next trigger.

Target = +4

If Playing RED Side:
============
b
b
b
0
r
r w+1              +1
b L-1               +0
b w+2              +2
b
r
r w+1              +3
r w+1              +4
r w+1              +5
r w+1              +6
b L-1               +5
b w+2             +7
b
r
r w+1              +8
r w+1              +9
r w+1              +10
b L-1               +9
r L-2                +7
b
r
b L-1               +6
0 L-2               +4
b
b
r                   
r w+1              +5
b L-1               +4
b w+2              +6
b   
b
b
b
r
b L-1                +5
b w+2               +7
b
r
b L-1               +6
r L-2                +4
b
r
r w+1              +5
b L-1               +4
r L-2                +2
r

End of 50 spins.

w = +18
L = -16
Profit = +2
High = +10


If Playing BLACK side:
=============
b
b  w+1      +1
b  w+1      +2
0  L-1       +1
r
r
b
b  w+1      +2
b  w+1      +3
r   L-1       +2
r  w+2       +4
r
r
r
b
b w+1        +5
b w+1        +6
r  L-1         +5
r  w+2        +7
r
r
b
r  L-1         +6
b L-2         +4
r
b
0 L-1          +3
b
b w+1         +4
r L-1           +3                     
r w+2          +5
b
b  w+1        +6
b  w+1        +7
b  w+1        +8
b  w+1        +9
b  w+1        +10
r  L-1          +9
b  L-2         +7       
b
b  w+1        +8
r  L-1          +7
b  L-2         +5
r
b
r  L-1          +4
r  w+2         +6
b
r  L-1          +5
r w+2         +7

End of 50 spins.

w = +23u
L = -16u
Profit = +7
High = +10

A.

[Atlantis]

Here is an attached test1.txt file with a modified rule:

Play it as a 1-1 bet instead of 1-2

Only play second stage of bet at 2u *if 3 or more wins in a row gained at stage 1 (betting chosen color) before a loss happens*

A.

PS.

Another bet selection for an EVENS flatbet stake system would be to follow the CHOP and/or bet that a STREAK of 2 will end.

For example:

R,B - bet for chop to continue eg: R

B, B - bet for streak to end eg: R

If  a sequence of 3 consecutive colours occurs eg: B, B, B - no bet until change of colour occurs where you will then bet on the CHOP ie. B in this instance.

[marvin]

looks like follow the last but only on one side?