Quote from: alrelax on June 03, 2017, 06:09:06 AM
You are a better man for making up someone's past, I can only assume.

Well, I won't be posting on here, any longer so you can have the run of place for all I care, hey hey.

Quote from: brokerny on June 02, 2017, 09:22:15 PM
Sox, 1 unit = $100?

My base unit is 25$, hey hey.

A coupla cats on here have told me that they are using my progression style with good result and I am glad for that. The alrelax once claimed to have lost millions bucking up against the baccarats over the years and I can certainly believe that. But then, he makes important postings about the spicy sauces and most of you cats can lap that up, hey hey.

Well, I certainly won't waste my time posting on here, any longer. I'll leave it to 'nice guys' like the alrelax to post nonsense and nonsenses as most here are not serious in the least. You can all ooh and aahh over a couple of out of the ordinary shoes in isolation as if that has any bearing on serious cats trying to make a serious income from the game in the medium to longer term, hey hey.

Well cats. still grindin it out, hey hey.

Session Three

shoe 1: WLWLWWWLWLWLWWWLWWLLLLLWWWLWLWLLLWWWWWWWLLWLL +18units gross profits

shoe 2: WWWLWWWWLLWLLWLWLWWWWWLLWWWLLWW +16 units gross profits


session total: 34 units gross profits

Well, I'm a coupla days behind in my report so gonna pony up for you cats. The old adage is true, some day you get the bear and some day the bear gets you. And, I got clipped in my second session of this week, hey hey.

Session Two


early shoe: WLLWLWWLWLLLWLWLWWWLLLLLLLWLLWLLLL -96 unit CLIPPED!!!!



late shoe: WWWWLLLWWWWWWLWWWLLWWWWLWWWLLLLLWWWLLLWWLWWL +25 units gross profits



session total: -71 unit

Well, cats, my week got off to the good start so, here it is, hey hey.

Session One

shoe 1: WWLWWLWWWWWLLLWLWLWWW +13 units gross profits

session total: +13 units gross profits

Quote from: Babu on May 16, 2017, 06:40:20 AM
That maybe be the distribution for a lot of 8 deck shoes but if you play 8 plus shoes a day, you will know that this not the distribution for all shoes.  There will be shoes consisting of two 5 streaks, 2 6 streaks and a few streaks greater than 6 for example.

Regardless of how you manage your money or use martingale for anti-streak, the end result is a fail if you play enough shoes.  This applies to those waiting after 4 or 5 streaks to do anti-streak or chop.  Here is the exact reason:

According to your distribution, singles, doubles and shorter streaks happen more frequent.  Here is where a lot of people don't see.  There are just the same amount of singles as there are doubles since streaks of 3s contain doubles, streaks of 4s contain doubles, streaks of 5 contain doubles and so on.  If you add all those doubles, it will very closely equal to singles.  You can also go up the later and compare doubles with streaks of 3s and so on.  This is why every bet is only a difference of a little over 1%. 

This is why those claiming to win anti-streaking is lying.  Same goes to those claiming success by following streaks and chops for the LONG RUN

Wrong, the streaks distribution are AVERAGES that play out true over time. In the short term you can get clipped but over time the result smooth out and you can count on them. That's why anti-streak style is the only mechanical style that will win regular and well, hey hey.

Quote from: Babu on May 26, 2017, 08:20:47 PM

Given the scenario you mention, it means you failed to parlay the previous units.  I'm sure you understood that because you got the -53.   So now you are trying to parlay 20.   First bet, you win.  Now you will parlay and bet 40.  If you win that, you will have 80-your original 20=60 gain.  60-53= 7 units.

That is exactly correct, hey hey.

Quote from: Babu on May 26, 2017, 08:17:49 PM
If you can manage to capture two consecutive wins for each run, I would say this will work well.  I personally can't do it. 

I'm NOT saying you can't just because I couldn't or most people couldn't.  Good luck on the weekend.

In Beat the Casino book the Frank Barstow talk about an old timer who made a good living for 30 year just using the parlay style at the dice table, hey hey.

Quote from: 21 Aces on May 26, 2017, 07:58:17 PM
-53 units + 20 units + 27 units = -6 units

Nope, you gotta parlay the 20 unit, hey hey.

I'm gonna pony up all of the w/l cluster result for ALL 30 shoe I buck up against this coming week, so cats can see how my style plays out. And yes, I do have some losing week so I will pony up the result good, bad or ugly without picking cherry, hey hey.

Cats are makin this waaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy too difficult. You simply need to capture the back to back win at any stage to capture profit and reset progression to first bet, hey hey.

Quote from: alrelax on May 25, 2017, 01:36:17 AM
13 step negative progression would be a 40,960.00 wager on the 13th step with a first sling wager of 10.00.  About 80,000.00 risk to make 10.00.  Tables limits would forbid it anyway.

Are you really the john-O, for real, hey hey?

With my style I could win well and regular winning under 17% of my placed bet. And, now on average I get clipped for 5 progression bust for every hundred shoe, so I make cake on the other 95 shoe and easily offset the progression busts and skate with a nice profit, hey hey.