Quote from: stringbeanpc on September 29, 2017, 04:13:00 PM
Victor,

Will you provide a list some of these casinos ?

Why not use GOOGLE yourself ?

For example, type in:    casinos + cryptocurrency

It's not hard to think of other search words!

Well done, Nick 

That should leave the flat-bet-naysayers more than a bit red-faced!

Quote from: greenguy on September 25, 2017, 12:00:35 PM

Just my opinion, of course.

As you say, just your opinion.  It's hardly surprising, given that I've had to moderate you in the past -- some things can't be ignored.

Hopefully I won't have to again.  But that's up to you, of course.

After all, the vast majority of regular posters choose to abide by the simple rules, and never need to be moderated.

We have some pretty interesting threads and discussions going on at the moment.

We have 2067 members. And yet, of those, only 268 have ever posted.  Just 13% are doing all the work.

In other words, 87% of the members take all and give nothing back to the forum.

We have rules intended to protect members. We have moderators who do their best to enforce those rules, so that members can feel able to post without fearing personal attacks or similar immature behaviour.

All ideas...thoughts...imaginings...research....resources... You name it -- we're interested.

So come on you 87% -- let's have some participation.  Give us all the benefit of your grey matter 

Now here's a thought I recently encountered on the BBC site: 

'Inversion' is a strategy that looks at problems in reverse, to minimise the negatives instead of maximising the positives'

Why would that strategy not be applicable to bet selection?  [Any replies in the discussion thread, please]

OK.

For reasons best known to yourself you choose not to explain the various terms used.

Perhaps you think we all know them, because we somehow acquired that knowledge by osmosis as we eat our breakfast cereal.

My apologies for daring to ask for clarification. Silly me...

Blue_Angel wrote: "Sometimes the best way to predict the future is to create it!"

Indeed.  And the role of visualisation is involved to some extent in creating a desired outcome which is, of course, an element of a future.

http://www.spring.org.uk/2011/03/the-right-kind-of-visualisation.php

http://www.silvalifesystem.com/online/lessons/4-visualization


I use "a future " deliberately rather than  "the future" because there are a multiplicity of futures.

For example, each time you make a decision you create several alternative futures -- there's the one in which you make the opposite decision, and there's the one in which you did not make a decision.

But your reality is based on the future created by the decision you made, and that future has become your current 'now'. The other futures exist but remain unvisited by you.

There ya go. I'll leave you to unpick the threads and notions in this post. Doctor Who fans shouldn't have too much trouble!

Thanks Blue_Angel. Very interesting.

As a followup we can add this:

Expanding on the work of Marko Rodin, Randy Powell explains vortex math and the ABHA Torus from the beginning. Randy says with Vortex-Based Mathematics we will be able to see how energy is expressing itself mathematically.

http://globalbem.com/program/randy-powell/


For those who need some reassurance this is not a load of baloney then

• download the PDF from  http://www.free-energy-info.com/Rodin.pdf
  
  
  • turn to pages25ff for high profile contributors and supporters of his work
    

Learn to visualise your data.  Very interesting for those who want to raise their testing a few notches:

http://flowingdata.com/

REMOTE VIEWING ROULETTE NUMBERS

https://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=15635.0

Some of you will recognize  participants in this interesting thread.

By the way, it's worth watching Nowun's videos.

I'm probably the only person here who understood only about one word in three, and for whom most of the specialised terminology flew right over my head.

After all, someone familiar with it all can so easily forget that, for many others, this sort of technology and arena is totally outside their experience.

They [and I]  need an interpreter!

I offer that feedback more as well-intended advice than as a criticism.

This site might [or it might not!] help you make more sense of the above, difficult-to-follow exposition:

http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/gadgets/a7355/spooky-quantum-entanglement-created-in-everyday-objects-6606439/

To me, that is a brilliant post, that encapsulates what this forum is basically all about.

I congratulate you on your careful choice of words, and the care with which you constructed that post.

Very impressed...

Cracking Pi Cracking Random

Quote 1
"In 2004, the Statistical Laboratory at University California Santa Barbara tested him with 100 flips of a coin. He successfully predicted and found a precise .04166.... flat bet advantage. The Lab then repeated the experiment with 100 "coin flips" from a random number generator. Again he successfully predicted and found a precise .04166.... flat bet advantage."


Quote 2
"On March 14, 2006, the Buffalo Evening News published an article in which their reporter tested him with a random number generator. He successfully predicted the precise random outcomes of electronic card turnovers with a .16666 flat-bet advantage."


If those two quotes pique your interest then:   http://www.crackingpi.com/   Be sure to also click the About tab when you arrive there.


Action At A Distance seems to be an important concept...important enough for The Vatican to have once banned study of it.

They seem to be a bit more enlightened these days:  http://www.vofoundation.org/blog/spooky-action-distance-part-one/

This post is for information only -- definitely not as a recommendation.

http://www.1centroulette.com/en/index.html

Good luck with finding details about them.  Shrouded in secrecy and mystery.

The jurisdiction might be Costa Rica but it's hard to tell for sure.

Furthermore, the RNG used is not one of the usual offerings. Goodness knows what rigged, anti-winning-code might have been written into it.

The site offers no statements about  fair play, random control and the like.