I'm throwing the link.

https://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4551.msg225449#msg225449

Just read 2 last posts and you will know what I mean.
I writes here about the greatest possible reduction of HE, which is possible.
I am sure you will need this and I will gladly hear how you can improve it.
Mr. Ore writes about HE reduction by 1.1%, this is really good.
MM is simply the first bet 1 unit on EC, the second bet 1 units on 1 dozen, after lose third bet 3 units on EC.
The assumption was to always earn 1 unit or lose 5 units

This MM is intended for roulette, but I modified it a little which will increase the number of bets and expose us to HE but it will cause something better.
If I would choose, I would choose, for example, a permanent PLAYER selection.
MM would look like this
first bet 1 unit on our EC, if we lose 1 unit on EC, if we lose 3 units on EC, it was like in basic strategy, in case of loss we have -5 units.
The modification I introduced concerns the second bet which was 1 dozen, I just stretched it to 2 bets EC, which gives us the same odds.
It looks like this first bet is 1 unit, and we lose
And now secend bet is 1 unit on EC and we win, then we play one more bet for 1 unit, if we win we have our goal + 1 unit and end this sequence of progression, in the event of losing our second bet on the second level, we are only 1 units on minus and we play the next bet for 2 units.  In this sequenceof  progression  we  lose  only 3 units.

Modification gave us a stretch of progression by one bet, but it saved us 2 units.

Hi
I have such a question related to casino industry in Vegas
We know that high rollers players can sometimes count on a return of% from their loses.
But in extreme cases when they generate high turnover they can count on a zero-free game on European roulette?
I know this topic was already raised a long time ago.
We know that Vegas have a wheel on European rules only the stakes are bigger there.
Maybe someone has heard of such a possibility in Europe?

Some time ago, I played with BV nozero roulette.
The strategy was very simple, used a trend bet selection and John Patrick's regression.

Bet selection
When I started sessions waited for 2 different dozen , and Play That they repeat, Play That 2dozens till  lose. In this way we play each spin, because if you fall out sleeper, we have 2 different last dozens.

Regression
We go up when we win
4-2-3-4-5
  when we come to 5 units and the win, session is over
stop lose is 3 attempts, if the lose 3 times first bet ,end session.

To my surprise, after a few thousand spins, BR was positive.
I do not think this will continue in the long run, but the results were very interesting.
I do not play this strategy further for lack of time.

I put it some time ago, in another topic but no one specifically did not answer, if it may act.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kO0Jf5tdITQ




Chasing the dragon bonus with card counting certainly is effective.
I wonder if the claim of the counting in the standard baccarat is real and whether we have advantage plaing Player?


  Here is the entire text of the description of the film




Counting cards at baccarat and blackjack with the multipurpose JSTAT Count. A winning card counting strategy/tutorial on how to beat the casinos. EZ Baccarat's Dragon 7 side bet is also revealed.

Casino/Advantage Play consultant Eliot Jacobson did a a card counting analysis of the EZ Baccarat Dragon 7 side bet that was published on the Wizard of Odds site in 2011. Using a linear count simulation, Jacobson concluded a shoe depleted of more eights and/or nines than normal provided an advantage for the Dragon 7 side bet which pays 40-1. I upped the ante by including the JSTAT Count (2-9=+1 and 10-K=-2) with a side counting of 8/9's and have been very successful playing in casinos. It only makes sense that a winning three card banker 7 cannot happen with a ten card (on plus JSTAT Counts) along with the 8/9's as a third card in this non-linear count.

As an additional bonus, I discovered the JSTAT Count with the side counting (and the lack of) of 8/9's remaining in the shoe with minus counts works very well with Player Bets in conventional mini/midi baccarat. A deck particularly poor of 8's/9's and ten value cards diminish the power of the third card rule favoring the Banker side. Because any 8 or 9 and ten card value as third card determine many times the standing Banker action where the Banker takes the most of its advantage. Moreover whenever a deck is poor of 8's,9's and 10's frequently, it means that more small-medium cards are available to catch for Player side as third card. Obviously the (slight) main effect favoring the Player side is due to the second issue, along with the fact the Player bets are paid 1.1 and not 0.95:1

If used correctly, Las Vegas Strip/Atlantic City/Macau/Indian and other casinos will face a winning strategy which gamblers brings home winnings from the greedy casino gambling industry.

Side counting the 8/9's are just as effective in blackjack as it is in the EZ Baccarat Dragon 7 side bet or conventional baccarat. At blackjack, on plus JSTAT Counts with more 8/9's remaining than normal, our double downs will approve on 10/11 and the dealer will bust more often than average. In my opinion, the side counting of 8/9's with the JSTAT Count enhances card counting at blackjack and baccarat to the point of long-term wins.

Today I read on another forum about hybrid progression.
It is not my idea, but we can try.
Played today, this strategy on roulette Nozero BV
After we open new session, waiting until the first 19-20 spins,  if we haven't  6 in a row doubeldozens 1-2, when we begin to trigger bet on dozen1 and 2 with positive progresion after win we going up , after lose the start at begining
1-1
2-2
3-3
4-4
5-5
6-6

If we win 6 steps in the progression reset, and start with 1-1 unit, if we are to any positive territory we finish sessions and open new window.
This is not the end of progression if we are - 42 units begin to use progressions + 1, -1
  If we are -42 units we play 2-2 4-4 6-6 8-8 10-10 12-12
If we are - 126 units 3-3 6-6 ............
    -252 4-4 8-8 12-12 .........
and so on
if we win on the high step just reduce the degree
BR session is 1,000 units.

Hello. I have to share with you the strategy from another forum, from topic Tomla, I play it with stoploss 8 units and 7 units target, as far 8 sessions and win and 1 lost.

http://www.gamblingforums.com/threads/trend-or-anti-trend.41/

Recently I thought over the use of imbalance in the first 40 spins.Let say 11black and 26 red, we always use the EC imbalance of 15 to start betting, and try with long mild proggresion but always fail. I began to think of the use of short progresion, which ends a spin up to 60. What kind of progression you use make 1 unit profit. I think about something like this 11111222224444488888

Always play roulette, this is my first baccarat system.

We play anti choppy streaks, we wait for triggers PBPB or BPBP now waiting to the end of streak and start play FTL using Tomla progresion, our target with one trigger is 1 unit.

Tomla progression is 1 1 1 1 1 ,1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 ,2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ,3 3 3 3 3 .... we stay at 3 unit to the new high

Bankroll  100 units    ,   10%   session  target   profit.

We tracking   all  EC   bets   , if  we    got   imbalance    of   10  bets   in   first  35   spins    we  start playing
(Ex. 21  red   to  11 black)   we   use   Kav  progression   from  topic   below.
I   use   trackers      for   statistic  ,   and   Nick tracker   for  progression
stop  lose   500 units  ,   cosino  BV   No zero


http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=13422.msg115972#msg115972

What do  You  think  about this kind  strategy.
We wait for  imbalance  of  EC bets  in last 100 spins ,let say 60  and  more blacks  to 40 or less reds ,  and  start  placing  bet on  reds  to  balance  with soft  progression  111222333444...
we  go  up  only  after 3  straight loses.  Bankroll   300 units.
We  play  all  EC  .
60  to  40   is  for live  wheels,   for  RNG  i  think 65 to 35 ,or  even more.
This  is mechanical progression  and  we  lose  at  some   point  ,  but  mayby make more than  lose.