+ Register

[james]

Try D'Alembert betting in google.

[21 Aces]

Try D'Alembert betting in google.

Thanks!  If Dr. Tom mentioned it was a French name or more details, it would have been helpful.  My spelling was so off.

[toknoy]

poss, the originator of this discussion, whatever happened to his results using Tom's system?Or, anyone in this forum using the system with success or no success?   

[backudos]

nope. another useless system

[Racoon123]

I bought this system for $750, and it is quite complex. It worked for awhile, then like all systems started to fail. I also saw some of Dr. Toms actual shoes and when he gets to a point of failure he does not follow his own rules for bet placement, and those shoes show a win. I wondered if he posted errors, asked him, and got no reply. So, does he show only shoes that win, or does he 'past post'? I don't know, but him not replying made me wonder.

[Racoon123]

As to the question of "is it worth it to purchase?" My answer is no, do not purchase. Only as good as all the other systems out there. Eventually fails, and way to complex to use. With it being so complex, often you will not have time in between hands to figure what you want to bet and to get it down on the table. I know of two others who bought the system, and found the same problem, and after it started to fail for them they shelved it also. Dr. Tom is a good guy but the system is too complex and does fail.
I have moved on to my own system which is fluid and I am at a daily average of $87.56 since January 1 2017. Am at $18,390 for the year.

[alrelax]

No mechanical system can prevail the way they promise.  Once you understand the true directions the shoe is capable of, your wins will come.

[backudos]

Well another one hit the dust

[Barron518]

Yes, creating your own strategy or system of play is the way to go. This community (forum) offers a lot of ideas as to how one can create his or her own system of play. Keep in mind that there are some tough days when you are at the table. I would include in my strategy as how to handle it when a tough day arises- stop loss, change table, or quit? Your choice.

Cheers!!

As to the question of "is it worth it to purchase?" My answer is no, do not purchase. Only as good as all the other systems out there. Eventually fails, and way to complex to use. With it being so complex, often you will not have time in between hands to figure what you want to bet and to get it down on the table. I know of two others who bought the system, and found the same problem, and after it started to fail for them they shelved it also. Dr. Tom is a good guy but the system is too complex and does fail.
I have moved on to my own system which is fluid and I am at a daily average of $87.56 since January 1 2017. Am at $18,390 for the year.

[backudos]

right. better create  your own system rather than following Dr. Tom, hehehe

[Barron518]

Congratulations on your winning strategies,  Backudo!!

quote author=backudos link=topic=5616.msg58887#msg58887 date=1501988212]
right. better create  your own system rather than following Dr. Tom, hehehe
[/quote]

[backudos]

Thank you. Same to you Barron

[greeneclipse]

poss, the originator of this discussion, whatever happened to his results using Tom's system?Or, anyone in this forum using the system with success or no success?   

No it did not work for me I tend to flat bet and after reading stephen tabone's book I'm afraid to double down. Can't wait to read his 3.0 book. does anyone know when it comes out on amazon?

[alrelax]

No it did not work for me I tend to flat bet and after reading stephen tabone's book I'm afraid to double down. Can't wait to read his 3.0 book. does anyone know when it comes out on amazon?

Jack off Stephen, taking over Vic's board, plain and simple.

This is Stephen, I will go ahead and say it.  A dirty spade is a dirty spade, plain and simple.  The writing style, the attack, the 'know where all the posts are', it is Stephen waiting for the day his garbage (IMO) book came out, and maybe i just do have a damn copy!  If you keep pushing the way you have, I will do exactly what I did the last time around bro---I called your bluff with Vic.  I will do it again and buddy boy--you have a lot more lose than I do.  I will again, obtain your book, take pictures and write reviews on all major gambling sites, I promise that, I swear that over a couple of little kids life's close to me--it is okay when the result of what I am swearing is true.

I will also state, there is no way that the sudden 'rash' of  all the brand new (BY PROXY IP) members are not Stephen, no possible psychical way. This board is screwed, Vic---do something.  Delete all the new accounts the past couple of days, they are all Stephen's accounts, plain and simple.

First and very last warning Stephen, take it as gospel.  I will inundate gambling sites with no less than 12 or more reviews each with your book and you can rest assured, no one will be buying a copy.  So keep it up with your retarded gay airline pilot thing and the other few proxies you have going on.  I will do what I said and you will not like it, and they will all be real reviews from a real person of your book! I swear to GOD!

[Sputnik]

I will clear some minds and see if we all can agree, i read about many losing system that has been about flat betting even money position, but i learn something from most of them ...
For example once i got some one coding Marigny De Grilleau work, so when i say is winning or losing i can prove my point with statistical significant results.
Also during this point i among other notice that you can play one side by it self and get the same result as using both random streams.

As you see two simple things come out of a methodology during thinking and development process.
But that was the easy part, then come advance improvments to the learning curve.
For example if your expectation is to win +1 units following a march and lose your first bet, then your expectation and variance change during the games process, as you are now -1 and need to win twice to get to +1 unit flat betting ,,, then other solutions comes to mind as winning two in a row using smooth 30 step progression.

My point is that no matter what or who, so does it means something to learn new things from the core of your thinking and development process when tackle even money bets.
One thing i never been thinking about before i read Stephen book was that you can let the last unit ride and strike if you have a run of something - that make a difference - my opinion.
That is a tiny additional improvment or option to add if you have the right method.
I can list many other things that open my mind into things i know and things i did not know before and after reading Stephen book - but i won't as i made my point.

It does not matter if system fail or win we can learn things from that, details that might work with other solutions and i am not only talking about Stephen i talk about everything.
I deal with at least 3 to 10K random bits each day playing the game online or making furhter development.
So the hole process to get more skills and never stop learning is 5 starts in my book for does who agree.