Here we go again with 1 in 3 odds using three different formations that has the same random distribution as three dozen.
What i want to show with this example is how each formation can strike for several times in a row or all three formations can alternate.
That is one selection process using this concept, another concept is to bet against the strikes.
The selection process has such high quality so i have been testing with with positiv progression and mild progression and winning two in a row concept.
I post the selection formations or sequence patterns before and will copy the material and explain how, when and why to place your bets in certain ways.
Cheers
Quote from: Sputnik on October 29, 2017, 06:54:07 PM
Here we go again with 1 in 3 odds using three different formations that has the same random distribution as three dozen.
What i want to show with this example is how each formation can strike for several times in a row or all three formations can alternate.
That is one selection process using this concept, another concept is to bet against the strikes.
The selection process has such high quality so i have been testing with with positiv progression and mild progression and winning two in a row concept.
I post the selection formations or sequence patterns before and will copy the material and explain how, when and why to place your bets in certain ways.
Cheers
Hi Sputnik,
This is interesting. Hoping to hear more details from you.
Best regards,
jsintl
I just want to show the strength behind the selection method - this is winning two in a row without progression - flat betting - but there is variance so in the end you need a mild progression
W W
L W L W W
W L L W L W W
W W
L W L W W
L L W L W L W W
W W
W L W W
L L W L W L W W
L L W W
W W
W L W L W W
W W
L W L L L
+2
+2
+2
+2
+1
+2
+1
+0
+2
+2
+0
+2
+2
+2
-3
Quote from: Sputnik on November 03, 2017, 06:44:43 PM
I just want to show the strength behind the selection method - this is winning two in a row without progression - flat betting - but there is variance so in the end you need a mild progression
W W
L W L W W
W L L W L W W
W W
L W L W W
L L W L W L W W
W W
W L W W
L L W L W L W W
L L W W
W W
W L W L W W
W W
L W L L L
+2
+2
+2
+2
+1
+2
+1
+0
+2
+2
+0
+2
+2
+2
-3
Hi Sputnik,
This is really interesting.
More details if it's all possible.
Best regards,
jsintl
2 hits in a row for 18 out of 37 has less chance than a single hit for 12 out of 37.
On first case you have 24.32% probability and on the second 32.43%.
There's 8.11% difference.
Just the facts
Hi Sputnik,
Please share more of your head....
Thanks
Hello i will explain - but at the moment i am deep into sportbetting so maybe next week ...
Is really the best of the best - my opinion.
Cheers
Looking forward to it.
Thanks
Baelog