If we just, say , bet red, for next100spin,
We will also hit by permutations,
THAT have deadly and marvelous STREAKS.
THUS, we must have a betselection, that seized the streaking to the hilt!
1) betselection that hit within math expectation.
2) betselection that seized the streaks to the hilt.
There are some permutations that won't RTM.
say after 100spins, the blacks will have more hit than thd red
Thus we must
3) have betselection that follow the leader.
The progression must mild, that take advantage of STREAKY ...
Say, bet 1u for 50spins ,then 2u for next 50spins...
Thus if the 100 spins has streaky, then will produce profit, if not the losses won't severe.
1u for 50spins,
2u for 50spins,
4u...
8u....martingale, stretcheeeed...
Trillion dollar question again,
Do you have a betselection, that always hit within the negative mathexpectation, flatbet.
4) mild progression, to avoid huge losses.
We will also hit by permutations,
THAT have deadly and marvelous STREAKS.
THUS, we must have a betselection, that seized the streaking to the hilt!
1) betselection that hit within math expectation.
2) betselection that seized the streaks to the hilt.
There are some permutations that won't RTM.
say after 100spins, the blacks will have more hit than thd red
Thus we must
3) have betselection that follow the leader.
The progression must mild, that take advantage of STREAKY ...
Say, bet 1u for 50spins ,then 2u for next 50spins...
Thus if the 100 spins has streaky, then will produce profit, if not the losses won't severe.
1u for 50spins,
2u for 50spins,
4u...
8u....martingale, stretcheeeed...
Trillion dollar question again,
Do you have a betselection, that always hit within the negative mathexpectation, flatbet.
4) mild progression, to avoid huge losses.