+ Register

[alrelax]

'Blind Guessing', versus 'What's Brewing', 2 huge and separate events that baccarat players either engage in or discovered how to identify and use to their advantage, that separate the experienced ones from the new or hard-headed ones.

Identifiable events versus non-identifiable.  Both, really do exist within every baccarat shoe.

Comes out; Will come out and you are not stopping it, changing it or mathematically knowing what will.  The how, why, when, matching up or—doesn't match up.  All of it does not matter as to there is no definitive mathematical formula as to 'how' the shoe produces or does not produce what it does.  But the fact is, that all the hard headed mathematical wizards and casino/gambling statisticians defend until their death beds-some kind of phony criteria that will happen after 'such and such' an event appears, etc., will never be able to be converted to a gamblers true advantage to place repetitive and consistent wagers where they are guaranteed to win 51% or better of their wagers.  Never, ever. 

There is no science such as forensics with baccarat.  Person shot with a gun.  At what angle, DNA and numerous other scientific or forensic results can determine how something was consummated.  However, the 'emotional intelligence' of the shooter can never be the same for everyone committing a murder and why he/she desired to do so.  Same as the events in baccarat and how a player will wager on something as well as the reasoning why. 

The ability to identify: Events—Maintain Positive Motivation—Possess an Upbeat Aura—Create Real Group Camaraderie & Have a Tremendous Amount of Confidence all play vital positive key roles with players in wagering processes with larger and quicker win amounts rather than those that possess and ooze with: Aggravation—Frustration-- Believe in Actual Guessing-- Possess Depression & Unconfident decision making processes and frame-of-minds. 

[alrelax]

People always bring up, "To win on a regular basis", all you have to do is such and such or follow, so and so.  Whether that is the VinSap count or anything like that perpetrated on another 'elite website' with 'professional multi million dollar consistent baccarat winners', etc., etc., or wagering banker only player only and so on.  What is 'regular'?  What is a 'session'?  What is a 'win'?  I would say almost every player's fate of success lies in one thing.  Which is, what almost no one will even take into consideration, the 'reset and refresh' protocol and belief by the gambler? 

Almost every one I every tried to talk with regarding those will come back with a snotty attitude citing, their own 'loss stop', etc.  And in reality all that does if they actually do follow such a thing, is to pile up the losses that their smaller win ratio will be lucky if they can get even or stay even.  Best case scenario in reality, is they push their funds and stay even or close to even.  Their frame-of-minds will not allow them to wager anything outside of their safe zone that might incur a larger risk.  Their safe zone will not be enough to allow them to absorb their losses and do well off of wins.  No matter what unit size they are playing with.  Does not matter.

Then those people all cited point to Don Johnson or Phil Ivy, etc.  Those famous/infamous gamblers are not using a system.  They were on a classic heater and that is it.  Period.   Otherwise they would do it every single time they gamble.  They lose also, but those times are not publicized, LOL. 

It is the application what actually counts.  Not so much the experience and knoweldge, although it can help you or haunt you-depending on the way you apply your experience and knowledge.  The application of each wager will determine if a wager is won or lost.  Not the experience or knowledge.  Can you win with experiences and knowledge more than you can without?  Some will argue until their death beds, that you can not apply without proper experience and knowledge and others will argue that experience and knoweldge will have no bearing in application.  There are different perspectives of how to apply your buy-ins from your bank roll at the table.  That is where the confusion, the arguments, the frustration and the wrong applications are applied by each person, IMO.

Same with NFL Football.  Look at the Minnesota Vikings and how they played all year.  Almost perfect.  Could not be beat and then in the next to last game, they did the impossible comeback and series of historical plays.  Then in the next game to propel them to the Superbowl, they lost big and lost like an elementary girls volleyball team playing an NFL pro team.  It came down to one game and they sucked, they lost and lost like an amateur team would play without experience, but they have experience and talent.  Every excuse in the book was mentioned, but fact is, they lost and lost it all in a game of 60 minutes of play.  No different in gambling at baccarat. 

It is the same in all investments and businesses, no different.