http://www.freewebs.com/turbogenius/raindropscomments.htm (http://www.freewebs.com/turbogenius/raindropscomments.htm) << I don't understand our bets? I understand the analogy of raindrops, I get that. Can someone RE-WORD this? I'm sure it might be easier than I give it credit for.
THANKS, Ken
Hi Ken
I think what Ed is saying is if we overlap each dozen so that location one from dozen 1 equals location 13 and 25 from the other two dozen that would give us 12 unique locations instead of 36.
Now what are the odds that each dozens locations would fill in the same manner. So if dozen1 location 1 is due to hit ( sleeper ) what are the odds that dozen 2 location 1 and dozen 3 location 1 will also be sleepers.
So chart the sleepers for 37 spins. Which dozen has the most sleepers. Let's say dozen 1 has the most sleepers.
For the next 37 spins play the sleepers from dozen 1 and also play the opposite locations from dozen 2 and dozen 3 at the same time.
Example... sleepers are 1,6,7,9,10 ..... play these numbers and play the opposite locations from the other two dozens ... not the mirror locations. ... so play 14,15,16,17,20,23,24 from dozen 2 and play 26,27,28,29,32,35,36 from dozen 3.
Clear as mud if I do say so myself.
Hope this helps
B
Just an observation.................
Every graph I've ever seen than man post goes down and then way, way up. Why do none just go up?
It is interesting and food for thought. Hmmmmmmmmmm
Could food for thought be why I'm getting so fat??
Sam
Nah, it's probably the new SatisFries from Burger King .....
I am the Turbo tester. Simple to inventive to darn complex.
Sams right. He says $1500 in 37 spins...wnat about th minus 500?
When i was learning....he seemed cool. He now seems naive..
Im sure he bankrupt before he got better.
If you trust my word....this doesn't work.
I thought about this............
Say the most numbers in 37 spins came in the first dozen. Assume there were 6. Using the pattern that six produced, you would bet all 12 numbers in the first dozen, six in the second and six in the third. That's 24 numbers.
Is that the bet? If not, would someone 'splain it?
Sam
Sam
You would bet the six numbers in dozen 1 that are sleepers.
Also bet the six opposite numbers in dozen 2 and also dozen 3.
For sake of clarity...don't look at your dozens as 1 to 36 look at each dozen as 1 to 12.
These 12 numbers are the positions.
Position 1 in the first dozen is #1 this would equate to #13 and also #25.
Now say your sleepers were in dozen 1 postions 1,2,3,4,5,6
You would bet these 6 positions in dozen 1
You would also bet positions 7,8,9,10,11,12, in the other 2 dozens.
Again ... clear as mud
B
B
Thanks for that explanation. Now I will take Turner's word for it and leave it be..
Sam
Turbo, what a cat !
Some years ago he was to meet me at a roulette table ( for him nearby) at an Atlantic City casino. He was a no show.
Discussion about his no show might still be in the old GG archives.
El Braggado . Big Windbag.Big EGO .
Nathan Detroit
After 37 spins,
we have D2 with the most sleepers with 6.
14,17,19,20,22,23
D1, D3 opposite positions on the carpet to this are
1,3,4,6,9,12 and 25,27,28,30,33,36
5u on each. add 5 on a win
Play for 37 spins.
duisberg20130101_0209
7
13
16
13
5
10
32
24
25
2
27
29
27
3
30
35
0
12
34
21
16
12
31
18
33
10
26
36
24
25
2
27
27
1
13
15
5
18
35
35
8
2
26
23
9
33
28
32
16
29
8
20
26
12
35
18
22
6
1
32
20
1
20
32
3
21
19
12
4
25
27
12
18
9
Quote from: NathanDetroit on October 26, 2013, 07:44:50 PM
Turbo, what a cat !
Some years ago he was to meet me at a roulette table ( for him nearby) at an Atlantic City casino. He was a no show.
Discussion about his no show might still be in the old GG archives.
El Braggado . Big Windbag.Big EGO .
Nathan Detroit
of course...your personal experience is unfortunate, and formulated your said view.
Personally, as a rookie, I have Turbo to thank for my introduction and interest in Roulette.
He made me fascinated in the aspects of roulette I had never imagined.
As i have pointed out thought...it seems very misguided now as I re-read years later.
Reminds me of Aaron Nimzowitsch
he wrote "THE" iconic chess book "My System" written in the 30's
It inspired Kasparov, Karpov and many other GMs.
The book, mostly, is now is theoretically redundant
and the same numbers, played on RX with total honesty, using an EC idea I developed.
This is my difference in playing Turbo style and playing what i have learned.
You can't bang away with a set of the same numbers for 37 spins. You have to look at NOW
What a neat and clean graph ! :nod:
Tell us more... Come on, that looks as refreshing as a cold :beer: on a summer day !!
I will share in a separate post....let me test some more...but its plain to see from the graph its D'Alembert progression
This is MrJs post on Turbo
Sorry guys....I read my post again..and I looks like Im kinda bragging That I have some wonderful system.
That graph is genuine and played as if live.
My point was that there are methods here that are technically better and make more sense than the Turbo era.
Theories that he was unaware of
Turbo was/is a good buddy, I owe the guy. The ONE thing I have posted many times before and I still stick to it...... he created methods (some) that are not playable at an actual casino. Some are great in theory or have passed a test of 200K spins. Well, that does me no good.
Also, many numbers are required to bet along with FAST calculations.
Worse case >> you are playing at a table with one other person. That person lays their chips and BAM, its time to spin and no time to figure out what/how much to bet next. You have to stick to a method (imo) where you know in FOUR seconds, what/how much to bet next.
Ken
Quote from: Mr J on October 27, 2013, 05:00:59 PM
You have to stick to a method (imo) where you know in FOUR seconds, what/how much to bet next.
I have 2 plays. Online and real. I have to agree with you totally Ken.
I dropped repeat methods online a while ago. EC only.
me and the wife went to the casino yesterday and I played repeats on the marque. 50p chips.
Mostly 1 or 2 chips.....max 4. I can't think straight with everyone throwing chips around to be tracking and MM
I play flat bet. i add chips here and there with casino money. Very simple and basic. Very relaxing
spent a very enjoyable 3 hours in there. didn't miss a spin. as you say...knew what to play in 4 sec.
heres proof I was there lol
How is Turbo doing by the way??
I remember him from the older forums, very passionate guy with roulette systems.
But then he kinda disappeared....
Carlitos 8)
Carlitos,
Last hello by Turbo at another board was October 2, 2013.
ND
*****I can't think straight with everyone throwing chips around to be tracking and MM
**** quote by Turner.
Welcome to the trenches of the B & M casinos.
1.) Fat babes with oversized pocket books hitting your rib cage
2.) Babes slapping your back any time a hit occurs
3) spilled Red wine all across the layout ( Clumsy Fem next to me at Harrah`s in Las Vegas)
4)sitting at position 3 at a very busy table . Having Quad bet at 1/4. Some cat inadvertently moves bet with his sleeve . Now a splitbet 2/5 . What shows # 1.GRRR
5.) small stack of bets on a position knocked over by Fem`s pocketbook on left arm while placing her bets with the same arm.
6.) superfat babe taking up place between position 1 and 2.
7.) Dealer suggestion to remove small note pad and pen from table. Write on lap. GRRR
True experiences by ND
ND...no babes to speak of. Groups of desperate Asian and Chinese men losing thousands in minutes
That should be an in indication not to buy any system that was given by an "auld" Asian player on his death bed.
Those cats only play " for luck". They don`t know how to win. No wonder Mr. Sheldon Adelson the billionaire proprietor of the Sands LV Corp and Macau casino with 9,000 rooms is doing so well.
One of my Mutual Funds has shares invested in the Sands Corp.
HAPPY WINNINGS!!