The past couple of years and moving into the present, I have noticed without a doubt, the general Bac playing crowd is wagering predominantly for the CUT the highest majority of the times.
Or, they are wagering for the 1-2 or the 2-1 type of presentments. No matter what the shoe is actually presenting, how strong or what it has presented.
And I am referring to even strong streaks that form without any previous streaks in the shoe, just for example. I see fewer and fewer people capitalizing on anything along the lines of streaks, chop-chop, doubles, triples or anything of the likes.
They absolutely get clobbered, hands down, almost every time. Yes they win a little bit and then they just continue and continue.
I really do not understand it, as I have written about, prior to 2005(ish) the Bac tables would all have the highest majority of players wagering together in full camaraderie and really hurting the house quite often. I rarely see that any longer. I would have to say, it is a complete turnaround in the way the game is perceived and played these days.
Maybe it is the vast information out there, systems, tutors, YouTube scams/systems, etc., etc.? I do not know exactly but I have to believe that it is partly due to the internet and the instant everything available more so these days than prior to 2005(ish) and 2000.
Such a perfect example of do's and don'ts at the Bac table last nite.
Will post a couple pics later.
As I have written about many times.
Low ties produce an abundance of the hands clumping together and presenting whatever it has been, chop-chop, doubles, streaks, weak or strong, whatever. But somehow 0-1-2-3 ties will present just that.
Here is a shoe we hit is hard, real hard for the 15th hands or so.
F-7 on Hand 8. I have written extensively about the first F-7 coming in the first 10 hands, more often than not.
As well, my second established finding is a favored Hands 12-17 to produce a second or a first F-7. Here are the 2nd and 3rd F7s of the shoe on Hands 14 and 16. There were two additional F7s as well within this same shoe.
[attachimg=1]
Here is another shoe, classic Banker dominating. But I have to say, because so many believe just wager the Banker all the time. Player usually will not finish with such a deficit as this one. If you play/wager for the Banker, I have countless shoes that would wipe you out just as easy, shoe after shoe after shoe with Player side domination.
[attachimg=2]