Our members are dedicated to PASSION and PURPOSE without drama!

Which one will you prefer and why?

Started by Albalaha, April 05, 2021, 02:53:18 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Albalaha

I have a query for fellow members:
          Which one is better?

1. A method that always gets +1 in the long run and earns averagely in average sessions; or

2. A method that either wins 50 units minimum or loses 100 units maximum with 90% probability to finish with a win.
Email: earnsumit@gmail.com - Visit my blog: http://albalaha.lefora.com
Can mentor a real, regular and serious player

KungFuBac

Hi Albalaha

Trick Question

I will raise my hand first and shall select option: B


That is, without saying "it depends", or  "what is the players objective", or "mr professor please clarify long run", "clarify earns averagely in average sessions" ...etc.


So my final answer: B


Continued Success,

"There are many large numbers smaller than one."

Albalaha

Both are important for me but I focused always on method 1 as it was considered impossible by so called math geniuses. The premises behind their belief of casino games being unbeatable are the house edge and a silly belief that player will bet 1 unit or any fix/flat bet permanently.
     After somewhat accomplishing the first method, now I m focused on the other and very close to finishing it.
Email: earnsumit@gmail.com - Visit my blog: http://albalaha.lefora.com
Can mentor a real, regular and serious player