I realize my yesterday test was wrong. i was testing from last to first results, so i erase every thing and re-start.

Here are final results just betting hand after hand, no logic at all:

[attachimg=1]

We can see from the stats below, that our strike rate is a bit better than inspected by our invests.

Now i will start testing with some realistic settings... 



Stats:
Original Zumma 72 days at the tables; origin and authenticity is unknown;
it is however used as a base line for testing by many.

600 shoes, 41,698 decisions.

Streak Length = Occurrences = Percentage

1's = 10297 = 24.6% of all results
2's = 10296 = 24.6%
3's = 8232 = 19.7%
4's = 5148 = 12.3%
5's = 3220 = 7.7%
6's = 1932 = 4.6%
7's = 1127 = 2.7%
8's = 648 = 1.54%
9's = 360 = 0.86%
10 = 200  = 0.479%
11 = 110  = 0.264%
12 = 60
13 = 39
14 = 14
15 = 15

Hi All,

I finaly decide to build a tool to test this idea.
I have tested 32768 hands so far, the data is from Beat-the-wheel file posted in first page..
All test are made once stopping at 128, once at 256 and once at 512.
No Wingoal, no stoploss, no limited number of hands to play... just to see what is the best way to play it. I will try to tweak later with the above settings.

Here is what i got so far:

[attachimg=1]

At first look, i would go for the 512 big win, but as i said, this was simply playing hands after hands without any logic.

Will continu tomorrow the other half of the file... then i will chose the worst result and try to find a way to make it winning,

Cheers, Normy 

This was not tested as Denzie play for sure! 
The graph does not look like this at all... 
You should have only few BIG wins, not a lot of small wins.   

2 = 1000 so (x500)
10 = 5000 

@ppkkint,
Big EZ example is perfect.

result,bet,BR,comments
P 2p   -2
P 4p
P 8p
P 16p
P 32p
B 2b   -4
B 4b
B 8b
P 16b    -20 (invest 16u )
B 32b
B 64b
P 2p   -22
B 2b   -24
P 2p   -26
B 2b   -28
P 2p   -30
P 4p
P 8p
P 16p
P 32p
P 64p
P 128p
P 256p
P win   +482
===========================

About your second question, here is a example of starting at 4 units:

result,bet,BR,comments
B 2b   -2
B 4b
B 8b
B 16b
B 32b
P 2p   -4
P 4p
B 8p   -12 (invest 8u )
B 4b   -16 <<<---- Here, lost after invest but we don't invest twice in a row, so we got BB to start a new attack
B 8b
B 16b
B 32b
B 64b
B 128b
B 256b
B win   +496

Denzie will correct me if i'm wrong...

Not that easy!   
You see the drawing i posted, i have to turn it in 1 big equation... 

Sorry, coding a tracker for this would involve too much time.

Could this help you to track the game?

A simple tracker would not be very usefull as it can take many shoes (hours) before something apend. 

This was my only test and been very lucky i guess? 

A sheet? This only work with Steph bot...
But a bot is Thinkable ! to work 20h/day for sure) 

Will see...

Look at this. 

Was lucky, very fast! Made my day 

15 hands, +206, i stopped at 128 but next one also won, too bab for me   (chicken  )


I use Rx to track, Reb for Banker and Black for Player.

Cheers

Yep! you are right about the (2x256)-invest,
but if you were playing for 256, you would have lost the first attack on the left.   

Look solid method antways!   

Just had a look at the Bac. table when i finidhed my roulette seesion,
and i see a BIG win right there.

2 units to start + a 32 invest, would have win 256 units.   

Tks 

Hi Denzies,

1 more question please:

Supposing we are playing this method with a bot,

After a win at 256, do we reset with Last outcome or Opposite of Last outcome?

Or we go virtual 1,1 for 1 hand, and then restart with the loser?

Tks, nOrMy