All possible patterns derive from a math expectation where card rank positions will make a role in determining the most likely final outcome.
Different ranks help or not a side:
1/3 rank card positions are 9/13 favored to get the B side to win;
2/4 rank card positions are 8/4 favored to get the P side to win;
5 rank card position is 1/1 (even money) to get any side to win;
6 rank card position is 1/1 (even money) to get any side to win.
You must consider such values in order to build valuable algorithms by approximating the key cards falling here or there by more likely ranges.
So itlr you can't expect to win Player bets whether the first or third card isn't a 6,7,8 or 9 (1.45:1 against) but you are 2:1 favorite if while betting the same Player side the second or fourth card is an A,2,3,4 or 10.
If the hand needs one or two third cards (5 or 6) the hand will go even money.
Some random walks are more capable to grasp the "more likely card distribution" considered by certain patterns, especially by exploiting the natural 'clustering effect'.
And that's a huge edge we could rely upon.
"Incidents", that is hands not following a math propensity, are surely happening but they should be considered just as a kind of systematic error not influencing our long term results.
See you next week
as.
Different ranks help or not a side:
1/3 rank card positions are 9/13 favored to get the B side to win;
2/4 rank card positions are 8/4 favored to get the P side to win;
5 rank card position is 1/1 (even money) to get any side to win;
6 rank card position is 1/1 (even money) to get any side to win.
You must consider such values in order to build valuable algorithms by approximating the key cards falling here or there by more likely ranges.
So itlr you can't expect to win Player bets whether the first or third card isn't a 6,7,8 or 9 (1.45:1 against) but you are 2:1 favorite if while betting the same Player side the second or fourth card is an A,2,3,4 or 10.
If the hand needs one or two third cards (5 or 6) the hand will go even money.
Some random walks are more capable to grasp the "more likely card distribution" considered by certain patterns, especially by exploiting the natural 'clustering effect'.
And that's a huge edge we could rely upon.
"Incidents", that is hands not following a math propensity, are surely happening but they should be considered just as a kind of systematic error not influencing our long term results.
See you next week
as.