Blue Angel....


Would the cycle of bets that you are using here for roulette (37) be different if this was american wheel, would it then be cycle of 38? And what if this is applied to baccarat, what's the cycle number then?

Still......

Not sure what march you were trying to play, but this is how it looks with march 2. And a 121212 pattern will not make you lose with march 1


P  1
B 1 
P  1  x 
B 1  x
P   
P   
P   
P  3   
B 1
P  1  w
B    x
B 2  w
P  1
B    w
B   
B 3
P   
P     x
P     x
P  3   
B 1
P     w
P  2  w
B   
B    x   
B    w   
B   
B 3   
P  1
B 1  w   
P     x   
P  2  w
B 1 
P     w
P  2  w 
B 1 
P  1  w
B    x   
B    w   
B 3   
P   
P  2  x
B 1  w
P  1  w
B    x   
B    w   
B   
B   
B   
B   
B 3   
P  1   
B    w     
B 2  w   
P   
P     x
P     w
P  3   
B   
B 2  x   
P  1  w
B    w   
B 2  w   
P  1
B   w
B   w   
B   
B   
B 3   
P   
P    x 
P    x
P  3   
B 1
P    w 
P  2 w
B 1 
P    w


ending +9

Quote from: Gambler on February 23, 2016, 02:28:32 AM
In my opinion this is not the correct way to play. You are ideally betting against the singles/chops, which doesn't sound good as they sshow up often and this way of betting will be no good.

Having said that this method worked for this shoe, but most of the times it will take you nowhere.

Gambler,

The example above is how march 2 is played.  If the shoe/session is a lot of chops you will be watching it and not placing bets (most of the time). March 2 fails if there are back to back repeats of the dozens. If you play march 1 then you get all the chops and the only thing that will make you lose will be 3 unique dozens in a row.

So you pick your own way to approach the shoe, if one of the marches is producing a negative result the other one will be producing a positive one.   This is just my observation

Quote from: Atlantis on February 22, 2016, 04:24:05 PM
Just out of interest here is BigEZ result using the Sputnik Second March way:

P
B
P
P
B
P w+1
P L-1
P L-1
P
P
P
P
B
P w+1
P L-1
P L-1
P
P
B
B L-1
B w+1
P
B w+1
B L-1
P L-1
P L-1
B w+1
P w+1
P L-1
B w+1
P w+1
B w+1
B L-1
B L-1
P
B w+1
B L-1
P L-1
B w+1
B L-1
B L-1
P
P L-1

11 won
16 lost
-5 flat.

A.

This is how the 2nd march should look like using the rules that Sputnik has posted. Here are the rules also just to be clear....



Secound march:
Lets say you see dozen 1 then you play dozen 2 and 3
Lets say you see dozen 2 then you play dozen 1 and 3
Lets say you see dozen 3 then you play dozen 1 and 2
Until two two loses, then you wait for a fictive win and start over.


p 1
b 1
p   x  -1
p 2 w   0
b 1
p   w   1
p   w   2
p
p
p
p
p 3
b 1
p   w   3
p   w   4
p
p
p 3
b
b   x   3
b 3 x   2, now wait for Virtual Win
p 1
b   w      trigger start again
b 2 w   3
p
p 2 x   2
b 1 x   1   now wait for Virtual Win
p   w      trigger start again
p 2 w   2
b 1
p 1 w   3
b   x   2
b   w   3
b 3
p 1
b   w   4
b 2 w   5
p 1
b   w   6
b   w   7
b 3
p
p   x   6

Atlantis....

Is this how this shoe is played with BTW way

p
b
p w
p x
b
p
p x
p
p
p
p
p
b
p
p x
p
p
p
b
b
b
p
b x
b x
p
p
b
p x
p x
b
p
b w
b x
b
p
b
b x
p
b
b x
b
p
p

It seems as if BEAT THE WHEEL has deleted his last post with the idea you are looking for ATLANTIS. Wonder why 

Any new update or video  about the march you try and use against Vankeelen test.

betjack....

this is not a bad sequence you have posted

XoXXooXo

it comes to +1 flat betting

1   X
2   O
3   X  w
4   X  x
5   X
6   ?      no bet here
   
if this is the start to a new game....
1   X
2   X
3   O
4   X  x
5   X  x
6   X  x
7   ?      no bet here
   
if this is the start to a new game....
1   X
2   X
3   X
4   O
5   X
6   X
7   X
8   ?   no bet here
   

if this is the start to a new game....
1   X
2   O
3   O  x
4   X
5   X x
6   X x
7   ?      no bet here


if this is the start to a new game.... 
1   X
2   X
3   O
4   O  w
5   X
6   X  w
7   X
8   ?        no bet here


if this is the start to a new game.... 
1   X
2   X
3   X
4   O
5   O  w
6   X
7   X  w
8   X
9   ?         no bet here

 
1   X
2   O
3   O  x
4   O
5   X
6   X  x
7   X  w
8   ?        no bet here
 
if this is the start to a new game....
1   X
2   X
3   O
4   O w
5   O
6   X
7   X  w
8   X
9   ?          no bet here
   

if this is the start to a new game....
1   X
2   X
3   X
4   O
5   O  w
6   O
7   X
8   X   w
9   X
10   ?            no bet here

I just ran across the same example that was posted above and I got the same exact thing except in 3 different places, marked below in BLUE

Could you please check to see if either one of us has made a mistake

B
P
B w
B x
B
P
B w
B x
P x
P x
P x
B
B w
B
B
B
P
P w
B
B w
P
P w
B
P x
P x
B w
B x
B x
P
B x
P w
B w
P w
P x
B x/
P w/
P x
B w/
B x
B x
B
P
B x
B x
P x
P x
P x
B
P x
P x
P w
P
B
P w
P x
B x
B x
P w
P x
B w
B x
B x
B
B
P
P w
B
P x
B w

Quote from: Sputnik on February 08, 2016, 07:10:54 AM
I did not reply yesterday as it was my Birsthday and i had a party.
Will get back with explination later today.

Cheers

Happy Birthday buddy 

P
P
B
P x
B w
P w
P x
P x
P
P
P
P
P
B
B x
P x
B x
B x
B x
P
B w
B x
B w
B
B
B
P
P x
P w
P
P
P
B
P w
P x
P w
P
P
P
B
B x
P x
B x
P w
B w
B x
B x
P
P x
P w
B
B x
P x
P w
P
B
P x
P x
P w
P
P
P
P
B

Not even in the bathrooms? 

I would like the link also please

Quote from: tdx on December 09, 2015, 11:37:25 PM
If Im reading this right, the lets say you have

L  -1
L  -1
W +1
L  -1
L  -1
L  -1
W  +1   Net loss of -3

Now start betting 4 units a hand ( Deficit of 3 + 1 )

Next series

W  +4 here you are +1 reset to new 7 series

L    -1
L   -1
L    -1
W +1
L  -1
L  -1 
L  -  1   net loss 5, bet 6

L  -6
W  + 6
W  + 6 reset


L  -1
L  -1
L  -1   
[/size]
Wins and losses as described above unfortunately happen all the time in baccarat.



[/size]

I started to fix you W/L string where I started in BLUE and then just continued it out.  There was not enough W/L left to finish but as it stands at the current 3L in arow you are at -1 overall