Sounds interesting

When 98% of my 1k placed bet graphs look like this it makes me [smiley]aes/joking.png[/smiley]

I know the characteristics of my bet very well, and I also don't have any big draw down or very long losing streaks

Yes that is the test I refer to

Would you consider  being able to pass The Van Keelen Test to be a definitive example of having an edge ?

What if you can't reach 550/1000 each time but you are above 500 each time? Would you consider that an example of having an edge ?

Not one method/system has a better chance of getting to +1 from start then any other? That really is interesting

Ok, thanks for your input. Sorry to hear about 12 losses in a row. I can't even begin to imagine what that feels like

WBK.....
You think about what I am asking. I am not asking if there is a fairy tale way to beat the game every shoe flat betting.  I am asking if at some point there in the shoe you will be up 1 unit. It could be the first bet and then you lose every bet after that, it doesn't make a difference. 

I am asking if a method can guarantee REACHING (not ending) 1 unit profit anywhere in a shoe? There is a difference.

Not looking to grind out anything.

Just asking, is there any method/strategy out there where you can guarantee AT SOME POINT in the shoe you will be up +1 unit. It does not matter if the shoe ends negative

Do you, or anyone else for that matter, think there is a bet selection where you can get to +1 unit in a shoe without a doubt, by flat betting?

Meaning at some point in a shoe you will be +1 unit guaranteed, you could be negative at the end of the shoe all the time that does not matter.

Im interested to hear responses to this

Let me ask these questions and see where this takes us....

Does variance really matter?

For example. Lets say your current way of playing, you think it is impossible through all your testing that you can't lose 10/15/20 times in a row.

Now, is that not controlling your variance? 

If that is not controlling your variance how is that any different from saying someone can control their variance by only seeing 3/4 losses in a row max?

Does the longer you go without a win make a difference if you know its coming before a certain point?

Would you care to explain how that's achieved

I was talking about the edge you say you get at the game.....not the experience

Xander.....


I would like to hear your views on bacc

I would like to see a progression for the even chances Mr Albalaha or at least a hint or clue to point us in the right direction. Were not dogs, you don't have to rub our nose in it

 BBPBP BPPPP BPPBP PPPPP

  BPPBP PPBPB BBPBB BPBPB

  PBBPP BBPPB BPBPP PPPBP

  BPBPP PPPBP 

x
  x
   x
  x
   w
   x
     w
     w
    w
  x
     w
  x
     w
   x
    x
      w
      w
     w
     w
    w
    w
    w
   x
    x
    w
     w
 


not a bad shoe