+ Register

[Bally6354]

Thanks Ralph

I see what you are saying. You certainly get your money's worth with the spins you crunch through! 

[Ralph]

Started a short session showing you can win,if the lucky numbers come out.

[Ralph]

Sometimes it is harder, but can still be manageable. This is the continue of the session. Done minutes ago.

[Ralph]

You never know when you got a bad streak, which can take all previous winning. Stop/loss is a difficult issue, I got max up to 19 units here, everthing OK so far. With a stop/loss at 18, I would have have a loss.  Current is about a unit a spin, which is very good.
Negative progressions produce as long it works, A few spins can ruin all.


This is in the range of the randomness control, but I do not suspect Bv for cheating, they will one day take me they know it and do not bother reading my play.

[Bally6354]

This is in the range of the randomness control, but I do not suspect Bv for cheating, they will one day take me they know it and do not bother reading my play.

I agree that BV do not cheat. They don't need to!

Good luck Ralph and keep winning! 

[Ralph]

Still about one plus a spin, but the bet has been up to 25, which is in the higher acceptable part. I do not belive in HAR, but you are free to stop when you "smell" it is time to try something else for a while.

[Bayes]

I know precious little about this SHA thing that Bet Voyager claims proves their numbers are random.  Could anyone explain it?  How do we know, like I know I have two hands, that this thing is totally up front?  Can it be manipulated?

Sam, I wrote a long post on the other forum about BV's randomness control:

http://www.rouletteforum.cc/index.php?topic=4030.0

Superman is right, there is no way that BV can cheat you by manipulating the SHA algorithm.

[Albalaha]

Bayes,   
           Are you sure that bv can't manipulate with results? I trust your knowledge and wisdom can rely upon them blindly.

[TwoCatSam]

Thank you, Bayes.  I read the entire post.