+ Register

[VLS]

I have to give 2 news, one good and one bad
Let's start with the bad: There is no system that always win
On with the good: Despite this you can win at roulette.


There are no foolproof systems, ie earning 100% of the times they are executed, many systems exist which earn more TIMES than they lose.


Why then do people lose?
Recall that there are no foolproof systems.


System players lose for 2 reasons:
A) They lose for using plain bad systems, losing "systematically" because they are based on false premises which violate all "business logic". It is easy to detect a bad system, just see if the behavior proposed by the system corresponds to what would an entrepreneur do. Example: no good businessman would buy an item that did not sell, and certainly never would he buy more quantity the less the item is being sold. Now watch systems out there, and then tell me. What is a growing progression but an investment on what is not selling? It is true that we have to have a degree of perseverance, but not so disproportionate to keep buying more black balloons, those that no one asks us about.


We can not base all our business success plans in the hopes tomorrow an epidemic of taste on black balloons will unleash, more so when other stable businesses succeed selling balloons of other colors.


B) They lose for when they possess relatively good systems, they do not have the endurance to use them consistently, or patience and tranquility through adverse times, which there inevitably will be.


Theory of Manrique's Relativity of systems


The theory is: the same actions lead to different results when the circumstances are different.


And at roulette everything is always different, no two sessions are the same.


Therefore the bonanza of a system depends on the sample being tested but can not be conclusive about future behavior being identical.


Since there is no system that wins 100% of the time it is practiced, we find that to be a winner, we must win by balances. WHEN and HOW these balances are produced is no more and no less what makes lose the system player.


For systems that lose, it's pretty easy to see: for it is impossible they always win, and at times they lose ergo we can never know how and when they lose (if we could know then it could help us avoid losses which would be infallible).


How can we win?


Through impeccable conduct, professionalism and mastery of a SET of techniques, tactics and strategies, better yet grounded in solid theoretical foundations.


We must use the systems just as the best way or perhaps the least bad way of trying to exploit the dynamics of balance and imbalance in the game, and we will not only study the dynamics for the numbers coming out but for the results they produce.


We must try to limit the dispersion in a small segment, which in turn limits our results, and then we use events to multiply these segments which are the most confined we can, by having a large number of micro-banks to reach valuable percentages in the balances, as in Guerrilla Warfare, attack as often as we can and as our attacks are positive it will increase our overall strength, but at the slightest misstep, we shy away at all costs leaving quickly risking the less from the advantage that we have.

[Bally6354]

And at roulette everything is always different, no two sessions are the same.

It is true that the stream of numbers are always changing.

Therefore sticking with the same system will not produce consistent results.

We can all see this when graphs are posted up of spectacular highs and lows.

So it does not pay to walk into a casino with a preconcieved plan of action. We don't know what the 'weather' is going to be like yet and it could be one of those days where our plan is going to sink without trace.

Now that's not necessarily bad news because that means that there is going to be a consistency in the results. (The bad news will be if we continue to fight against whatever it is that is happening) I think human nature dictates that we like to be proven right. Unfortunately that can cost money in a gambling environment.

An open minded approach is required to be able to adapt to whatever is happening presently and to be prepared to change tack and go with the flow.

There is no worse feeling than walking out of a casino feeling like a stubborn old fool.

System players have lost for hundreds of years. Things are not about to change anytime soon.

cheers.

[Sputnik]

Nice topic ...

[FLAT_IN_O]

Everything you said Vic stays.It is exactly how I behave while playing,and also trying to explain to
ppl./but haven't way to do so with words/how to beat the game mostly.The only problem I see here,
only few are really playing real live/all online/and everyone prefer doing it from his home sofa,preferably
with bot,but not probably aware they are throwing their money away thatway,as you can not win there.As if you do few times you are ban...so what's the point playing there.
It beats me how did internet prostituded this game of roulette into ww cheating bussines,and how
naive and stupid are ppl.playing there.