+ Register

[esoito]

I would as it's only $17 but it would be better if an experienced player did the testing and reporting for us.

http://www.online-casino-info.com/carries-perfect-baccarat-system/

[Albalaha]

It seems to be a bad joke.

[Teorulte]

I'd buy it but what's the point?  Fails long term I am sure.  I bet it wouldn't even beat Zumma.

[esoito]

I'm not saying you're wrong.

But as the site gives no indication of the method/MM then the words 'bad joke' and 'fails long term' would need to be tested first to prove or disprove those suppositions.

That's the whole point of testing...

I repeat -- you could well be right, but only testing will reveal if you are.

[TwoCatSam]

esoito

If she sends it to me free, I'll have a look at it but I'll not pay for anything more.

Her ideas are so poorly presented one cannot understand what she's saying.  Well, I can't anyway.  I would not even ask Nick to try to write a sheet for it because I like the guy.

When you say, "look at the last two or three", you've lost me.  Which is it?  Two or three?

I have the feeling these systems of hers are so difficult to understand, no one can truly test them.  But I could be wrong...

Sam

[ADulay]

I would as it's only $17 but it would be better if an experienced player did the testing and reporting for us.

http://www.online-casino-info.com/carries-perfect-baccarat-system/

Wow!  What an amazing video demonstration!!  11 straight wagers on Bank.  What a system!!  (Do we have a sarcasm font?)

I'd also like to hear her "explanation" of this statement:

I've found that beating baccarat is best accomplished with a group of 4 players. This is only single player system I know  of that makes a profit long-term.
Four players?  Very interesting but totally unsubstantiated.

With that said,  I'll invest $3.00 and Paypal it to anyone who decides to actually purchase this puppy.  Hey, 6 guys at 3 bucks a piece.  It should be a simple matter to understand whatever it is causes her to push Banker past a pair of Players.  There are several system plays that I'm aware of that will do that so perhaps she's just collected a few and pieced it together.

Either that or she's literally just betting Bank with a small Marty.

Either way, I'm in for $3.00US via Paypal.

AD

[esoito]

The lady was less than enthusiastic about this being reviewed.

In her email to me she states:
It seems people would rather openly talk behind my back, than discuss things with me, or actually test it first rather than openly speculate, then they'd actually have some value to share. So it makes me the think the real motive is something else. Truly, it doesn't matter the explanation because I will still continue to think what I think

Either way, I'm done with the discussions and have some family issues that have come up that I need to focus on. So I'd just rather move on altogether. I like to keep peace. In the end I think it's all petty and it's a blessing when one has peace in their life.

So it looks like we can forget about her co-operation.

She mentions 'real motive'. The only 'real motive,' as we all know, is to review something released into in the public arena to assess whether or not the claims made are true or not.

Standard practice with gambling products. She seems to have difficulty accepting that!

In fact, it's probably best we forget about the product altogether.

Yes? No?

[Albalaha]

False claims have sadly become the core of "gambling system" and when you buy the "system" you will find it works in a particular favorable condition only while it will either lose proportionally or higher than it can win in adverse cases . Same thing is true about hundreds of so-called "systems" posted in forums like this. Nobody answers as to why his "system" is better than playing anything randomly.




P.S.: I am an exception. 

[malcop]

I thought something seemed familiar about all this, do any of you guys remember we had a similar discussion about a system called the "The Pattern Zero Roulette System" by a lady from India.

Here is the link: http://www.online-casino-info.com/pattern-roulette-system/

Notice both sites look pretty much the same don't you think?

As soon as I saw the site alarm bells started ringing 

Same person just a different scam, stop wasting your time....

Thanks


malcop

[esoito]

That's right, Malcop. Same person.

In fact, Sam has already reviewed the roulette-pattern thing and was less than enthusiastic, putting it mildly.

This particular baccarat thing was presented as 'perfect' !!!!!

Whooo...an extraordinarily long bow to draw and a VERY bold claim that begged to be tested...

In fact, it's so perfect it's being flogged for $17. Ha.

Tell you what -- if I had a 'perfect' system I'd be using it all the time and not bother flogging it at all.

Nor would I bother with running a site that's an obvious honey-trap because it's loaded with affiliate casino links. And that's a test of character --here's someone willing to profit from the losses and misfortunes of others.


Oh well. It takes all sorts, hmmm?

[ADulay]

Darn it.

I was so ready to chuck my current baccarat play and jump on the "Super 17" system.  (I just made that up.)

Oh well, moving on.

AD