Another B&M Board:
[attachimg=1]
3 F-7s:
Hand 12
Hand 39
Hand 61
After the 10 Players streak not a double Banker for some time. Almost everyone wagering heavy for that second Banker with all of the too often thought of, "it has to come out", being said out loud.
I got the picture of this at hand 74 and of the next seven hands out there were six more Naturals. Making the last eighteen hands having 14 Naturals as one of the ties was a natural eight versus a natural eight.
Hi Alrelax
Excellent P shoe. Thanks (as always) for taking the time to post these.
I think most of us would have caught 6-8 of that 10iar P run. However, in my efforts to catch another smaller P run immediately afterward I may have missed most or at least the first 3-4 of that 8iar single B1 streak that promptly showed next. re: the 8iar B1 streak---that's the kind of run that tends to slip up on us, as i sometimes look back in hindsight and wonder how I didn't see that (usually because i was overly focused on NOT that).
Great shoe.
As my great uncle Confucius once said: "When in doubt just keep riding the horse in the direction its headed."
Continued Success To All,
I remember to this day from the Atlantic City days I had back in the late 80's and the 90s there was this one guy that would sit there and bet table Max of $10,000 on two wagers and one of them was after there was a streak of seven or eight of more on one side, then cut he would bet the very next one on the same side that the streak was, like my example shows.
Example, say there was a streak of 10 players and then it fell off to the bank, his table Max wager would be back on the player for the following hand. More so with the players than the bankers because some reason right after Banker streaks so many times the player tries to catch up a bit.
And I remember that to this very day and most of the time and I mean the highest majority of the time after streak, it is that way like I said especially with the player side.
[attachimg=1]
Hi Alrelax/thx for responding to my thoughts on immediate aftermath of a Long-Side Streak to anticipate that recent side run to start up again.
Alrelax:
"...I remember to this day from the Atlantic City days I had back in the late 80's and the 90s there was this one guy that would sit there and bet table Max of $10,000 on two wagers and one of them was after there was a streak of seven or eight of more on one side, then cut he would bet the very next one on the same side that the streak was, like my example shows.
Example, say there was a streak of 10 players and then it fell off to the bank, his table Max wager would be back on the player for the following hand. More so with the players than the bankers because some reason right after Banker streaks so many times the player tries to catch up a bit...."
In all likelihood I may have inserted that into my arsenal a couple years back because I did indeed read it first from one of your older posts. However, I typically implement that logic for both sides' streak. I may decide to rethink that a little.
I think of that stage as "wagering on the turn" and more difficult(at least for me). In the aforementioned P10iar P streak I would have likely set aside my pressed up wager around the 7th hit, reduced to 1.0 Base Unit til the end. So with my pressed-up and set aside wager preparing to be sent out I would have been extra cautious on the next hand after the P-Streak ending B1. Sometimes I will wait one more hand to try and decipher additional intel. Sometimes I will check to see if that B1 hand had a change in card count(e.g., 4 to 5 or 5 to 4,..etc) from the immediately preceding two hands, and try to glean something from how that would change the very next hands' card order.
Thx again,