Guys
A video will soon be posted to this thread. While it is long, it would be to your benefit to watch it. Attached here is the log sheet of all the runs I've done in the past week or so. There are 87 of them. There were more, but I went nuts and went to a .50 bet and did not have enough bankroll to cover my loses!! So I started over at $104 and am now close to $150.
In the 87 trot study, five times the D'Alembert went to level 5. From there it won.
There were 87 trots; 27 lost and 60 won. That means that I won more than twice as often as I lost.
Who you gonna call................??
Sam
EDIT: I missed and "L" so it's 28/59. Who hoo!! Also, the orange marks new highs.
Very nice Sam. Looking forward for the video.
SLC Bot (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bdqaAi8m3pg#)
I love Sam videos! :thumbsup:
I find the Sam videos helpful, they have taken me away from my porn addiction!
thanks
People
Here is a recent shot, although I am at around 170 now. I started at 104, so I'm up almost 70 dollars which is 700 dimes/units. I'm too lazy to do the study, but I'm sure the win rate is somewhere around 70%. Not bad. If this holds up, I'll be quite the happy geezer!!
Sam
Sam, great job on the videos and testing. Quick question..... it appears you are checking the last 5 on whether to switch for the next 5. The original version, I believe, was to go back 9 using the last 5. Am I correct here?
Thanks, WG
Yes, you are Mr. G.........
Normy put in a feature where you can change the cycle and count. His testing showed 4/5 was better and it really is.
Sam
OK, great. Thanks Samster.....
Dear Sam,
You explain my framework for this kind of attack so much better than me,
i thank you so much for this! :cheer:
As you said. a back-count (don't know if it's a word ??? ) of last 5 spins W/L every 4 spins,
is the best i have found so far, but still some more testing to do... (as soon as i have time).
I seaw that bot comming back from a 11 loses in a row,,, with a setting of -100.
I can't have a better tester team than Sam and his 2 cats, 3 for the price of 1! >:D >:D >:D
br, normy
Normy
Thanks for those kind words. This has been a treat for me to test and explore. It gets me up at 3 a.m. to check and re-set it.
I'm hoping to have $100 profit by the end of October. That's betting mostly dimes, but later on, .20 per bet.
Sam
HOOOOOOOOOOBOY.................
You talk about the RFH....I got it.
Lost back to 104. Yuck.
The zero "came after me" with a vengeance! Had I been playing RNG, I would have sworn they did it on purpose.
Starting the climb out again.
I should have quit when I saw things going bad. I laid off 24 hours and things are back to normal.
Sam
"I should have quit when I saw things going bad. "
I'll bet that if you received $1 every time you've ever thought that, you would now be as rich as Croesus. :nod:
True, Esoito, but there was a time when I would not quit as long as I had a dollar to bet.
Those days are over.
I left plenty to fight again.
Sam, How's this one going..? Gone a bit quiet..?
Cat
The system and the bot are working properly; Sam is not.
When something is working very well---and this is---I tend to forget the Run From Hell is just around the corner. Overcoming the run from hell is simple---just play normally. The only problem is---one needs a proper bankroll.
I started at $104 and went up to $170. I then upped my bet to .50 from .10. I hit the RFH and went back to $104. I started back at .10 and went up to around $120. I had had such a phenomenal run, I upped the bet to .20. One would think that would be OK. It wasn't. I again hit the RFH and went down to $68. I also made some mistakes.
I am running Virtual box on this computer. One cannot use the mouse when the SL Bot needs it. I did. It caused the SL Bot to place a bet in the wrong place. I lost and chased that loss. I stopped at one chase!! Still wrong thing to do. That cost me $10 and that takes a long time to earn back.
Also the zero is a factor. They come in flocks like pigeons on Smart Live. If I had the bankroll, I'd sure play "Green on the Screen" as I nearly always see two at a time in ten spins. Sometimes three.
So now I take a line from COOL HAND LUKE. "You got to get your mind right." So I'm back to .10 and I have promised myself this is only a test and I will not raise the bet until I hit $200.
Sam
Just to show now nuts-o I can go...........I have no memory of doing this. I never go down more than 10 on the bot. How this went down 100 is beyond me.
Sam,
In my opinion, the bot lost the casino window for a while!?! or your PC went crazy?
May some popup windows hiding casino?
There is only 3 numbers in the log file for 35 spins! 5, 29 and 32, impossible!
br, Normy
Gadzooks!! I never even noticed the numbers at the left. At least I'm happy I didn't do it. I was thinking.........too much rum, Sam!!
People
Below you will find two attachments. You will see that for this trot my win/loss ratio was 26/18. That's actually 27/18 as the last win is not counted in the 45 spin total. That is a 60% win ratio. Ah, you say, this is just luck. This has been going on for around two weeks. I have hundreds of these.
If you look at the spin breakdown, you will see there are only three Ls in a row. There are very rarely 5 in a row. Almost every trot has more winners than losers. Can you imagine what this can do with a D'Alembert? Or a split Martingale?
There is a part of me that wishes I had had a hand in the creation of this jewel, but, alas!--it's all Normy!
Gadzooks, guys and dolls, this could easily be deciphered and played in a B&M casino. Just go to EC Cycling by Normy and figure it out.
Comments??
Sam
The absolute RFH..............
This started off very well and then went straight down. 5 losers in a row twice. Cannot overcome that!!
I post this to show that not all trots are winners; many are quite bad.
Sam
Well, after much futzing around and making of mistakes I am back to 104-----exactly where I started from when I began this test two weeks ago. That's not progress!! But I went down to $68 so that's a pretty good recovery.
I made a few mistakes learning the bot and I just made some stupid calls. I'm back on track now.
Sam
Sam
I'm 58 yrs old and from Canada ( near Montreal ) ... and I honestly thought my generation and area were the only ones to use the term FUTZING around. Man I have'nt used that term in a LONG time.
Nice [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]
B
Sam, well done, keep up the good work.
Sam.....
The RFH cost you only 11 units!!!! that's not bad at all
Now can you please stop FUTZING around and test this thing properly [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]
OK, guys........no more futzing.....
I'll be as careful as a coffee drinker using a table saw..
Sam
Quote from: Big EZ on November 04, 2013, 08:55:05 PM
Now can you please stop FUTZING around and test this thing properly [smiley]aes/beer.png[/smiley]
I learned a new word today :-*
Sam,
What about playing around 10 spins virtualy, (Track only mode),
if in minus, restart tracking few spins later,
but if your are up by say 4 units, set your stop loss to -10 as usual,
but add those 4 units and set stop loss to -6.
This will make your losing sessions cost less,
but will also decrease the number of winning sessions,
so, i don't know if it worth to be tried, it was just an idea! ???
br, Normy
Normy
Tried that. The stop loss will go no lower than -10. Frankly I wish it would go into the positive as I have an idea much like yours.
I would like to be able to calculate a 10 unit loss no matter where DD is. If DD were 40, my Stop Loss would be +30. That is to say, it will drop no lower than 10. As it is, if you were at forty, it would drop a total of 50.
Just an idea...
Sam
I'll send you this version in 10 minutes...
br, normy
... done.
Gang
As promised Normy sent me the improved bot. I immediately futzed up!! Geez............
When I win a session, this is a great thing to do. I'm on a roll, so I keep on rollin'. Works great..
Not so when I lost. I found out that doesn't work at all. Places way too large a bet.
So I lost ten bucks...........AGAIN!!
Live and learn.
It's a great idea; thanks Normy. I will stick with this plan for ages, I can promise.
Sam
I have not totally abandoned this test; I have change the parameters and continue to test.
Later
Sam