Holy Grail of Gambling: Essentials

Started by Albalaha, February 23, 2021, 05:04:06 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

KungFuBac

Thx Albalaha. I appreciate your various threads/sharing of research.


It seems much of your earlier research(e.g., >=3 years ago) focused more on Roulette et al EC games vs the recent attention to Bac(just my perception).

Q1: Do you indeed mostly focus on Bac?
Q2: Was it the lower H.E. vs say Roulette et al? or the overall outcomes profile for Bac that seemed a better fit for your research?  Other?
Q3: In earlier years did u also pursue other EC games while hunting for the HG?


I frequently see/hear statements from players referencing Bac b/p  in comparison with Craps Dp/Pl. I recognize that both sets
of outcomes are considered similar re: H.E. However, in the example of craps i do NOT see a comparable profile for PL vs DP re: overall outcomes profile as well as streaks. Though Bac B vs P very similar, IMO.


Thx in advance for your answers/addendum thoughts.

Happy Pi Day To All,

3/14/21

"There are many large numbers smaller than one."

Albalaha

Q1: Do you indeed mostly focus on Bac?
Answer: My main focus is on EC betting and how to handle variance and HE together.
Q2: Was it the lower H.E. vs say Roulette et al? or the overall outcomes profile for Bac that seemed a better fit for your research?  Other?
Answer: Baccarat is faster than roulette and offers lesser house edge is preferable. I do prefer to bet Player than Banker.
Q3: In earlier years did u also pursue other EC games while hunting for the HG?[/quote]
Answer: I did try many things from sports to stock and a few other games with EC type betting. Actually being an EC bet is not a prerequisite but the payout should be fixed one. I can configure my strategy for playing a single number of roulette as well.
Email: earnsumit@gmail.com - Visit my blog: http://albalaha.lefora.com
Can mentor a real, regular and serious player

KungFuBac

Thx Albalaha
Appreciate you always promptly responding /answering my questions as best possible. I know at times they may be generic in nature, already addressed in old posts...etc/ you could easily just respond with a "well it depends" reply. Many Thanks.

You have several new ideas (or maybe just new and improved), that have inspired me to dust off some old wagering regimes.


?1)Since your preference is to wager P in Bac--Do you try to wager in shoe sections that may have a tendency to indeed provide optimum opportunities for a P win?

?2) Do you have a predetermined # of wagers per shoe that you will attempt (Wins and or L), and abandon the shoe because you lost X# of initial wagers( Or won X# of initial wagers)?
     For Example: Lets say you won your first 12 wagers on P and P is also now ahead by 12. Obviously, if we had to make a one time wager I think the majority of us would guess the final tally is more likely to have a difference of 2 vs 22.
??Or do you would you just view as its all random /one big shoe and continue playing that shoe wagering on P to continue its domination?

Thank you,





"There are many large numbers smaller than one."

Albalaha

?1)Since your preference is to wager P in Bac--Do you try to wager in shoe sections that may have a tendency to indeed provide optimum opportunities for a P win?
Ans: I wager P for the sake of convenience of calculating net losses and wins. It is as random as B and one can choose either of them or any EC bet for that matter.

?2) Do you have a predetermined # of wagers per shoe that you will attempt (Wins and or L), and abandon the shoe because you lost X# of initial wagers( Or won X# of initial wagers)?

Ans: Shoe or deck or any block of attempts do not matter. Every bet is independent and can be tried.

     For Example: Lets say you won your first 12 wagers on P and P is also now ahead by 12. Obviously, if we had to make a one time wager I think the majority of us would guess the final tally is more likely to have a difference of 2 vs 22.
??Or do you would you just view as its all random /one big shoe and continue playing that shoe wagering on P to continue its domination?

Ans: I already answered it. Do not try to predict in a random game by seeing earlier results as they are totally unrelated.

Come out of fallacies as they only help casinos and keep you confused eternally.
Email: earnsumit@gmail.com - Visit my blog: http://albalaha.lefora.com
Can mentor a real, regular and serious player

KungFuBac

Thanks Albalaha for your thoughts/opinions. Always appreciated..


Continued Success,
"There are many large numbers smaller than one."

shawresse

Post removed because it contained advertising and unsponsored links, Alrelax/Administrator and Board Owner

CameronGraham

Post removed due to unauthorized links and non-sponsorship advertising. 

Alrelax, Admin and Board Owner

KungFuBac

Hi CameronGraham

I like the way you think.

"... Few people understand that it is better to try different slots where you will have bonuses than to use one bonus at your favorite casino and no longer have this advantage in the future. In such a big competition, there are enough good alternatives.   ..."


Continued Success,
"There are many large numbers smaller than one."

GordonReid

Post removed due to unauthorized links and non-sponsorship advertising. 

Alrelax, Admin and Board Owner