Texas,thanks for your explanation,if you lost your first bet and won on the increased bet would you increase your bet on the next sequence? Are you using this on a daily basis if so how successful have you been? Wishing you good returns.

Texas 117,I generally  bet similar in these situations.I also do the same for streaks of 5(pppppb bet p to return),but if it doesn't go p I bet B next bet(pppppbb bet B next). Can you give an example as to when your increasing your bet? Is it ppppppbp you win,increase here or wait for the next sequence of 6?

 Caddy and  Alrelax,the important thing is giving members a free line to post any methods they have.I am personally not expecting to find a "Holy Grail".It would be great wouldn't it.Still I respect the posters effort.In Atlantis defence he did say it was a " fun" method.On any given day it may work,just like other methods.

  The funny part is its two more than you tested!

Atlantis,tested it out on 2 shoes baccarat , random generator.Plus 7 both times. Biggest drawdown was 11 units.

Hi Jarabo,I can't follow your example,can you try again.It looks interesting.When are you increasing,etc.Thanks!

 Tomla,if you read reply 20 and 25 by Beat The Wheel you will get a feel for the march.

 Beat The Wheel,thank you, that is much better. Your examples are very clear.

 Hey Atlantis,enjoy a lot of your expertise over the years. How about your take on  this one,maybe a illustration would be great.

 Hi gr8,thanks for the response,I respect your views.A few things I,'d like to clarify. One I do not continuously bet maybe15-20 bets per shoe. I increase like this 1-1-2-2-3-3-4-4 etc so basically a half unit increase until i am  ahead,then I go back to 1 unit. Half unit is not overloading. I don't know when I will win just like you. I have a stop loss.God  Bless the Gr8.











bets per shoe.I increase like this 1-1-2-2-3-3 etc so its basically a half unit progression until I am ahead

 For me ,money management is more important. it's a 50-50 game and the difference between a good bet and bad bet is very small. I like Stetson Baileys ideas betting more on a winner than a loser because generally more losers. 

 Roversi13, l checked out the marigny selection and arc sine.I could not find any practical examples on the  arc sine   that could be used on the even chances.The Marigny looked possible in extreme cases involving a strong bias.Sputnik shows a case involving 14 singles and 2 series,std of 3,my question, how often would you see that?
So  unless you can quantify the usage of each in concrete examples, I will take a pass.On the positive side your betting B after a B I can buy into that not because I have the stats on it,I don't,it just seems possible.Thanks for your input.

You could try the penthouse progression .up one on a loss,down one on a win,reset at plus one.1-1-2-2-3-3,etc.you need to lose twice consecutively at each unit before you increase
To the next level.example two losses and a win,1-1-2,you are even,go back to 1and you get a win you are up one unit. You are probably right about your method being as good as any other. I think it comes down to good mm.
         If you win your p-p  bet p,you start over with a single b or p? Thanks for posting.

GR8,
      Best of luck to you and I know how passionate you are about the game.I was on  the old Baccarat Forum under the user name "tripper"and followed many of your posts.May the "Baccarat Gods" be on your side.Keep us posted.[smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]

  Horus,
           Thanks very much for info on the "Holloway Betting Methods".He certainly had a plan didn't he.You can pretty well use it, as you see fit.Hope I can use it to improve the bottom line.[smiley]aes/money.png[/smiley]