I wounder if there is an option on Betclic to check the progress of this. In sports betting is quite easy, but in casino and games can´t seem to find it....


Checkpoint at spin 61
Initial Bank = 100 units
Actual Bank = 195 units.

Ok, so now at spin 44.
Last Checkpoint was at spin 30 where the Bank was at 151 units.


Initial Bank = 100 units
Actual Bank at spin 44 = 164 units.
Using real money at Betclic.


Will post excel sheet actualization every 50 spins.
Objective 500 spins.


Unfortunatly wount have much time so this may take a while.
Promisse wount run away when things get bad for me.


Cheers!

My thought was:


1) Apply simple double street system (hope I'm doing it the right way) and at the same time cover the other two 12´s, oposite to the one with the choosen double street, with the same amount of bet (1 unit per bet at the beggining = 3 units on the first betting spin).


At this 1st betting spin you can have:
a) Result = 0 if you hit the 12´s (60% odds +-)
b) Result = 3 if you hit the double street (+-15% odds - not counting zero)
c) Result = -3 if you hit the double street no choosen (+-15% odds - not counting zero)


This seems wierd right?




No carry on following as a normal double street system adding one unit to the double street choosen before, plus another unit to the double street hit on the last spin. Also make the bet of 1 unit per 12´s that haven´t been hit in the last spin.
Total bet = 5


The main thing here is that now you have two 12´s covering +- 60% of the table and 2 double streets covering +- 15% x 2, being one of these double streets also covered by the refered 12´s, wich make a hit on a double street now a possibility with higher profit.


If you carry on making the progessions of the double street system (and add one unit per bet at the 12´s at every spin until get full profit of the double system - am only raising the 12´s after 2nd non hit double street) you´ll get to a point here you might have a lot of double streets covered also by 12´s bets and also we can make the losses in non double streets lower as you´ll have hits on the 12´s...


hum?
 

Thanks!

So I thought about this last night and posted on the general but haven't got much feedback so decided to test it.
My time is not much, so the beggining was only with 30 spins.
Going to keep on testing continuing the 30 spins to check what's happening because probably am just in a good luck mood.

The good luck strike may be a reality, the truth is that it would be applied also to a simple double street system, but with this procedure I'm testing the results with this good luck strike are way better (318% more profit) than they would be with simple double street system.

In 30 spins with double street system would have 16 units of profit, and with this "pete system" it got me 51 units.

Please don't get me wrong. Not saying i found something, so please correct me if my analysis and data is wrong at some point.


Take a look at the excel sheet here:

https://skydrive.live.com/redir?resid=B7AD9196CD4F9837!234&authkey=!AHKPbhDyXNliYwk


Where am i wrong?

Will i have the same percentage of loss on a losing strike?

Cheers from Portugal, the land of the sun!



ps: Pardon if my english is not cristal clear!

 


So I tested 30 Spins (i know its very few but my time lacks) going to post the results now in the Streets system.


318% more profit with mt method rather than just simple double street.


51% increase in Bank with 30 spins...

Sorry. I was actually talking about double streets. Ill try to make an excel out of my ideia and post it in the right sectoon...

I´ll try later to explain what i mean with capitalize, but i was thinking in something like this:


Imagine your playing double street system and at the 2nd or 3rd spin you get a profit of 4 units (you are on a good moment).
Why not start the next round of spins from zero but using those 4 units to cover the eventual loss?


Lets say spin one (no units) gives you the nº1.
I´ll bet 1 unit at 1st street right?
I´d say bet that 1 unit at street one, plus 2 units at 2nd 12´s and 3rd 12´s?
With this you may have 3 situations:


1) 2nd spin hits 1st street and your profit is 2 (6 - 4), but added to the initial 4, you get 6.
2) 2nd spin hits 2nd or 3rd 12´s and your profit is 1 (2X3 = 4 - 2 - 1 = 1) and still you continue to 2n spin at this round but without losing the 1st unit betted.
3) 2nd spin hits 1st 12´s but not 1st street....bad luck, you loss the initial profit of 4 and continue the spins of the system


You cover nearly 90% of the chances....or am i wrong?


3rd spin and you got chance situation 2...you will have it even more capitalized as you have streets on two differente 12´s, and one of them is also covered by those 2 (from the capitalized 4), so if it hits the street....you win the street profit and the 12´s profit.

Something is missing me there....not quite understanding.

I got that point Sam. As I said my suggestion was to try and capitalize those positive moments, and the respective profit, so that in the long term they can be higher than the the negative moments.


I´m a math person. I belive in math....so for me even knowing when to take the profit out and when to stop losing, in the long run there is life you´ll end up with a negative account there.


I found my self using the double street system and winning, losing, winning, losing.....now my ideia is to try and capitalize the winning periods in order to cover the losing ones.

What´s this?

Ok, so with no long answers or studies the truth is that no method can beat the roulette, but capitalizing the profits may change this situation?


How to capitalize?

Well, first of all since is one of my first posts let me introduce.


Peter, from Portugal 35 years old.


Been watching various roulette betting "methods" and they all end up at the same result.
In the long run, the is no profit.


Over and over we see more and more methods and "studies" or alternatives, but all of them (mostly discussed in this forum), give us nothing but losses in the long run.


So, my question is, what's the point?


The point might be....


1) Addictive mind trap
2) Stupidity
3) When winning (altough the long run gives us losses, there are methods where we have periods os profit) try to capitalize them in order to cover the long term losses


Is anyone with me?


1) is it truth that no method can beat the roulette?
2) is it truth that we can capitalize the "temporary profits"? - how?


Cheers.

Can anyone explain me why is it that no one answered this post?


what's the foop?


This actually seems to work...