+ Register

[Carlitos]

..... so Drazen, what kind of approach would you recommend to play roulette in such way that some bucks can be made, sort or long-term?






Carlitos 

[Drazen]

The best ones would be with edge like advantage play or any with significantly reduced variance.

Cheers

Drazen

[JohnLegend]

I can tell what I told to Ignatus in some other forum

Well the thing is no matter what you do, no matter what pattern you create, no matter with which odds, no matter wheel or carpet based one thing will be for sure.

They will all be "exposed" to perfectly same possible deviations in random (for deviations in spheres of roulette of course), which is actualy biggest problem in roulette, not house edge as many think (you wouldn't give a thing for zeros striking if your max losing streak would be enough to overcome it with progression before touching table limits).

That is mathematical fact.

Problem with this approach as yours John is that thinking solving that variance is so simple and absurd.

Because that should be taken as biggest thing in your whole approach of hit and run, that way it works and you allegedly have such results as you claim, you are aware of that right?

So we can say that what you do is collide two randomness. Random in game and random in short entrance point of betting and you expect not to have results with all characteristics of randomness such as variance in this case. You think that way you have reduced it and avoided in quite wide arc. That is illogical and absurd, and most important it can be proven. All can be proved except your results you have.

The other problem with you and this approach is actualy in proving it (with right way as you say) it can't be proved in scientific simulations (as Bayes and few other did many times) although all conditions can be perfectly correct simulated and verified.
So your agenda here is funny. Especialy when consider so insanely steep MM you use 

Few days ago new member come here, and his first post was: "I played JL-s methods now I have to recover..."

You tried to prove your claims with Bayeses software and Superman-s account but you didn't proved anything, except many many incosistenties in your actualy play, opposite of that what you were saying you will do.

Please just don't tell me wait and you will see, all you do is buying your time here. How long through all your time on forums you are saying wait and I ll show you, you will sing another song then..  Nothing by now. You were saying about some conquering europe casinos last year, but you forgot about it.. It is more important to be here and persuading people that alchemy can be done.

Just don't tell me Chauncy or whoever plays like you is successful and understood "right way". AMK is nice and very honest guy to whom I spoke personaly few times, the one who created one method you are using, well he doesn't plays it nor having money out of roulette as you with this same genius approach. Guess why..

Cheers

Drazen

Drazen I can't speak for anyone else. I have set the date. There will be no more doubt after that. My original plan from last july was to go from 200 units to 5000 in a year. All the messing around with unsound software and rngs wasted alot of time. But I am still going to reach that target and go way beyond it.

You know the thing im always talking about PATIENCE. Well it comes out of people very quickly on these forums. You are telling me my approach can't work. Then Gizmotron is telling me the same. Then spike. Then that lovely fella who owns the other forum/s. Everyone and the kitchen sink.

All say JL is mad and telling the greatest lies of alltime. So get it all in now Drazen. When im there im there. Then the ball will be in yours and all the other detractors court. HOW WAS THIS POSSIBLE? These methods are guaranteed losers. They have no merit.

I've heard it ALL and then some Drazen. The explaining will all be on you and the rest from July. I won't say a thing. I won't gloat. I will just continue. And you will just scratch your head. And continue to say the same. Only the numbers will say something else. And that's all there will be to it.

[Trebor]

Hello again JL,


I've lost track with this.


Are your efforts still being independently verified by Superman. If not even if you realize your aims no one will believe you.


Trebor

[JohnLegend]

Hello again JL,


I've lost track with this.


Are your efforts still being independently verified by Superman. If not even if you realize your aims no one will believe you.


Trebor

Yes they are. And for his interest, patience in this. He receives 50% of the total pot.

[Ralph]

Yes they are. And for his interest, patience in this. He receives 50% of the total pot.

Are you bribeing an independent supevisor?

[Drazen]

Philosophy again, no references to fact evident things...

I am sorry I missed to understand how do you mean to prove that? And that your proof will be possible to test I suppose? Not some picture or video or someone else speaking for you?

It is interesting how in your posts you say you show respect, patience, understanding (even love to say so) to random and next second you smash it hardly in the face saying: You are not random anymore, when I did this to you, won't have the variance as you naturaly must have!

It is all about that John. You allegedly manage to avoid that variance in so great, simple and "cheeky" manner which defies all basic laws of this game. Incredible! 

And be sure that when you prove this is possible like you are saying,with the way you are saying I ll make you a statue in the center of my house. And then be sure you will get Nobel prize in mathematics for significant reducing variance in random process.

Great part of your whole philosophy is in some kind od waiting, expecting, bowing heads and breaking egos when you prove your stuff to your "opponents", but almost nothing on obeying real laws in nature that can't be avoided, with the way you are saying.

Cheers

Drazen

[Superman]

Are your efforts still being independently verified by Superman

Yes they are trebor

Are you bribeing an independent supevisor?

I can't be bought Ralph, I'll say it how it is.

JL works for me now lol

[Ralph]

 
I can't be bought Ralph, I'll say it how it is.

JL works for me now lol

If he not have success, you got nothing. You may act as a venture capitalist.

[JohnLegend]

Philosophy again, no references to fact evident things...

I am sorry I missed to understand how do you mean to prove that? And that your proof will be possible to test I suppose? Not some picture or video or someone else speaking for you?

It is interesting how in your posts you say you show respect, patience, understanding (even love to say so) to random and next second you smash it hardly in the face saying: You are not random anymore, when I did this to you, won't have the variance as you naturaly must have!

It is all about that John. You allegedly manage to avoid that variance in so great, simple and "cheeky" manner which defies all basic laws of this game. Incredible! 

And be sure that when you prove this is possible like you are saying,with the way you are saying I ll make you a statue in the center of my house. And then be sure you will get Nobel prize in mathematics for significant reducing variance in random process.

Great part of your whole philosophy is in some kind od waiting, expecting, bowing heads and breaking egos when you prove your stuff to your "opponents", but almost nothing on obeying real laws in nature that can't be avoided, with the way you are saying.

Cheers

Drazen

You know Drazen you can try TOO HARD. And that's what alot of people trying to break this game are guilty of. They figure if this game is hundreds of years old. How can it be possible for a simple method to beat it longterm.
Surely it requires some equation that looks like something Einstein scribbled on a blackboard. WELL IT doesn't.

But it requires qualities that very few human beings possess. Money management can beat this game, even if the method is average. You are betting money to win money. How you take it up and down makes the world of difference. The problem with most people involved in this game is they can't break away from all that's gone before.

Their thought process is stuck in the past. So how do we bring them to the matrix? Maybe some serious success will be the jolt necessary. We will see.

[Superman]

If he not have success, you got nothing.

Yes that true, but I won't have lost anything either.

[JohnLegend]

Yes that true, but I won't have lost anything either.

Superman can't lose. I've promised him a minumum of 2K by July. Even if I lost everything by then which I won't.

He gets 2K.

[MarignyGrilleau]

I would love 2k too. Even 1k. I can wait until December, as by then it will be such a tiny fraction.

[JohnLegend]

I would love 2k too. Even 1k. I can wait until December, as by then it will be such a tiny fraction.

I thought you were already winning truckloads Marigny. You and ralph have it wrapped up. Or that was my understanding. Ralph has botterized the RNG world. Tiny fraction for who?. Superman gets 50% all the way. 2K is the minumum. If all goes to plan.

By December ill be on his Xmas card list.

[TwoCatSam]

Not raggin' in John, but the question still nags me.  Why does a man living in the UK need Superman to loan him a BV account?

Free people in the UK can open accounts anywhere, can't they?

Sam