I don't know what the law says but there's a lot of "the last person to touch it is completely to blame" attitude about   

Rob

@ Superman,

You say,

"I would guestimate I only win around 40% of the bets I place,"

This is odd. Surely just blind guessing should give you better results.

Fair enough if you're talking about one session as some would give a higher than 50% win rate.

I'm sure there is a logical explanation but I can't see it and it's troubling me.

Trebor

For all it's idiosyncrasies, (had to use the dictionary for that, how do I make spellcheck work?), English has become a world language. As such it must be an evolving language with inputs from everywhere so keep going Biagle.
OT I know but it's a hobby horse of mine.

Trebor

I agree Turner.


TV science will always be just "entertainment science" but I'm a sucker for all that type of thing.


Who would watch a 3 minute programme?  On second thoughts isn't that about the modern attention span?


Trebor

Quote from: Marshall Bing Bell on July 11, 2013, 11:34:47 PM
John won't be back, not for this anyway.

Superman put all this to rest some time ago and closed access to the test account for JL, but only after JL lost almost everything then when MIA for weeks.

Let's move on, we all new he wouldn't be successful, anyway.

It was a cruddy system with an even cruddier money management... never stood a chance.

That will be his get out clause. "I wasn't given the chance to pull it all back and then go on to make millions".


Trebor

One question if I may Sputnik.


Does recovery mode apply continually once beyond the first progression level?
i.e. you're betting for a chop until a full recovery is achieved.


Trebor

Hello Sam,


Glad to see you're doing OK.


Would you say that you have arrived at a workable way to profits. One observation I'll make is that without BV some sessions would be seriously long even with a bot.


Or am I being guilty of the topic heading?


Trebor

monaco,


I'm not keeping records (maybe should) but I think about 30 sessions or so.


It should be more with the bot but I can't leave it to run multiple sessions on Dublinbet until Stef sorts out the popup. I'm hoping he will soon.


It's a bit frustrating as I thought with the bot 'd be knocking out 10 or more sessions a day, then it would have 300 sessions or so.


Trebor

I'm still playing this monaco, but not as much as I was.


In testing I reached 915 points in 265 sessions which is 3.52 per session, all flat betting. This was on mostly Dublinbet actuals.


The last few weeks I've been playing for real on Dublinbet but getting nowhere fast.  I'm still hovering around break even so I'll carry on and hope it's just a bad spell.


Thinking I need to apply a lower stop loss, maybe even the -35 you suggested in an earlier post.


Trebor

After good initial gains I've been standing still for what seems ages. Gaining some, losing some. All flat betting.


From my results and those of Dane and monaco I saw it as very long term so I got it botted.  I have found out that even with a bot doing the work it gets very boring (also my Dublinbet bot can't be left for more than one hour on it's own).


I need my computer for other things as well.


@Sam. Are your results with progression? Every attempt I made at some sort of progression in testing was a disaster.


Trebor

Quote from: Superman on March 06, 2013, 08:33:22 AM
EDIT: forgot to say, JL sent me a PM asking to continue the challenge with a fresh £300 I have agreed again, but this will be the last time as far as I am concerned, I have also told him to report to the forum frequently as he hasn't in the past, my arguement being the fact that he kept the loss quiet and only responded when I posted the bad news.

It's been more than two weeks. How's it going JL?


Trebor

I shred everything.


Probably a bit paranoid 


Trebor

You've been on a sustained downward trend for a while now Dane, I think your high point was at about session 350 or so.


On the up side it's still in profit. I'm hoping you will start an upward trend soom. These things always go in cycles.


Trebor

I've modified my post #111


Trebor

Quote from: Stepkevh on April 12, 2013, 09:21:04 PM
Trebor,

didn't you say me that the repeater bets must be different ?
4 repeater numbers and the fifth that completes it must be a one hitter ?

Stef

I think I'm just not very good at explaining it.


If you have four repeater numbers and a fifth number that has appeared once, all in a row, then that number is bet hoping it will form a row of five repeaters.


Trebor