Number Prediction

A fanciful dream?  Or a reality waiting for the right set of levers to release it?

Plug this into google:  formulas to predict numbers   

You'll get over 60k hits!

Off the first page we have:

Maths to predict lottery numbers:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2585157/You-CAN-predict-lottery-numbers-Brazilian-mathematician-claims.html

and

http://lifetickler.com/lottery-can-be-predicted-according-to-math/  [interesting formulas are included here]

How to find a formula for a set of numbers:
http://www.johansens.us/sane/education/formula.htm

Here's a formula for a sequence of numbers:
http://math.cmu.edu/~bkell/21110-2010s/formula.html

Remember this: lottery numbers and roulette numbers are both in a closed system.  The mathematically literate might like to tinker and experiment with the formulas.

And whilst on that thought I've tinkered and experimented to convert the attached PDF from occasionally useful to regularly useful. The author's claim of 93% was -- putting it kindly -- fanciful ! 

You might come up with a tweak that unlocks a door...

Energy, Vibration and Resonance

Everything is energy vibrating at different frequencies.

Quantum entanglement and number flows is a rich seam for exploration.

Number vibrations is a field already successfully exploited after years of hard work by a forum member and his team of testers.

Consider this chart    [attachimg=1]    as a catalyst for your own research.

To set the ball rolling consider:


1 The Golden Ratio.

It occurs in the natural world, and has been used in architecture, music, art and design, just for starters.

So of you might like to see if the ratio has any application to roulette, or to the ratio of wins:losses, or....



2  The Golden String...Phi and the Rabbit Sequence in binary format...the Golden Sequence...

Google will reveal plenty of links.

This resource could be a useful starting point:
http://www.maths.surrey.ac.uk/hosted-sites/R.Knott/Fibonacci/fibrab.html

[As an aside, I have found the Golden Sequence often occurs in roulette and can be exploited. ]



So do your own research if the ideas appeal to you.

DEFINITION OF BRAINSTORMING:

"Brainstorming is a group creativity technique by which efforts are made to find a conclusion for a specific problem by gathering a list of ideas spontaneously contributed by its members." [ Wikipedia]

In this thread there is NO BAD IDEA.

There will be no "right" or "wrong" ideas.

ALL judgements and disbelief are to be suspended.

Members are free to put forward whatever BET SELECTION IDEAS AND APPROACHES they wish without fear of ridicule, personal attacks or criticism.

I will simply delete any critical threads so don't waste your time writing one!


This thread is intended to list ideas only. It's not for general discussion of an idea.  Start your own thread if you want to discuss an idea.

Regard this thread's contents as catalysts for your own research and development, if a particular idea appeals to you.


"Everything you can imagine is real." [Pablo Picasso]

That Picasso quote is so true. Thoughts can create reality.

Just one tiny example:  when driving I imagine a spare parking slot near to where I want to go.

Invariably, there is one...just as I imagined. Even on a busy day.


I'll close with two other relevant quotes.

"Those who stop dreaming ... are lost" [An Australian Aboriginal proverb]

and

"Logic will get you from A to B. Imagination will take you everywhere." [Albert Einstein]

It is using such inflammatory phrases as "idiotic topics" that deters people from bothering to post their ideas and methods.

I know of five very successful [they have an edge] yet quite radical approaches that have been quietly developed by individuals or  small, collaborative groups working well away from forums.

They shun publicity.

Why?

Because they have learned either through personal experience, or by observing the fate of others who have posted to forums, that it's often the poster who is unpleasantly attacked and criticised, rather than the idea they are proposing.

No wonder few people are game to use forums such as this to discuss their ideas.

All credit to the brave ones that do.

For those struggling with Standard Deviation here is an excellent, step-by-step explanation:

http://www.mathsisfun.com/data/standard-deviation-formulas.html

I have found it most useful in coding SD calculations in several of my programs.

Good grief!  You are the wars.

I recall some saying about bad luck coming in threes -- not without foundation in your case.

I was wondering why I'd not heard back from you after emailing you. Now I know why!

Good to see your morale -- if not your pecker -- is up. [In case our American friends are grinning they need to see this:  http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/217400.html ]

We look forward to your full recovery.

Thanks, Mike. The commission is attractive!

Very impressive results!

The name of the forum is "betselection".

We look forward to you telling us all how your bets are selected. 

Victor is in extremis with all his coding projects and asked me to step back in.

I don't mind, as long as folk realize:

•     It's just me (at the moment)
  
  
•     I have commitments off the forum (yes, I have a life elsewhere, as shocking as it might seem)
  
  
•     I'm not necessarily in your time zone!
  
  

So for those 3 reasons you'll need to be patient with any delays in response.

Finally, as established members know, I do consider the Rules to be more than just cake decorations...

Unless Rules are observed -- and enforced -- chaos and anarchy ensue!  Sad but true   


I draw your attention to the following rule in particular which has recently been totally ignored in several threads:

#4 It goes without saying: No trolling. No name calling. And no personal attacks on individual members because you dislike, or disagree with, what they wrote.


PLEASE NOTE WELL:  If breaches continue, the guilty parties will be put on pre-post moderation. In other words, it's not published until approved -- when I get around to it.

And persistent offenders will be muted. Unhesitatingly. Why not?  It's an inevitable consequence of their actions and poor choices to persistently ignore the rule. 

Thank you very much to the above posters.

I really appreciate your welcomes and comments.

Victor is in extremis with all his coding projects and asked me to step back in.

I don't mind, as long as folk realize:

• It's just me (at the moment)
  
  
• I have commitments off the forum (yes, I have a life elsewhere, as shocking as it might seem)
  
  
• I'm not necessarily in your time zone!
  
  

So for those 3 reasons you'll need to be patient with any delays in response.

Finally, as established members know, I do consider the Rules to be more than just cake decorations...

Unless Rules are observed -- and enforced -- chaos and anarchy ensue!  Sad but true   

The software is complex.

Therefore, testers need a very high standard of English

* to read and fully understand the documentation

* to watch, listen to and understand the instruction videos on Udemy

Anyone who tries to run the software without fully understanding it is unlikely to be using it as Petr intends it to be used.

Putting it kindly, their results could be suspect.

Take a look at the posts and then ask yourself if the recent tester fits the standard of English needed. Perhaps his/her conclusion is valid; perhaps not. [Yes, at least he/she had a try.]

If we're going to have it tested properly let others step forward who fit the language criteria. [And before you suggest it : I have neither the time nor the money to do it myself.]

Ignore him, Petr.

I've looked at several of your videos, read your site's content and can see NO EVIDENCE of a scam.

@Kav and others scratching their head

Here's the link to provide enlightenment:

http://betselection.cc/straight-up-2/winkel's-gut-some-resources-listed/



Moving on...

@ system Gambler

I think your videos are very well done.

I particularly enjoyed the last one. 

Your intelligent and thoughtful commentary offers very useful insights into the thinking behind your decisions.

The tracker is impressive in its details.  (The coding and debuging must have been a nightmare!)

I look forward to your future videos.

Sehr gut!

Peter, I've read your explanations several times and thought about what you've written.

For me, maths was never a strength but I can't see anything wrong with your basic premise.

I do know that particular bet works well in your excellent program.